Literature DB >> 21563025

Anaerobic capacity: effect of computational method.

D A Noordhof1, A M T Vink, J J de Koning, C Foster.   

Abstract

Anaerobic capacity (AnC) can be estimated by subtracting VO (2) consumed from VO (2) demand, which can be estimated from multiple submaximal exercise bouts or by gross efficiency (GE), requiring one submaximal bout. This study compares AnC using the MAOD and GE method. The precision of estimated VO (2) demand and AnC, determined by MAOD using 3 power output - VO (2) regressions, based on VO (2) from min 8-10 (10 - Y), during min 4 without (4 - Y) and with forced y-intercept (4+Y), and from GE was evaluated by the 95% confidence interval (CI). Well-trained males (n=15) performed submaximal exercise tests to establish VO (2) demand with the MAOD and GE method. To determine AnC subjects completed a constant power output trial. The 3 MAOD procedures and GE method had no significant difference for VO (2) demand and AnC. The 4+Y MAOD procedure and GE method resulted in a smaller 95% CI of VO (2) demand and AnC than the 10 - Y ( P<0.05; P<0.01) and 4 - Y ( P<0.001; P<0.01) MAOD procedures. Therefore, the 4+Y MAOD procedure and GE method are preferred for estimating AnC, but as individual differences exist, they cannot be used interchangeably. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21563025     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tabata training: one of the most energetically effective high-intensity intermittent training methods.

Authors:  Izumi Tabata
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Anaerobic Capacity in Running: The Effect of Computational Method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Glenn Björklund; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Philipp Bachl; Anna Schmuttermair; Craig A Staunton; Thomas L Stöggl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Validity of sports watches when estimating energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Lilian Roos; Wolfgang Taube; Nadja Beeler; Thomas Wyss
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Exploring the performance reserve: Effect of different magnitudes of power output deception on 4,000 m cycling time-trial performance.

Authors:  Mark R Stone; Kevin Thomas; Michael Wilkinson; Emma Stevenson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Andrew M Jones; Kevin G Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Anaerobic Capacityestimated in A Single Supramaximal Test in Cycling: Validity and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Willian Eiji Miyagi; Rodrigo de Araujo Bonetti de Poli; Marcelo Papoti; Romulo Bertuzzi; Alessandro Moura Zagatto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Anaerobic Capacity of Cross-Country Skiers: The Effect of Computational Method and Skiing Sub-technique.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Dionne A Noordhof; Nestor Lögdal
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  The Dynamics of the Anaerobic Energy Contribution During a Simulated Mass-Start Competition While Roller-Ski Skating on a Treadmill.

Authors:  Dionne A Noordhof; Marius Lyng Danielsson; Knut Skovereng; Jørgen Danielsen; Trine M Seeberg; Pål Haugnes; Jan Kocbach; Gertjan Ettema; Øyvind B Sandbakk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-07-08

9.  A Comparison between Different Methods of Estimating Anaerobic Energy Production.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.