Literature DB >> 21565091

Detecting populations in the 'ambiguous' zone: kinship-based estimation of population structure at low genetic divergence.

Per J Palsbøll1, M Zachariah Peery, Martine Bérubé.   

Abstract

Identifying population structure is one of the most common and important objectives of spatial analyses using population genetic data. Population structure is detected either by rejecting the null hypothesis of a homogenous distribution of genetic variation, or by estimating low migration rates. Issues arise with most current population genetic inference methods when the genetic divergence is low among putative populations. Low levels of genetic divergence may be as a result of either high ongoing migration or historic high migration but no current, ongoing migration. We direct attention to recent developments in the use of the tempo-spatial distribution of closely related individuals to detect population structure or estimate current migration rates. These 'kinship-based' approaches complement more traditional population-based genetic inference methods by providing a means to detect population structure and estimate current migration rates when genetic divergence is low. However, for kinship-based methods to become widely adopted, formal estimation procedures applicable to a range of species life histories are needed.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Year:  2010        PMID: 21565091     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02887.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  12 in total

1.  Genetic inferences about the population dynamics of codling moth females at a local scale.

Authors:  P Franck; B Ricci; E K Klein; J Olivares; S Simon; J-M Cornuet; C Lavigne
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Incorporating non-equilibrium dynamics into demographic history inferences of a migratory marine species.

Authors:  E L Carroll; R Alderman; J L Bannister; M Bérubé; P B Best; L Boren; C S Baker; R Constantine; K Findlay; R Harcourt; L Lemaire; P J Palsbøll; N J Patenaude; V J Rowntree; J Seger; D Steel; L O Valenzuela; M Watson; O E Gaggiotti
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Combined analyses of kinship and FST suggest potential drivers of chaotic genetic patchiness in high gene-flow populations.

Authors:  Matthew Iacchei; Tal Ben-Horin; Kimberly A Selkoe; Christopher E Bird; Francisco J García-Rodríguez; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?

Authors:  Anna M Kopps; Jungkoo Kang; William B Sherwin; Per J Palsbøll
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 5.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Absolute abundance of southern bluefin tuna estimated by close-kin mark-recapture.

Authors:  Mark V Bravington; Peter M Grewe; Campbell R Davies
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Sea surface currents and geographic isolation shape the genetic population structure of a coral reef fish in the Indian Ocean.

Authors:  Filip Huyghe; Marc Kochzius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Next-generation metrics for monitoring genetic erosion within populations of conservation concern.

Authors:  Gregoire Leroy; Emma L Carroll; Mike W Bruford; J Andrew DeWoody; Allan Strand; Lisette Waits; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Spatial genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and migration patterns in a continuously harvested grey wolf (Canis lupus) population in north-eastern Europe.

Authors:  Maris Hindrikson; Jaanus Remm; Peep Männil; Janis Ozolins; Egle Tammeleht; Urmas Saarma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fin whale MDH-1 and MPI allozyme variation is not reflected in the corresponding DNA sequences.

Authors:  Morten Tange Olsen; Christophe Pampoulie; Anna K Daníelsdóttir; Emmelie Lidh; Martine Bérubé; Gísli A Víkingsson; Per J Palsbøll
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.