Literature DB >> 21563579

Managing soil nitrogen to restore annual grass-infested plant communities: effective strategy or incomplete framework?

J J James1, R E Drenovsky, T A Monaco, M J Rinella.   

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical work has established a positive relationship between resource availability and habitat invasibility. For nonnative invasive annual grasses, similar to other invasive species, invader success has been tied most often to increased nitrogen (N) availability. These observations have led to the logical assumption that managing soils for low N availability will facilitate restoration of invasive plant-dominated systems. Although invasive annual grasses pose a serious threat to a number of perennial-dominated ecosystems worldwide, there has been no quantitative synthesis evaluating the degree to which soil N management may facilitate restoration efforts. We used meta-analysis to evaluate the degree to which soil N management impacts growth and competitive ability of annual and perennial grass seedlings. We then link our analysis to current theories of plant ecological strategies and community assembly to improve our ability to understand how soil N management may be used to restore annual grass-dominated communities. Across studies, annual grasses maintained higher growth rates and greater biomass and tiller production than perennials under low and high N availability. We found no evidence that lowering N availability fundamentally alters competitive interactions between annual and perennial grass seedlings. Competitive effects of annual neighbors on perennial targets were similar under low and high N availability. Moreover, in most cases perennials grown under competition in high-N soils produced more biomass than perennials grown under competition in low-N soils. While these findings counter current restoration and soil N management assumptions, these results are consistent with current plant ecological strategy and community assembly theory. Based on our results and these theories we argue that, in restoration scenarios in which the native plant community is being reassembled from seed, soil N management will have no direct positive effect on native plant establishment unless invasive plant propagule pools and priority effects are controlled the first growing season.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563579     DOI: 10.1890/10-0280.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

Review 1.  A functional trait perspective on plant invasion.

Authors:  Rebecca E Drenovsky; Brenda J Grewell; Carla M D'Antonio; Jennifer L Funk; Jeremy J James; Nicole Molinari; Ingrid M Parker; Christina L Richards
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Annual grass invasion in sagebrush steppe: the relative importance of climate, soil properties and biotic interactions.

Authors:  Sheel Bansal; Roger L Sheley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Plant communities in harsh sites are less invaded: a summary of observations and proposed explanations.

Authors:  Emily Zefferman; Jens T Stevens; Grace K Charles; Mila Dunbar-Irwin; Taraneh Emam; Stephen Fick; Laura V Morales; Kristina M Wolf; Derek J N Young; Truman P Young
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Refining the cheatgrass-fire cycle in the Great Basin: Precipitation timing and fine fuel composition predict wildfire trends.

Authors:  David S Pilliod; Justin L Welty; Robert S Arkle
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments.

Authors:  Jennifer L Funk
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  The Effect of Nitrogen Deposition on Plant Performance and Community Structure: Is It Life Stage Specific?

Authors:  Elise M Tulloss; Mary L Cadenasso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.