Literature DB >> 21561483

Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two different biomaterials.

Nikos Mardas1, Francesco D'Aiuto, Luis Mezzomo, Marina Arzoumanidi, Nikolaos Donos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate radiographical bone changes following alveolar ridge preservation with a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine xenograft.
METHODS: Alveolar ridge preservation was performed in 27 patients randomized in two groups. In the test group (n=14), the extraction socket was treated with Straumann bone ceramic(®) (SBC) and a collagen barrier membrane (Bio-Gide(®)), whereas in the control group (n=13) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral and the same barrier. Standardized periapical X-rays were taken at 4 time points, BL: after tooth extraction, GR: immediately after socket grafting, 4M: 16 weeks, 8M: 32 weeks post-operatively. The levels of the alveolar bone crest at the mesial (Mh), and distal (Dh) and central aspects of the socket were measured at all time points. All the radiographs obtained were subtracted from the follow-up images. The gain, loss and unchanged areas in terms of grey values were tested for significant difference between the two groups.
RESULTS: In the test group, the Mh and Dh showed a mean difference (± standard deviation) of 0.9 ± 1.2 and 0.7 ± 1.8 mm, respectively, among BL-8M. In the control group, the Mh and Dh showed a mean difference of 0.4 ± 1.3 and 0.7 ± 1.3 mm, respectively (P>0.05). Both treatments presented similar gain in grey values between BL-GR, BL-4M and BL-8M. The SBC presented less loss in grey values between BL-4M and BL-8M (P<0.05). Radiographic assessment underestimated the intrasurgical measurements (mesial and distal) of an average 0.3 mm (95% CI, 0.02-0.6).
CONCLUSION: Both types of bone grafts presented similar radiographic alveolar bone changes when used for alveolar ridge preservation.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561483     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

Review 1.  Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Attila Horváth; Nikos Mardas; Luis André Mezzomo; Ian G Needleman; Nikos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Avila-Ortiz; S Elangovan; K W O Kramer; D Blanchette; D V Dawson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Osteogain® loaded onto an absorbable collagen sponge induces attachment and osteoblast differentiation of ST2 cells in vitro.

Authors:  Richard J Miron; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Yufeng Zhang; Anton Sculean; Benjamin Pippenger; Yoshinori Shirakata; Umadevi Kandalam; Maria Hernandez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  To assess the efficacy of socket plug technique using platelet rich fibrin with or without the use of bone substitute in alveolar ridge preservation: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  N Girish Kumar; Rupanzal Chaudhary; Ish Kumar; Srimathy S Arora; Nilesh Kumar; Hem Singh
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-06

Review 5.  Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants.

Authors:  Pâmela Letícia Santos; Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli; Cristino da Silva Telles; Walter Betoni Júnior; Roberta Okamoto; Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani; Thallita Pereira Queiroz
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-12-12

6.  Clinical, radiographical and histological evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation with an autogenous tooth derived particulate graft in EDS class 3-4 defects.

Authors:  Balint Molnar; Gabor Gerber; Zsombor Radoczy-Drajko; Peter Windisch; Eszter Svidro; Peter Tajti
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Retrospective study of alveolar ridge preservation compared with no alveolar ridge preservation in periodontally compromised extraction sockets.

Authors:  Jungwon Lee; Junseob Yun; Jung-Ju Kim; Ki-Tae Koo; Yang-Jo Seol; Yong-Moo Lee
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-26

8.  Ridge preservation applying a novel hydrogel for early angiogenesis and osteogenesis evaluation: an experimental study in canine.

Authors:  Shuai Yuan; Qingshu Li; Kaiwen Chen; Zhixiang Mu; Tao Chen; Huanan Wang; Ping Ji
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Bone repair access of BoneCeramic™ in 5-mm defects: study on rat calvaria.

Authors:  André Luis da Silva Fabris; Leonardo Perez Faverani; Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes-Ferreira; Tárik Ocon Braga Polo; Joel Ferreira Santiago-Júnior; Roberta Okamoto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Absorbable collagen sponges loaded with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 9 induces greater osteoblast differentiation when compared to bone morphogenetic protein 2.

Authors:  Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Benoit Schaller; Nikola Saulacic; Benjamin E Pippenger; Yufeng Zhang; Richard J Miron
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2017-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.