| Literature DB >> 21561522 |
Abstract
This article challenges recent assumptions that physicians may ethically and legally prescribe psychopharmacological enhancement drugs to patients and the counterintuitive notion that in some cases ingesting an enhancement drug constitutes the more ethical choice than foregoing this option. Enhancement proponents have touted modafinil as an ideal mechanism to improve concentration, alertness, and forego sleep and keep pace with our society's demands. However, patients who use modafinil for these reasons risk potentially severe side effects and addiction, and face unintended consequences related to their cognitive, emotive, and physiological functioning. Importantly, prescribing a controlled substance such as modafinil for performance enhancement and sleep avoidance runs contrary to a physician's ethical duty to the patient and the standard of practice set forth in legal requirements governing the prescription of controlled substances.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21561522 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00596.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Law Med Ethics ISSN: 1073-1105 Impact factor: 1.718