Literature DB >> 21565335

Placing symptoms in context: the role of contextual criteria in reducing false positives in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnoses.

Jerome C Wakefield1, Michael B First.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) definition of mental disorder requires that symptoms be caused by a dysfunction in the individual; when dysfunction is absent, symptoms represent normal-range distress or eccentricity and, if diagnosed as a mental disorder, are false positives. We hypothesized that because of psychiatry's lack of direct laboratory tests to distinguish dysfunction from normal-range distress, the context in which symptoms occur (eg, lack of imminent danger in a panic attack) is often essential to determining whether symptoms are caused by a dysfunction. If this is right, then the DSM diagnostic criteria should include many contextual criteria added to symptom syndromes to prevent dysfunction false positives. Despite their potential importance, such contextual criteria have not been previously reviewed. We, thus, systematically reviewed DSM categories to establish the extent of such uses of contextual criteria and created a typology of such uses.
RESULTS: Of 111 sampled categories, 68 (61%) used context to prevent dysfunction false positives. Contextual criteria fell into 7 types: (1) exclusion of specific false-positive scenarios; (2) requiring that patients experience preconditions for normal responses (eg, requiring that individuals experience adequate sexual stimulation before being diagnosed with sexual dysfunctions); (3) requiring that symptoms be disproportionate relative to circumstances; (4) for childhood disorders, requiring that symptoms be developmentally inappropriate; (5) requiring that symptoms occur in multiple contexts; (6) requiring a substantial discrepancy between beliefs and reality; and (7) a residual category.
CONCLUSIONS: Most DSM categories include contextual criteria to eliminate false-positive diagnoses and increase validity of descriptive criteria. Future revisions should systematically evaluate each category's need for contextual criteria.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565335     DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  6 in total

1.  Wittgenstein's nightmare: why the RDoC grid needs a conceptual dimension.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: a call for greater clarity and precision.

Authors:  L Fisher; J S Gonzalez; W H Polonsky
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Klerman's "credo" reconsidered: neo-Kraepelinianism, Spitzer's views, and what we can learn from the past.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Towards a genuinely medical model for psychiatric nosology.

Authors:  Randolph M Nesse; Dan J Stein
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Culture and Context in Mental Health Diagnosing: Scrutinizing the DSM-5 Revision.

Authors:  Anna Bredström
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2019-09

6.  How Many People have Alcohol Use Disorders? Using the Harmful Dysfunction Analysis to Reconcile Prevalence Estimates in Two Community Surveys.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield; Mark F Schmitz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.