Literature DB >> 21561734

A formal comparison of different methods for establishing cut points to distinguish positive and negative samples in immunoassays.

Thomas Jaki1, John-Philip Lawo, Martin J Wolfsegger, Julia Singer, Peter Allacher, Frank Horling.   

Abstract

Biotechnology derived therapeutics may induce an unwanted immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). As a result the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic protein could be impaired. Neutralizing antibodies may, for example, affect pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic protein or induce autoimmunity. Therefore a drug induced immune response is a major concern and needs to be assessed during drug development. It is therefore crucial to have assays available for the detection and characterization of ADAs. These assays are used to classify samples in positive and negative samples based on a cut point. In this manuscript we investigate the performance of established and newly developed methods to determine a cut point in immunoassays such as ELISA through simulation and analysis of real data. The different methods are found to have different advantages and disadvantages. A robust parametric approach generally resulted in very good results and can be recommended for many situations. The newly introduced method based on mixture models yields similar results to the robust parametric approach but offers some additional flexibility at the expense of higher complexity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561734     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  6 in total

1.  Mitigation of Pre-existing Antibodies to a Biotherapeutic in Non-clinical Species When Establishing Anti-drug Antibody Assay Cutpoint.

Authors:  Seema C Kumar; Jason A DelCarpini; Qiang Qu; Martin Kane; Boris Gorovits
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Study of a Cohort of 1,886 Persons To Determine Changes in Antibody Reactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi 3 Months after a Tick Bite.

Authors:  Ram B Dessau; Linda Fryland; Peter Wilhelmsson; Christina Ekerfelt; Dag Nyman; Pia Forsberg; Per-Eric Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-05-20

3.  A novel differential diagnostic model based on multiple biological parameters for immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Yong Wang; Zhennan Dong; Zhangming Yan; Xingwang Jia; Yaping Tian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  A non-invasive diagnostic model of immunoglobulin A nephropathy and serological markers for evaluating disease severity.

Authors:  Qiu-Xia Han; Yong Wang; Han-Yu Zhu; Dong Zhang; Jing Gao; Zhang-Suo Liu; Guang-Yan Cai; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Prevalence and Incidence of Non-neutralizing Antibodies in Congenital Hemophilia A- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  A Abdi; M R Bordbar; S Hassan; F R Rosendaal; J G van der Bom; J Voorberg; K Fijnvandraat; S C Gouw
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Evaluation of nonneutralizing antibodies against factor VIII in severe haemophilia A patients from India.

Authors:  Sachin David; Nitty S Mathews; G Surender Singh; Anu Korula; Fouzia Nambiatheyil Aboobacker; Aby Abraham; Biju George; Alok Srivastava; Vikram Mathews; Sukesh C Nair
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.276

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.