Literature DB >> 21564557

The value of non-echo planar HASTE diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection, localisation and prediction of extent of postoperative cholesteatoma.

S Khemani1, R K Lingam, A Kalan, A Singh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo-spin-echo (HASTE) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection, localisation and prediction of extent of cholesteatoma following canal wall up mastoid surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective blinded observational study.
SETTING: University affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients undergoing second-look surgery after previous canal wall up mastoid surgery for primary acquired cholesteatoma.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent non-echo planar HASTE diffusion-weighted imaging prior to being offered 'second-look' surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiological findings were correlated with second-look intra-operative findings in 38 cases with regard to presence, location and maximum dimensions of cholesteatoma.
RESULTS: Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo-spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging accurately predicted the presence of cholesteatoma in 23 of 28 cases, and it correctly excluded in nine of 10 cases. Five false negatives were caused by keratin pearls of <2 mm and in one case 5 mm. Overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of cholesteatoma were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62-94%) and 90% (CI 55-100%), respectively. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 96% (CI 79-100%) and 64% (CI 35-87%), respectively. Overall accuracy for detection of cholesteatoma was 84% (CI 69-94%). Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo-spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging has good performance in localising cholesteatoma to a number of anatomical sub-sites within the middle ear and mastoid (sensitivity ranging from 75% to 88% and specificity ranging from 94% to 100%). There was no statistically significant difference in the size of cholesteatoma detected radiologically and that found during surgery (paired t-test, P = 0.16). However, analysis of size agreement suggests possible radiological underestimation of size when using HASTE diffusion-weighted imaging (mean difference -0.6 mm, CI -5.3 to 4.6 mm).
CONCLUSION: Half-Fourier-acquisition single-shot turbo-spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging performs reasonably well in predicting the presence and location of postoperative cholesteatoma but may miss small foci of disease and may underestimate the true size of cholesteatoma.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564557     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02332.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  10 in total

1.  MRI for the diagnosis of recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma in children--can we optimize the technique? Preliminary study.

Authors:  Anne Geoffray; Myriam Guesmi; Jean François Nebbia; Béatrice Leloutre; Sonanda Bailleux; Claude Maschi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-11-18

2.  A tiny retraction of the pars flaccida may conceal an attic cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Geon Woo Kim; Hwi Kyeong Jung; Jae Moon Sung; Jae Soon Kim; Chang Woo Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Accuracy of turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging signal intensity measurements for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Burçe Özgen; Elif Bulut; Anıl Dolgun; Munir Demir Bajin; Levent Sennaroğlu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI in children and adolescents with cholesteatoma: reliability and pitfalls in comparison to middle ear surgery.

Authors:  Thekla von Kalle; Peter Amrhein; Assen Koitschev
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-13

5.  Use of non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of cholesteatomas in high-risk tympanic retraction pockets.

Authors:  A Alvo; C Garrido; Á Salas; G Miranda; C E Stott; P H Delano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Role of non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted images in the identification of recurrent cholesteatoma of the temporal bone.

Authors:  Andrea Romano; Edoardo Covelli; Veronica Confaloni; Maria Camilla Rossi-Espagnet; Giulia Butera; Maurizio Barbara; Alessandro Bozzao
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Optimal Duration of MRI Follow-up to Safely Identify Middle Ear Residual Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  A-L Fourez; M Akkari; G Gascou; P-H Lefevre; C Duflos; A Kaderbay; M Mondain; F Venail
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.966

8.  Diffusion weighted MR imaging of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma: an assessment by readers with different expertise.

Authors:  A Elefante; M Cavaliere; C Russo; G Caliendo; M Marseglia; D Cicala; D Piccolo; A Di Lullo; L Brunetti; A Palma; M Iengo; A Brunetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Non-echoplanar diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma: navigating beyond the pitfalls to find the pearl.

Authors:  Ravi K Lingam; Robert Nash; Anooj Majithia; Ali Kalan; Arvind Singh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-08-24

10.  The Role of Fusion Technique of Computed Tomography and Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Surgical Cholesteatoma Localization.

Authors:  Ayse Ozlem Balik; Lutfu Seneldir; Aysegul Verim; Sema Zer Toros
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2022-03-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.