Literature DB >> 21565322

Comparisons of apolipoprotein B levels estimated by immunoassay, nuclear magnetic resonance, vertical auto profile, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia (SAFARI Trial).

Scott M Grundy1, Gloria Lena Vega, Joanne E Tomassini, Andrew M Tershakovec.   

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins constitute non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol. These are atherogenic lipoproteins and non-HDL cholesterol is a secondary target of treatment beyond LDL cholesterol in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Some investigators favor total apolipoprotein B over non-HDL cholesterol as the secondary target of treatment. This is based on publications suggesting that total apolipoprotein B is more predictive of cardiovascular events than non-HDL cholesterol. Several methods are available for estimating total apolipoprotein B. This study compared total apolipoprotein estimated by immunonephelometric assay (INA), vertical auto profile (VAP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and non-HDL cholesterol levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia from the previously reported Simvastatin plus Fenofibrate for Combined Hyperlipidemia (SAFARI) trial. Total apolipoprotein B levels were found to be highest by INA, intermediate by NMR and non-HDL cholesterol, and lowest by VAP. Concordance for non-HDL cholesterol levels among the INA, VAP, and NMR methods was better than that for total apolipoprotein B levels; the correlation between non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B by INA was strongest (0.929). In patients with a low triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio (<3.5), total apolipoprotein B determined by INA was higher than that estimated from non-HDL cholesterol levels, whereas in patients with a high triglyceride/HDL C ratio (≥3.5), apolipoprotein B predicted using non-HDL cholesterol was in better agreement with INA-determined apolipoprotein B levels. Similar trends were observed with VAP using equations specific for LDL particle size. In conclusion, more work is needed to improve agreement of apolipoprotein B measurements among methods employed clinically. Non-HDL cholesterol is also useful to predict total apolipoprotein B and some improvement may be attained by taking into account the ratio of triglyceride/HDL cholesterol as a measurement of LDL particle size. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565322     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of advanced lipid testing in the prediction of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Alvin Chandra; Anand Rohatgi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Update on the NCEP ATP-III emerging cardiometabolic risk factors.

Authors:  Robert H Eckel; Marc-Andre Cornier
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Comparison of calculated remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels with levels directly measured by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Jie Kuang; Xiaoyu Tang; Ling Mao; Xin Guo; Qin Luo; Daoquan Peng; Bilian Yu
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Triglyceride/HDL ratio as a screening tool for predicting success at reducing anti-diabetic medications following weight loss.

Authors:  Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha; Anita Ashok Kumar; Scott Kahan; Pavan Kumar Irukulla; Lawrence Jay Cheskin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of PCSK9 Inhibition by Alirocumab on Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Koren; Dean Kereiakes; Ray Pourfarzib; Deborah Winegar; Poulabi Banerjee; Sara Hamon; Corinne Hanotin; James M McKenney
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.