Literature DB >> 21562794

Evaluation of sediment quality guidelines derived using the screening-level concentration approach for application at uranium operations in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Charlene Burnett-Seidel1, Karsten Liber.   

Abstract

Sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) can be derived using different approaches and are commonly used in environmental management, reclamation, and risk assessment. The screening-level concentration (SLC) approach has been used in Ontario, Canada, to derive lowest effect levels (LELs) and severe effect levels for use as SQGs. This approach was adopted by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to set guidelines for metals (As, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mo, Ni, Se, U, and V) and radionuclides (Ra-226, Pb-210, and Po-210) in sediment at northern Saskatchewan uranium mining and milling operations. The SLC approach is based on total metal and radionuclide concentrations in sediment, and corresponding benthic community composition data for a specific sampling site. In this study, sediment chemistry (total metals and radionuclides) and benthic community data from northern Saskatchewan uranium operations were compiled and examined. Results indicate that the CNSC-derived SQGs had limited relationships to observed effects, or lack thereof, on benthic invertebrate communities near uranium operations in Saskatchewan. The LELs were found to correctly align with effects at 95% of the sites that had effects, on a general basis, but on an element-specific basis many of the elements had concentrations at effect sites below their LELs. Furthermore, concentrations of the evaluated elements exceeded at least one LEL at 60% of the no-effect sites. The high number of exceedences of LELs at reference and no-effect sites (false-positives) calls to question the appropriateness of the CNSC-derived SQGs. It is suggested that alternatives to the SLC approach be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562794     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2063-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  D D MacDonald; C G Ingersoll; T A Berger
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A cautionary note on the use of species presence and absence data in deriving sediment criteria.

Authors:  Stackelberg Katherine von; Charles A Menzie
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Applications of numerical sediment quality targets for assessing sediment quality conditions in a US Great Lakes Area of Concern.

Authors:  Judy L Crane; Donald D MacDonald
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Quantifying uncertainties in the assessment of sediment quality: statistical criteria and guidelines for sediment quality assessments.

Authors:  Y H Chang; M D Scrimshaw; J N Lester
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.247

5.  Using sediment quality guidelines for dredged material management in commercial ports from Spain.

Authors:  M C Casado-Martínez; J L Buceta; M J Belzunce; T A Delvalls
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Derivation and use of sediment quality guidelines for ecological risk assessment of metals and radionuclides released to the environment from uranium mining and milling activities in Canada.

Authors:  P A Thompson; J Kurias; S Mihok
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 7.  Calculation and uses of mean sediment quality guideline quotients: a critical review.

Authors:  Edward R Long; Christopher G Ingersoll; Donald D MacDonald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Evaluation of numerical sediment quality targets for the St. Louis River Area of Concern.

Authors:  J L Crane; D D MacDonald; C G Ingersoll; D E Smorong; R A Lindskoog; C G Severn; T A Berger; L J Field
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Comparative sediment quality guideline performance for predicting sediment toxicity in southern California, USA.

Authors:  Doris E Vidal; Steven M Bay
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.742

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Derivation of no-effect and reference-level sediment quality values for application at Saskatchewan uranium operations.

Authors:  Charlene Burnett-Seidel; Karsten Liber
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Impact of environmentally based chemical hardness on uranium speciation and toxicity in six aquatic species.

Authors:  Richard R Goulet; Patsy A Thompson; Kerrie C Serben; Curtis V Eickhoff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Spatial Evaluation of Heavy Metals Concentrations in the Surface Sediment of Taihu Lake.

Authors:  Yong Niu; Wei Jiao; Hui Yu; Yuan Niu; Yong Pang; Xiangyang Xu; Xiaochun Guo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.