Literature DB >> 21564463

Differences between proximal and distal obstructing colonic cancer after curative surgery.

R Frago1, S Biondo, M Millan, E Kreisler, T Golda, D Fraccalvieri, B Miguel, E Jaurrieta.   

Abstract

AIM: To study any possible differences in morbidity, mortality and overall survival rate after curative surgery for obstructive colon cancer according to tumour location.
METHOD: From January 1994 to December 2006, patients with colonic cancer presenting as obstruction were analysed. The two groups were defined as proximal and distal according to the tumour location with respect to the splenic flexure. In relation to the surgeon specialization, patients were operated on by a colorectal surgeon and by a general surgeon. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and cancer-related survival at 3 years were analysed.
RESULTS: Of the 377 patients included in the study, there were 173 patients (45.9%) in the proximal group and 204 patients (54.1%) in the distal group. The global morbidity was 54.9% without differences in postoperative morbidity except for anastomotic leakage, which was higher in the proximal group (P < 0.014). No differences in postoperative mortality were observed. After patients were stratified by the tumour node metastasis system, the differences between the groups, with respect to 3-year overall survival, cancer-related survival and probability of being free from recurrence, did not reach statistical significance. The overall survival after radical surgery for colonic obstruction was 57.6%.
CONCLUSION: Mortality and morbidity after emergency surgery for obstructing colon cancer are high. Specialization in colorectal surgery influences postoperative results in terms of lower anastomotic dehiscence rate after emergency proximal colon resection. After radical surgery, tumour location does not appear to influence the prognosis of obstructive colon cancer.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564463     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02549.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  11 in total

Review 1.  Emergency resection versus bridge to surgery with stenting in patients with acute right-sided colonic obstruction: a systematic review focusing on mortality and morbidity rates.

Authors:  F J Amelung; H W L de Beaufort; P D Siersema; P M Verheijen; E C J Consten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Emergency surgery for obstructing colonic cancer: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions.

Authors:  J-L Faucheron; B Paquette; B Trilling; B Heyd; S Koch; G Mantion
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Nomogram for Prediction of Postoperative Morbidity in Patients with Colon Cancer Requiring Emergency Therapy.

Authors:  Raul Mihailov; Dorel Firescu; Georgiana Bianca Constantin; Cristina Șerban; Eugenia Panaitescu; Cristian Marica; Rodica Bîrlă; Traian Patrascu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes Between Incomplete Obstructive Colon Cancer and Non-Obstructive Colon Cancer by Tumor Location.

Authors:  Ji Ha Lim; Woo Yong Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Yong Beom Cho; Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Jung Kyong Shin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Equivalent Operative Outcomes for Emergency Colon Cancer Resections Among Acute Care Surgeons and Specialists in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Ashley L Cairns; Alexis B Hess; Holly Rieken; Nicholas Lin; Shambavi Rao; Yoonsun Jee; Jean H Ashburn; Preston R Miller; Samuel P Carmichael; Nathan T Mowery
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 1.002

Review 6.  A Systematic Review Comparing Emergency Resection and Staged Treatment for Curable Obstructing Right-Sided Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jeske R E Boeding; Winesh Ramphal; Arjen M Rijken; Rogier M P H Crolla; Cornelis Verhoef; Paul D Gobardhan; Jennifer M J Schreinemakers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew S Miller; Kathryn Boyce; Benjamin Box; Matthew D Clarke; Sarah E Duff; Niamh M Foley; Richard J Guy; Lisa H Massey; George Ramsay; Dominic A J Slade; James A Stephenson; Phil J Tozer; Danette Wright
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.917

8.  Comparison of the long-term outcomes of the self-expandable metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Sato; Masaya Oikawa; Tetsuya Kakita; Takaho Okada; Atsushi Oyama; Tomoya Abe; Takashi Yazawa; Haruyuki Tsuchiya; Naoya Akazawa; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Megumi Tanaka; Haruka Okano; Kei Ito; Takashi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-01-29

9.  Bridge to Surgery for Obstructing Colonic Cancer: A Comparison between Right- and Left-sided Lesions.

Authors:  Kiyoaki Sugiura; Yuki Seo; Hikaru Aoki; Yoshihiko Onishi; Yusuke Nishi; Norihiro Kishida; Motomu Tanaka; Yasuhiro Ito; Hideyuki Tokura; Takayuki Takahashi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 10.  Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Roberta L Muldoon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.