Literature DB >> 21564239

The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning.

Michael Ramscar1, Daniel Yarlett, Melody Dye, Katie Denny, Kirsten Thorpe.   

Abstract

Symbols enable people to organize and communicate about the world. However, the ways in which symbolic knowledge is learned and then represented in the mind are poorly understood. We present a formal analysis of symbolic learning-in particular, word learning-in terms of prediction and cue competition, and we consider two possible ways in which symbols might be learned: by learning to predict a label from the features of objects and events in the world, and by learning to predict features from a label. This analysis predicts significant differences in symbolic learning depending on the sequencing of objects and labels. We report a computational simulation and two human experiments that confirm these differences, revealing the existence of Feature-Label-Ordering effects in learning. Discrimination learning is facilitated when objects predict labels, but not when labels predict objects. Our results and analysis suggest that the semantic categories people use to understand and communicate about the world can only be learned if labels are predicted from objects. We discuss the implications of this for our understanding of the nature of language and symbolic thought, and in particular, for theories of reference.
Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21564239     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  43 in total

1.  Seeking predictions from a predictive framework.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Victor Ferreira
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  A new experimental paradigm to study children's processing of their parent's unscripted language input.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Highlighting in Early Childhood: Learning Biases Through Attentional Shifting.

Authors:  Joseph M Burling; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-16

Review 4.  A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Matthew J Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Probabilistic cue combination: less is more.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Ty W Boyer; Linda B Smith; Chen Yu
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-12-18

6.  A social feedback loop for speech development and its reduction in autism.

Authors:  Anne S Warlaumont; Jeffrey A Richards; Jill Gilkerson; D Kimbrough Oller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 7.  The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution.

Authors:  Mutsumi Imai; Sotaro Kita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Observation versus classification in supervised category learning.

Authors:  Kimery R Levering; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

9.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

10.  Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Daniel I Brooks; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.