Literature DB >> 21562027

Plants in a crowded stand regulate their height growth so as to maintain similar heights to neighbours even when they have potential advantages in height growth.

Hisae Nagashima1, Kouki Hikosaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although being tall is advantageous in light competition, plant height growth is often similar among dominant plants in crowded stands (height convergence). Previous theoretical studies have suggested that plants should not overtop neighbours because greater allocation to supporting tissues is necessary in taller plants, which in turn lowers leaf mass fraction and thus carbon gain. However, this model assumes that a competitor has the same potential of height growth as their neighbours, which does not necessarily account for the fact that height convergence occurs even among individuals with various biomass.
METHODS: Stands of individually potted plants of Chenopodium album were established, where target plants were lifted to overtop neighbours or lowered to be overtopped. Lifted plants were expected to keep overtopping because they intercept more light without increased allocation to stems, or to regulate their height to similar levels of neighbours, saving biomass allocation to the supporting organ. Lowered plants were expected to be suppressed due to the low light availability or to increase height growth so as to have similar height to the neighbours. KEY
RESULTS: Lifted plants reduced height growth in spite of the fact that they received higher irradiance than others. Lowered plants, on the other hand, increased the rate of stem elongation despite the reduced irradiance. Consequently, lifted and lowered plants converged to the same height. In contrast to the expectation, lifted plants did not increase allocation to leaf mass despite the decreased stem length. Rather, they allocated more biomass to roots, which might contribute to improvement of mechanical stability or water status. It is suggested that decreased leaf mass fraction is not the sole cost of overtopping neighbours. Wind blowing, which may enhance transpiration and drag force, might constrain growth of overtopping plants.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that plants in crowded stands regulate their height growth to maintain similar height to neighbours even when they have potential advantages in height growth. This might contribute to avoidance of stresses caused by wind blowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562027      PMCID: PMC3119620          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  17 in total

Review 1.  Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants--an emerging synthesis.

Authors:  H Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence.

Authors:  Carlos L Ballaré
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 7.228

3.  Reproductive yield of individuals competing for light in a dense stand of an annual, Xanthium canadense.

Authors:  Yosuke Matsumoto; Shimpei Oikawa; Yuko Yasumura; Tadaki Hirose; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Interactive effects of spectral shading and mechanical stress on the expression and costs of shade avoidance.

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Eric J von Wettberg; Marcin Pawlowski; Heidrun Huber
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies.

Authors:  C L Ballaré; A L Scopel; R A Sánchez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ontogenetic changes in size, allometry, and mechanical design of tropical rain forest trees.

Authors:  F Sterck; F Bongers
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Size and shape in biology.

Authors:  T McMahon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces.

Authors:  Olga Speck
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Temperature and transpiration resistances of xanthium leaves as affected by air temperature, humidity, and wind speed.

Authors:  B G Drake; K Raschke; F B Salisbury
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth, and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants.

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Raquel Casado-Garcia; Hisae Nagashima
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  8 in total

1.  Is the positive relationship between species richness and shoot morphological plasticity mediated by ramet density or is there a direct link?

Authors:  Mari Lepik; Kristjan Zobel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Optimality of nitrogen distribution among leaves in plant canopies.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  The role of biomass allocation between lamina and petioles in a game of light competition in a dense stand of an annual plant.

Authors:  Kenta Yoshinaka; Hisae Nagashima; Yusuke Yanagita; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Does intrinsic light heterogeneity in Ricinus communis L. monospecific thickets drive species' population dynamics?

Authors:  Neha Goyal; Kanhaiya Shah; Gyan Prakash Sharma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Sowing Density: A Neglected Factor Fundamentally Affecting Root Distribution and Biomass Allocation of Field Grown Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.).

Authors:  Vera L Hecht; Vicky M Temperton; Kerstin A Nagel; Uwe Rascher; Johannes A Postma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Decision-making in plants under competition.

Authors:  Michal Gruntman; Dorothee Groß; Maria Májeková; Katja Tielbörger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Ecophysiological characteristics of five weeds and a wheat crop in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India.

Authors:  Vartika Singh; Sweta Gupta; Hema Singh; Akhilesh Singh Raghubanshi
Journal:  Weed Biol Manag       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Turning plant interactions upside down: Light signals from below matter.

Authors:  Ningyi Zhang; Jochem B Evers; Niels P R Anten; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 7.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.