Literature DB >> 21564282

Which psychoactive prescription drugs are illegally obtained and through which ways of acquisition? About OPPIDUM survey.

Elisabeth Frauger1, Sandra Nordmann, Veronica Orleans, Vincent Pradel, Vanessa Pauly, Xavier Thirion, Joëlle Micallef.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine which psychoactive prescription drugs are illegally obtained and through which ways of acquisition. OPPIDUM is an annual national study. It is based on specialized care centers that included subjects presenting a drug dependency or under opiate maintenance treatment. All their psychoactive substances consumed are reported. This work focuses on the different ways of acquisition specially the illegal ways of acquisition (bought on the street, forged prescription, stolen, given, internet). For each medication illegally obtained, a ratio has been calculated (number of illegal acquisitions divided by the number of described acquisitions). In 2008, 5542 subjects have been included and have described the consumption of 11 027 substances including 63.8% of prescription drugs. Among them, 11% were illegally obtained. The different illegal acquisition ways were 'street market' (77.6%), 'gift' (16.6%), 'theft' (2.3%), 'forged prescription' (2.3%), and 'internet' (0.7%). The third first drugs illegally obtained were high dosage buprenorphine, methadone, and clonazepam. Some prescription drugs, less consumed, have an important ratio of illegal acquisition like ketamine, flunitrazepam, morphine, trihexyphenidyl, or methylphenidate. This study confirms that theft, forged prescription and internet are few used and permits to highlight diversion of prescription drugs. It is important to inform healthcare professionals on the different prescription drugs that are illegally obtained.
© 2011 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21564282     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2011.00950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0767-3981            Impact factor:   2.748


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of gabapentin and pregabalin use and misuse: Results of a population-based cohort study in France.

Authors:  Damien Driot; Emilie Jouanjus; Stéphane Oustric; Julie Dupouy; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Multicentre study for validation of the French addictovigilance network reports assessment tool.

Authors:  Caroline Victorri-Vigneau; Jean Benoit Hardouin; Morgane Rousselet; Marie Gerardin; Marylène Guerlais; Morgane Guillou; Marie Bronnec; Véronique Sébille; Pascale Jolliet
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Buprenorphine Prescribing: To Expand or Not to Expand.

Authors:  Xiaofan Li; Daryl Shorter; Thomas R Kosten
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.325

4.  Prescription medication exchange patterns among methadone maintenance patients.

Authors:  Celeste M Caviness; Bradley J Anderson; Marcel A de Dios; Megan Kurth; Michael Stein
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Patterns of use and adverse events reported among persons who regularly inject buprenorphine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikki Bozinoff; Vitor Tardelli; Dafna Sara Rubin-Kahana; Bernard Le Foll
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.