Jihyun Shim1, Andrew Coop, Alexander D MacKerell. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Abstract
Despite being studied for over 30 years, a consensus structure-activity relationship (SAR) that encompasses the full range peptidic and nonpeptidic μ-opioid receptor ligands is still not available. To achieve a consensus SAR the Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore (CSP) method was applied to develop a predictive model of the efficacy of μ-opioid receptor ligands. Emphasis was placed on predicting the efficacy of a wide range of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists as well as understanding their mode of interaction with the receptor. Inclusion of all accessible conformations of each ligand, a central feature of the CSP method, enabled structural features between diverse μ-opioid receptor ligands that dictate efficacy to be identified. The models were validated against a diverse collection of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands, including benzomorphans, fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine), methadone (3,3-diphenylpropylamines), etonitazene (benzimidazole derivatives), funaltrexamine (C6-substituted 4,5-epoxymorphinan), and herkinorin. The model predicts (1) that interactions of ligands with the B site, as with the 19-alkyl substituents of oripavines, modulate the extent of agonism; (2) that agonists with long N-substituents, as with fentanyl and N-phenethylnormorphine, can bind in an orientation such that the N substitutent interacts with the B site that also allows the basic N-receptor Asp interaction essential for agonism; and (3) that the μ agonist herkinorin, that lacks a basic nitrogen, binds to the receptor in a manner similar to the traditional opioids via interactions mediated by water or a ion. Importantly, the proposed CSP model can be reconciled with previously published SAR models for the μ receptor.
Despite being studied for over 30 years, a consensus structure-activity relationship (SAR) that encompasses the full range peptidic and nonpeptidic μ-opioid receptor ligands is still not available. To achieve a consensus SAR the Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore (CSP) method was applied to develop a predictive model of the efficacy of μ-opioid receptor ligands. Emphasis was placed on predicting the efficacy of a wide range of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists as well as understanding their mode of interaction with the receptor. Inclusion of all accessible conformations of each ligand, a central feature of the CSP method, enabled structural features between diverse μ-opioid receptor ligands that dictate efficacy to be identified. The models were validated against a diverse collection of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands, including an class="Chemical">benzomorphans, n class="Chemical">fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine), methadone (3,3-diphenylpropylamines), etonitazene (benzimidazole derivatives), funaltrexamine (C6-substituted 4,5-epoxymorphinan), and herkinorin. The model predicts (1) that interactions of ligands with the B site, as with the 19-alkyl substituents of oripavines, modulate the extent of agonism; (2) that agonists with long N-substituents, as with fentanyl and N-phenethylnormorphine, can bind in an orientation such that the N substitutent interacts with the B site that also allows the basic N-receptor Asp interaction essential for agonism; and (3) that the μ agonist herkinorin, that lacks a basic nitrogen, binds to the receptor in a manner similar to the traditional opioids via interactions mediated by water or a ion. Importantly, the proposed CSP model can be reconciled with previously published SAR models for the μ receptor.
Authors: L Toll; I P Berzetei-Gurske; W E Polgar; S R Brandt; I D Adapa; L Rodriguez; R W Schwartz; D Haggart; A O'Brien; A White; J M Kennedy; K Craymer; L Farrington; J S Auh Journal: NIDA Res Monogr Date: 1998-03
Authors: Johannes Schütz; Mariana Spetea; Martin Koch; Mario D Aceto; Louis S Harris; Andrew Coop; Helmut Schmidhammer Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-09-11 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Jason R Healy; Padmavani Bezawada; Jihyun Shim; Jace W Jones; Maureen A Kane; Alexander D MacKerell; Andrew Coop; Rae R Matsumoto Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Christopher R Ellis; Naomi L Kruhlak; Marlene T Kim; Edward G Hawkins; Lidiya Stavitskaya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240