Literature DB >> 21565277

Factors influencing the outcome of a second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in relapsed multiple myeloma: a study from the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry.

Gordon Cook1, Effie Liakopoulou, Rachel Pearce, Jim Cavet, Gareth J Morgan, Keiren Kirkland, Julia Lee, Faith E Davies, Rachel Hall, Amin Rahemtulla, Nigel Russell, David I Marks.   

Abstract

Autologous stem cell transplant as primary (first ASCT) therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is standard practice. The role of a second ASCT as management of relapsed disease remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective case-matched control analysis on patients (n = 106) who underwent a second ASCT compared with conventional chemotherapy (CCT) as for relapsed MM. The median age was 53 years (range: 26-75) and median follow-up 48 months (range: 8, 136). The cumulative incidence of 1 and 5 years nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3%-13%) and 12% (95% CI 7%-19%), with a second ASCT inducing a greater partial remission (PR) rate of 63%. The 4-year overall survival (OS) rate was 33% (95% CI 24%-45%). Factors associated with improved OS and progression-free survival (PFS) included younger age (<55 years), β(2)MG <2.5 mg/L at diagnosis, a remission duration of >9 months from first ASCT, and a greater PR in response to their first ASCT. In a matched-cohort analysis with patients receiving conventional chemotherapy (CCT), the same factors were associated with improved OS, with the exception of a longer remission duration (>18 months) from first ASCT. Second ASCT in relapsed MM is associated with superior OS and PFS compared with CCT, offering a potential consolidative option for selected patients.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565277     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  15 in total

Review 1.  First line vs delayed transplantation in myeloma: Certainties and controversies.

Authors:  Annamaria Brioli
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 2.  European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies in 2014.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Pieter Sonneveld; Faith Davies; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Michele Cavo; Gareth Morgan; Javier de la Rubia; Michel Delforge; Meletios Dimopoulos; Hermann Einsele; Thierry Facon; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Hareth Nahi; Torben Plesner; Jesús San-Miguel; Roman Hajek; Pia Sondergeld; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-07-25

3.  Outcomes of salvage autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma with cytopenias and exposure to novel agents.

Authors:  D Tremblay; G Lancman; E Moshier; N Bar; S Jagannath; A Chari
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Current therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Torimoto; Motohiro Shindo; Katsuya Ikuta; Yutaka Kohgo
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Guidelines From the Mayo Stratification for Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy.

Authors:  David Dingli; Sikander Ailawadhi; P Leif Bergsagel; Francis K Buadi; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Wilson I Gonsalves; Susan R Hayman; Prashant Kapoor; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Shaji K Kumar; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; Nelson Leung; Yi Lin; John A Lust; Joseph R Mikhael; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Taimur Sher; A Keith Stewart; Rahma Warsame; Stephen R Zeldenrust; S Vincent Rajkumar; Asher A Chanan Khan
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection after autologous transplant for multiple myeloma: low platelet count predicts for poor collection and sole use of resulting graft enhances risk of myelodysplasia.

Authors:  X Papanikolaou; E R Rosenbaum; L N Tyler; J Sawyer; C J Heuck; B Barlogie; M Cottler-Fox
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  How we manage autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Morie A Gertz; David Dingli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Salvage bortezomib-dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell support (ASCT) in myeloma patients at first relapse after HDM with ASCT. A phase-2 trial.

Authors:  P Gimsing; Ø Hjertner; N Abildgaard; N F Andersen; T G Dahl; H Gregersen; T W Klausen; U-H Mellqvist; O Linder; R Lindås; N Tøffner Clausen; S Lenhoff
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Outcomes of salvage autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma after initial autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Baldeep Wirk; Michael Byrne; Yunfeng Dai; Jan S Moreb
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-04-23

10.  Rationale and design of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) trial ReLApsE: a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone plus subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marc-Andrea Baertsch; Jana Schlenzka; Elias K Mai; Maximilian Merz; Jens Hillengaß; Marc S Raab; Dirk Hose; Patrick Wuchter; Anthony D Ho; Anna Jauch; Thomas Hielscher; Christina Kunz; Steffen Luntz; Stefan Klein; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Martin Goerner; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Peter Reimer; Ullrich Graeven; Roland Fenk; Hans Salwender; Christof Scheid; Axel Nogai; Mathias Haenel; Hans W Lindemann; Hans Martin; Richard Noppeney; Katja Weisel; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.