OBJECTIVES: Cultivating healthy workplaces is a critical aspect of comprehensive worksite health promotion. The influence of healthy workplace exposures on employee health outcomes warrants research attention. To date, it is unknown if nature contact in the workplace is related to employee stress and health. This study was designed to examine the effects of nature contact experienced at work on employee stress and health. METHODS: Office staff at a southeastern university (n = 503, 30% response rate) participated in the cross-sectional study. We used a 16-item workplace environment questionnaire, the Nature Contact Questionnaire, to comprehensively measure, for the first time, nature contact at work. The Perceived Stress Questionnaire and 13 established health and behavioral items assessed the dependent variables, general perceived stress, stress-related health behaviors, and stress-related health outcomes. RESULTS: There was a significant, negative association between nature contact and stress and nature contact and general health complaints. The results indicate that as workday nature contact increased, perceived stress and generalized health complaints decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nature contact is a healthy workplace exposure. Increasing nature contact at work may offer a simple population-based approach to enhance workplace health promotion efforts. Future researchers should test the efficacy of nature-contact workplace stress interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Cultivating healthy workplaces is a critical aspect of comprehensive worksite health promotion. The influence of healthy workplace exposures on employee health outcomes warrants research attention. To date, it is unknown if nature contact in the workplace is related to employee stress and health. This study was designed to examine the effects of nature contact experienced at work on employee stress and health. METHODS: Office staff at a southeastern university (n = 503, 30% response rate) participated in the cross-sectional study. We used a 16-item workplace environment questionnaire, the Nature Contact Questionnaire, to comprehensively measure, for the first time, nature contact at work. The Perceived Stress Questionnaire and 13 established health and behavioral items assessed the dependent variables, general perceived stress, stress-related health behaviors, and stress-related health outcomes. RESULTS: There was a significant, negative association between nature contact and stress and nature contact and general health complaints. The results indicate that as workday nature contact increased, perceived stress and generalized health complaints decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that nature contact is a healthy workplace exposure. Increasing nature contact at work may offer a simple population-based approach to enhance workplace health promotion efforts. Future researchers should test the efficacy of nature-contact workplace stress interventions.
Authors: David Berrigan; Kevin Dodd; Richard P Troiano; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Rachel Ballard Barbash Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Mark J Mendell; William J Fisk; Kathleen Kreiss; Hal Levin; Darryl Alexander; William S Cain; John R Girman; Cynthia J Hines; Paul A Jensen; Donald K Milton; Larry P Rexroat; Kenneth M Wallingford Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gregory N Bratman; Christopher B Anderson; Marc G Berman; Bobby Cochran; Sjerp de Vries; Jon Flanders; Carl Folke; Howard Frumkin; James J Gross; Terry Hartig; Peter H Kahn; Ming Kuo; Joshua J Lawler; Phillip S Levin; Therese Lindahl; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Richard Mitchell; Zhiyun Ouyang; Jenny Roe; Lynn Scarlett; Jeffrey R Smith; Matilda van den Bosch; Benedict W Wheeler; Mathew P White; Hua Zheng; Gretchen C Daily Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Ana Margarida Alves; Alexandre Rodrigues; Pedro Sa-Couto; João Lindo Simões Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Po Lam Ho; Tsz Wai Li; Huinan Liu; Tsun Fung Yeung; Wai Kai Hou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390