Literature DB >> 21563754

Consensus 3D model of μ-opioid receptor ligand efficacy based on a quantitative Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore.

Jihyun Shim1, Andrew Coop, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Despite being studied for over 30 years, a consensus structure-activity relationship (SAR) that encompasses the full range peptidic and nonpeptidic μ-opioid receptor ligands is still not available. To achieve a consensus SAR the Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore (CSP) method was applied to develop a predictive model of the efficacy of μ-opioid receptor ligands. Emphasis was placed on predicting the efficacy of a wide range of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists as well as understanding their mode of interaction with the receptor. Inclusion of all accessible conformations of each ligand, a central feature of the CSP method, enabled structural features between diverse μ-opioid receptor ligands that dictate efficacy to be identified. The models were validated against a diverse collection of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands, including an class="Chemical">benzomorphans, n class="Chemical">fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine), methadone (3,3-diphenylpropylamines), etonitazene (benzimidazole derivatives), funaltrexamine (C6-substituted 4,5-epoxymorphinan), and herkinorin. The model predicts (1) that interactions of ligands with the B site, as with the 19-alkyl substituents of oripavines, modulate the extent of agonism; (2) that agonists with long N-substituents, as with fentanyl and N-phenethylnormorphine, can bind in an orientation such that the N substitutent interacts with the B site that also allows the basic N-receptor Asp interaction essential for agonism; and (3) that the μ agonist herkinorin, that lacks a basic nitrogen, binds to the receptor in a manner similar to the traditional opioids via interactions mediated by water or a ion. Importantly, the proposed CSP model can be reconciled with previously published SAR models for the μ receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563754      PMCID: PMC3113728          DOI: 10.1021/jp202542g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  74 in total

1.  2D conformationally sampled pharmacophore: a ligand-based pharmacophore to differentiate delta opioid agonists from antagonists.

Authors:  Denzil Bernard; Andrew Coop; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  QSAR study of 4-phenylpiperidine derivatives as mu opioid agonists by neural network method.

Authors:  Xing-hai Wang; Yun Tang; Qiong Xie; Zhui-bai Qiu
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Molecular modeling studies to predict the possible binding modes of endomorphin analogs in mu opioid receptor.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Ming Kai; Lian Jin; Rui Wang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications.

Authors:  L Toll; I P Berzetei-Gurske; W E Polgar; S R Brandt; I D Adapa; L Rodriguez; R W Schwartz; D Haggart; A O'Brien; A White; J M Kennedy; K Craymer; L Farrington; J S Auh
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1998-03

5.  Ligand recognition in mu opioid receptor: experimentally based modeling of mu opioid receptor binding sites and their testing by ligand docking.

Authors:  T Sagara; H Egashira; M Okamura; I Fujii; Y Shimohigashi; K Kanematsu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Mechanistic structure-activity studies of peptide and nonpeptide flexible opioids: an interdisciplinary approach.

Authors:  G H Loew; L Toll; E Uyeno; A Cheng; A Judd; J Lawson; C Keys; P Amsterdam; W Polgar
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1986

7.  Proposal for the biologically active conformation of opiates and enkephalin.

Authors:  F A Gorin; G R Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Differential effects of naltrindole on morphine-induced tolerance and physical dependence in rats.

Authors:  M J Hepburn; P J Little; J Gingras; C M Kuhn
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  Regulated endocytosis of opioid receptors: cellular mechanisms and proposed roles in physiological adaptation to opiate drugs.

Authors:  Mark von Zastrow; Adena Svingos; Helena Haberstock-Debic; Chris Evans
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of 14-alkoxymorphinans. 20. 14-phenylpropoxymetopon: an extremely powerful analgesic.

Authors:  Johannes Schütz; Mariana Spetea; Martin Koch; Mario D Aceto; Louis S Harris; Andrew Coop; Helmut Schmidhammer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  11 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

2.  Force Fields for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

3.  Conformational Heterogeneity of Intracellular Loop 3 of the μ-opioid G-protein Coupled Receptor.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Andrew Coop; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Synthesis, modeling, and pharmacological evaluation of UMB 425, a mixed μ agonist/δ antagonist opioid analgesic with reduced tolerance liabilities.

Authors:  Jason R Healy; Padmavani Bezawada; Jihyun Shim; Jace W Jones; Maureen A Kane; Alexander D MacKerell; Andrew Coop; Rae R Matsumoto
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.418

5.  Estimation of ligand efficacies of metabotropic glutamate receptors from conformational forces obtained from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Fengtian Xue; Alan I Faden; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Molecular details of the activation of the μ opioid receptor.

Authors:  Jihyun Shim; Andrew Coop; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Determination of structural factors affecting binding to mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors.

Authors:  Svetoslav Slavov; William Mattes; Richard D Beger
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  A DFT and semiempirical model-based study of opioid receptor affinity and selectivity in a group of molecules with a morphine structural core.

Authors:  Tamara Bruna-Larenas; Juan S Gómez-Jeria
Journal:  Int J Med Chem       Date:  2012-12-13

9.  Drug Binding Poses Relate Structure with Efficacy in the μ Opioid Receptor.

Authors:  Katy J Sutcliffe; Graeme Henderson; Eamonn Kelly; Richard B Sessions
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Predicting opioid receptor binding affinity of pharmacologically unclassified designer substances using molecular docking.

Authors:  Christopher R Ellis; Naomi L Kruhlak; Marlene T Kim; Edward G Hawkins; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.