Literature DB >> 21563578

Burn severity influences postfire CO2 exchange in arctic tundra.

Adrian V Rocha1, Gaius R Shaver.   

Abstract

Burned landscapes present several challenges to quantifying landscape carbon balance. Fire scars are composed of a mosaic of patches that differ in burn severity, which may influence postfire carbon budgets through damage to vegetation and carbon stocks. We deployed three eddy covariance towers along a burn severity gradient (i.e., severely burned, moderately burned, and unburned tundra) to monitor postfire net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) within the large 2007 Anaktuvuk River fire scar in Alaska, USA, during the summer of 2008. Remote sensing data from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) was used to assess the spatial representativeness of the tower sites and parameterize a NEE model that was used to scale tower measurements to the landscape. The tower sites had similar vegetation and reflectance properties prior to the Anaktuvuk River fire and represented the range of surface conditions observed within the fire scar during the 2008 summer. Burn severity influenced a variety of surface properties, including residual organic matter, plant mortality, and vegetation recovery, which in turn determined postfire NEE. Carbon sequestration decreased with increased burn severity and was largely controlled by decreases in canopy photosynthesis. The MODIS two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) monitored the seasonal course of surface greenness and explained 86% of the variability in NEE across the burn severity gradient. We demonstrate that understanding the relationship between burn severity, surface reflectance, and NEE is critical for estimating the overall postfire carbon balance of the Anaktuvuk River fire scar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563578     DOI: 10.1890/10-0255.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Pan-Arctic modelling of net ecosystem exchange of CO2.

Authors:  G R Shaver; E B Rastetter; V Salmon; L E Street; M J van de Weg; A Rocha; M T van Wijk; M Williams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A gradient of nutrient enrichment reveals nonlinear impacts of fertilization on Arctic plant diversity and ecosystem function.

Authors:  Case M Prager; Shahid Naeem; Natalie T Boelman; Jan U H Eitel; Heather E Greaves; Mary A Heskel; Troy S Magney; Duncan N L Menge; Lee A Vierling; Kevin L Griffin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets.

Authors:  Bruno D V Marino; Martina Mincheva; Aaron Doucett
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effects of fire on CO2 , CH4 , and N2 O exchange in a well-drained Arctic heath ecosystem.

Authors:  Lena Hermesdorf; Bo Elberling; Ludovica D'Imperio; Wenyi Xu; Anders Lambaek; Per L Ambus
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 13.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.