Literature DB >> 21563817

Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment.

Sebastien Humbert1, Julian D Marshall, Shanna Shaked, Joseph V Spadaro, Yurika Nishioka, Philipp Preiss, Thomas E McKone, Arpad Horvath, Olivier Jolliet.   

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) is a significant contributor to death and disease globally. This paper summarizes the work of an international expert group on the integration of human exposure to PM into life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), within the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. We review literature-derived intake fraction values (the fraction of emissions that are inhaled), based on emission release height and "archetypal" environment (indoor versus outdoor; urban, rural, or remote locations). Recommended intake fraction values are provided for primary PM(10-2.5) (coarse particles), primary PM(2.5) (fine particles), and secondary PM(2.5) from SO(2), NO(x), and NH(3). Intake fraction values vary by orders of magnitude among conditions considered. For outdoor primary PM(2.5), representative intake fraction values (units: milligrams inhaled per kilogram emitted) for urban, rural, and remote areas, respectively, are 44, 3.8, and 0.1 for ground-level emissions, versus 26, 2.6, and 0.1 for an emission-weighted stack height. For outdoor secondary PM, source location and source characteristics typically have only a minor influence on the magnitude of the intake fraction (exception: intake fraction values can be an order of magnitude lower for remote-location emission than for other locations). Outdoor secondary PM(2.5) intake fractions averaged over respective locations and stack heights are 0.89 (from SO(2)), 0.18 (NO(x)), and 1.7 (NH(3)). Estimated average intake fractions are greater for primary PM(10-2.5) than for primary PM(2.5) (21 versus 15), owing in part to differences in average emission height (lower, and therefore closer to people, for PM(10-2.5) than PM(2.5)). For indoor emissions, typical intake fraction values are ∼1000-7000. This paper aims to provide as complete and consistent an archetype framework as possible, given current understanding of each pollutant. Values presented here facilitate incorporating regional impacts into LCIA for human health damage from PM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563817     DOI: 10.1021/es103563z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Characterizing the burden of disease of particulate matter for life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Carina J Gronlund; Sebastien Humbert; Shanna Shaked; Marie S O'Neill; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Intra-urban variability of the intake fraction from multiple emission sources.

Authors:  Piotr Holnicki; Andrzej Kałuszko; Zbigniew Nahorski; Marko Tainio
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.352

3.  Environmental impacts of commuting modes in Lisbon: a life-cycle assessment addressing particulate matter impacts on health.

Authors:  Joana Bastos; Pedro Marques; Stuart A Batterman; Fausto Freire
Journal:  Int J Sustain Transp       Date:  2018-09-23

4.  Overview and recommendations for regionalized life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Chris Mutel; Xun Liao; Laure Patouillard; Jane Bare; Peter Fantke; Rolf Frischknecht; Michael Hauschild; Olivier Jolliet; Danielle Maia de Souza; Alexis Laurent; Stephan Pfister; Francesca Verones
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Global Effect Factors for Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Thomas E McKone; Marko Tainio; Olivier Jolliet; Joshua S Apte; Katerina S Stylianou; Nicole Illner; Julian D Marshall; Ernani F Choma; John S Evans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Intake Fraction of PM10 from Coal Mine Emissions in the North of Colombia.

Authors:  Heli A Arregocés; Roberto Rojano; Luis Angulo; Gloria Restrepo
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-07-29

7.  Fine-scale damage estimates of particulate matter air pollution reveal opportunities for location-specific mitigation of emissions.

Authors:  Andrew L Goodkind; Christopher W Tessum; Jay S Coggins; Jason D Hill; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Global intraurban intake fractions for primary air pollutants from vehicles and other distributed sources.

Authors:  Joshua S Apte; Emilie Bombrun; Julian D Marshall; William W Nazaroff
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Building-related health impacts in European and Chinese cities: a scalable assessment method.

Authors:  Jouni T Tuomisto; Marjo Niittynen; Erkki Pärjälä; Arja Asikainen; Laura Perez; Stephan Trüeb; Matti Jantunen; Nino Künzli; Clive E Sabel
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Human Health Benefits from Fish Consumption vs. Risks from Inhalation Exposures Associated with Contaminated Sediment Remediation: Dredging of the Hudson River.

Authors:  Jacob Kvasnicka; Katerina S Stylianou; Vy K Nguyen; Lei Huang; Weihsueh A Chiu; G Allen Burton; Jeremy Semrau; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.