Literature DB >> 21565090

Spatial-temporal stratifications in natural populations and how they affect understanding and estimation of effective population size.

Robin S Waples1.   

Abstract

The concept of effective population size (N(e) ) is based on an elegantly simple idea which, however, rapidly becomes very complex when applied to most real-world situations. In natural populations, spatial and temporal stratifications create different classes of individuals with different vital rates, and this in turn affects (generally reduces) N(e) in complex ways. I consider how these natural stratifications influence our understanding of effective size and how to estimate it, and what the consequences are for conservation and management of natural populations. Important points that emerge include the following: 1  The relative influences of local vs metapopulation N(e) depend on a variety of factors, including the time frame of interest. 2  Levels of diversity in local populations are strongly influenced by even low levels of migration, so these measures are not reliable indicators of local N(e) . 3  For long-term effective size, obtaining a reliable estimate of mutation rate is the most important consideration; unless this is accomplished, estimates can be biased by orders of magnitude. 4  At least some estimators of contemporary N(e) appear to be robust to relatively high (approximately 10%) equilibrium levels of migration, so under many realistic scenarios they might yield reliable estimates of local N(e) . 5  Age structure probably has little effect on long-term estimators of N(e) but can strongly influence contemporary estimates. 6  More research is needed in several key areas: (i) to disentangle effects of selection and drift in metapopulations connected by intermediate levels of migration; (ii) to elucidate the relationship between N(b) (effective number of breeders per year) and N(e) per generation in age-structured populations; (iii) to perform rigorous sensitivity analyses of new likelihood and coalescent-based methods for estimating demographic and evolutionary histories. Published 2010. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Year:  2010        PMID: 21565090     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02876.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  30 in total

1.  The influence of persistent individual differences and age at maturity on effective population size.

Authors:  Aline Magdalena Lee; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Strong gene flow and lack of stable population structure in the face of rapid adaptation to local temperature in a spring-spawning salmonid, the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus).

Authors:  C Junge; L A Vøllestad; N J Barson; T O Haugen; J Otero; G-P Sætre; E H Leder; C R Primmer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Peak and persistent excess of genetic diversity following an abrupt migration increase.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Daniela Streit; Jérôme Goudet; Séverine Vuilleumier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic monitoring reveals temporal stability over 30 years in a small, lake-resident brown trout population.

Authors:  J Charlier; L Laikre; N Ryman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Demographic and genetic factors shaping contemporary metapopulation effective size and its empirical estimation in salmonid fish.

Authors:  F P Palstra; D E Ruzzante
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Adaptive divergence despite strong genetic drift: genomic analysis of the evolutionary mechanisms causing genetic differentiation in the island fox (Urocyon littoralis).

Authors:  W Chris Funk; Robert E Lovich; Paul A Hohenlohe; Courtney A Hofman; Scott A Morrison; T Scott Sillett; Cameron K Ghalambor; Jesus E Maldonado; Torben C Rick; Mitch D Day; Nicholas R Polato; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Timothy J Coonan; Kevin R Crooks; Adam Dillon; David K Garcelon; Julie L King; Christina L Boser; Nicholas Gould; William F Andelt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Mixing rates in weakly differentiated stocks of greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili) in the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  John S Hargrove; Debra J Murie; Daryl C Parkyn; Emily V Saarinen; James D Austin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Life history and demographic determinants of effective/census size ratios as exemplified by brown trout (Salmo trutta).

Authors:  Dimitar Serbezov; Per Erik Jorde; Louis Bernatchez; Esben Moland Olsen; Leif Asbjørn Vøllestad
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Linkage disequilibrium and effective population size when generations overlap.

Authors:  John D Robinson; Gregory R Moyer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Genetic differentiation and signatures of local adaptation revealed by RADseq for a highly dispersive mud crab Scylla olivacea (Herbst, 1796) in the Sulu Sea.

Authors:  Michael John R Mendiola; Rachel Ravago-Gotanco
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.