Literature DB >> 21565074

Detecting dyads of related individuals in large collections of DNA-profiles by controlling the false discovery rate.

H J Skaug1, M Bérubé, P J Palsbøll.   

Abstract

The search for pairs (dyads) of related individuals in large databases of DNA-profiles has become an increasingly important inference tool in ecology. However, the many, partly dependent, pairwise comparisons introduce statistical issues. We show that the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure is well suited to control for the proportion of false positives, i.e. dyads consisting of unrelated individuals, which under normal circumstances would have been labelled as related individuals. We verify the behaviour of the standard FDR procedure by simulation, demonstrating that the FDR procedure works satisfactory in spite of the many dependent pairwise comparisons involved in an exhaustive database screening. A computer program that implements this method is available online. In addition, we propose to implement a second stage in the procedure, in which additional independent genetic markers are used to identify the false positives. We demonstrate the application of the approach in an analysis of a DNA database consisting of 3300 individual minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) each typed at ten microsatellite loci. Applying the standard procedure with an FDR of 50% led to the identification of 74 putative dyads of 1st- or 2nd-order relatives. However, introducing the second step, which involved additional genotypes at 15 microsatellite loci, revealed that only 21 of the putative dyads can be claimed with high certainty to be true dyads.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21565074     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02833.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  6 in total

1.  Groups of related belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) travel together during their seasonal migrations in and around Hudson Bay.

Authors:  Gabriel J Colbeck; Pierre Duchesne; Lianne D Postma; Véronique Lesage; Mike O Hammill; Julie Turgeon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genotyping errors in a calibrated DNA register: implications for identification of individuals.

Authors:  Øystein A Haaland; Kevin A Glover; Bjørghild B Seliussen; Hans J Skaug
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Epigenetic estimation of age in humpback whales.

Authors:  Andrea M Polanowski; Jooke Robbins; David Chandler; Simon N Jarman
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?

Authors:  Anna M Kopps; Jungkoo Kang; William B Sherwin; Per J Palsbøll
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Investigating population genetic structure in a highly mobile marine organism: the minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata acutorostrata in the North East Atlantic.

Authors:  María Quintela; Hans J Skaug; Nils Øien; Tore Haug; Bjørghild B Seliussen; Hiroko K Solvang; Christophe Pampoulie; Naohisa Kanda; Luis A Pastene; Kevin A Glover
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data.

Authors:  Veronika Städele; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.