PURPOSE: The integrin αvβ3 is differentially expressed on neovascular endothelial cells. We investigated whether a novel intravenously injectable αvβ3 integrin-ligand coupled nanoparticle (NP) can target choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV) for imaging and targeted gene therapy. METHODS: CNV lesions were induced in rats using laser photocoagulation. The utility of NP for in vivo imaging and gene delivery was evaluated by coupling the NP with a green fluorescing protein plasmid (NP-GFPg). Rhodamine labeling (Rd-NP) was used to localize NP in choroidal flatmounts. Rd-NP-GFPg particles were injected intravenously on weeks 1, 2, or 3. In the treatment arm, rats received NP containing a dominant negative Raf mutant gene (NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5. The change in CNV size and leakage, and TUNEL positive cells were quantified. RESULTS: GFP plasmid expression was seen in vivo up to 3 days after injection of Rd-NP-GFPg. Choroidal flatmounts confirmed the localization of the NP and the expression of GFP plasmid in the CNV. Treating the CNV with NP-ATPμ-Raf decreased the CNV size by 42% (P<0.001). OCT analysis revealed that the reduction of CNV size started on day 5 and reached statistical significance by day 7. Fluorescein angiography grading showed significantly less leakage in the treated CNV (P<0.001). There were significantly more apoptotic (TUNEL-positive) nuclei in the treated CNV. CONCLUSION: Systemic administration of αvβ3 targeted NP can be used to label the abnormal blood vessels of CNV for imaging. Targeted gene delivery with NP-ATPμ-Raf leads to a reduction in size and leakage of the CNV by induction of apoptosis in the CNV.
PURPOSE: The integrin αvβ3 is differentially expressed on neovascular endothelial cells. We investigated whether a novel intravenously injectable αvβ3 integrin-ligand coupled nanoparticle (NP) can target choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV) for imaging and targeted gene therapy. METHODS: CNV lesions were induced in rats using laser photocoagulation. The utility of NP for in vivo imaging and gene delivery was evaluated by coupling the NP with a green fluorescing protein plasmid (NP-GFPg). Rhodamine labeling (Rd-NP) was used to localize NP in choroidal flatmounts. Rd-NP-GFPg particles were injected intravenously on weeks 1, 2, or 3. In the treatment arm, rats received NP containing a dominant negative Raf mutant gene (NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5. The change in CNV size and leakage, and TUNEL positive cells were quantified. RESULTS: GFP plasmid expression was seen in vivo up to 3 days after injection of Rd-NP-GFPg. Choroidal flatmounts confirmed the localization of the NP and the expression of GFP plasmid in the CNV. Treating the CNV with NP-ATPμ-Raf decreased the CNV size by 42% (P<0.001). OCT analysis revealed that the reduction of CNV size started on day 5 and reached statistical significance by day 7. Fluorescein angiography grading showed significantly less leakage in the treated CNV (P<0.001). There were significantly more apoptotic (TUNEL-positive) nuclei in the treated CNV. CONCLUSION: Systemic administration of αvβ3 targeted NP can be used to label the abnormal blood vessels of CNV for imaging. Targeted gene delivery with NP-ATPμ-Raf leads to a reduction in size and leakage of the CNV by induction of apoptosis in the CNV.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in developed
countries for people over the age of 50 [1]–[3]. The neovascular or
“wet” form of the disease, characterized by the development of choroidal
neovascular membranes (CNV) is the main cause of visual impairment in macular
degeneration [3]–[5]. With the advent of new treatment options such as
photodynamic therapy, and especially intravitreal antiangiogenic pharmacotherapy,
the visual prognosis of patients with CNV has improved significantly [6]–[9]. However, the
current standard-of-care therapies require monthly intravitreal injections by a
retina specialist due to their short half-life in the vitreous [10], [11]. Aside from the logistic
difficulties and the patients' discomfort, it also puts the patient at risk for
cataract formation, endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment.
Thus, there is a great need for alternative means of delivering antineovascular
therapy to the retina.Recently, there has been substantial progress in the development of nanoparticles
with an integrin-targeted delivery system [12]–[15]. During vascular remodeling
and angiogenesis, several integrins are expressed on the endothelial cells to
potentiate cell invasion and proliferation [16], [17]. Among them, integrin
αvβ3 is expressed on many cell types but its expression level in normal
tissue is generally low [18], [19]. It is preferentially expressed on angiogenic blood
vessels, mediating survival signal and facilitating vascular cell proliferation
[20], [21]. Previous
reports show that integrin αvβ3 is involved in ocular angiogenesis [22], [23].
In vivo experiments have shown antibodies blocking or
immunoconjugate drug therapy targeting integrin αvβ3 inhibit
neovascularizaion [17], [23]–[26]. In addition, integrin αvβ3 potentiates the
internalization of various viruses [27], [28], making it a potential target
for drug delivery via liposome based nanoparticles.Previously we have shown that systemic injection of a cationic nanoparticle coupled
to an integrin αvβ3-targeting ligand (NP) can deliver a suicide gene to the
tumor neovasculature in rats, causing apoptosis and significant tumor regression
[12]. Here we
evaluated and were able to demonstrate that NP can target choroidal neovascular
membranes (CNV) in rats for imaging and targeted gene therapy using a plasmid DNA
encoding ATPμ-Raf, a dominant-negative mutant form of Raf kinase [29].
Materials and Methods
Animals and Ethics Statement
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the recommendations in the
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of
Health.and the guidelines established by the Animal Care Committee (ACC) of the
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. The protocol was approved by the ACC
(protocol number 07-10-012). A total of 106 Brown-Norway male rats weighing
175–225 grams were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington,
MA) and used for the experiments.
Characteristics and preparation of Nanoparticles
Detailed description of the NPs and their synthesis has been published previously
[12]. All
custom-made lipids and genes were GLP manufactured. Briefly, purified lipid
components were dissolved in organic solvents (CHCl3 and CH3OH in a ratio
1∶1). The CHCl3 and CH3OH were evaporated and dried
in rotavap for 24 hours. Distilled and deionized water was added to yield a
heterogeneous solution of 30 mM in total lipid concentration. The lipid/water
mixture was then sonicated with a probe-tip sonicator for at least one hour.
Throughout sonication, the pH of the solution was maintained between 7.0 and 7.5
with 0.01N NaOH solution, and the temperature was maintained above the
gel-liquid crystal phase transition point (Tm). The liposome solution was
transferred to a petri dish resting on a bed of wet ice, cooled to 0°C, and
irradiated at 254 nm for at least one hour with a hand-held UV lamp placed 1 cm
above the petri dish, yielding NPs. The NPs were then filtered through a 0.2
µm filter and collected.Using a Brookhaven dynamic light scattering system (DLS), the size (diameter),
distribution, and zeta potential of NPs were determined to be
45.3+2.4 nm and +35mv respectively, averaged for 17
cycles of NP synthesis.The rats received intravenous treatments at a dose 1 mg/kg of NP and 1
µg/kg of plasmid DNA containing the Raf mutant gene (ATPμ-Raf). Total
volume of injection was 350 µl.
Induction of Choroidal Neovascular Membranes
Animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 to 0.3 mL of a
1∶1 mixture of 100 mg/mL ketamine and 20 mg/mL xylazine. Pupils were
dilated with 5.0% phenylephrine and 0.8% tropicamide. CNV was
induced in the eyes of rats with a 532-nm laser (Oculight GLx; Iridex, Mountain
View, CA), as previously described [30]–[32]. Four to eight laser spots
(180 mW, 100 µm, 100 ms) were placed in each eye of the rat with a slit
lamp delivery system and a cover slip serving as a contact lens. If significant
hemorrhage occurred, the eye was excluded.
Evaluation of Specific Targeting of CNV Using In Vivo
Imaging and Choroidal Flatmounts
NP carrying a green fluorescing protein (GFP) plasmid (NP-GFPg) was used to
evaluate the ability of the particles to deliver a gene to the neovascular
endothelial cells. Rhodamine labeling of the NP (Rd-NP) was used to localize the
particles in choroidal flatmounts. Rats were divided into 3 groups of 6 animals
and evaluated 1, 2, or 3 weeks after creation of CNV. The formation of CNV was
confirmed by fluorescein angiography (FA) using a digital fundus camera
(TCR50IA; Topcon, Paramus, NJ) following intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 mL of
2% fluorescein sodium. The rats where then injected with Rd-NP-GFPg
particles. The expression of GFP was evaluated with in vivo
imaging using the same camera and FA filter settings 24, 48, and 72 hours after
injection of particles. The rats were then euthanized and choroidal flat mounts
were performed at the above time points. RPE-choroid-sclera complex was
flatmounted (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and coverslipped. Pictures of
the choroidal flatmounts were taken by a confocal microscope (Leica
Microsystems, Wetzler, Germany). Negative controls were evaluated under
identical conditions without injection of NP or following injection of
non-targeted rhodamine labeled liposome particles carrying GFP-plasmid.
Treatment of CNV with Targeted Gene Delivery
After creation of laser-induced CNV, animals were divided in to 7 groups; groups
A–C were treatment groups and groups D–G were controls. Group A
(n = 6 received one intravenous injection of
ανβ3 targeted-NP containing ATPμ-Raf
(NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5 after CNV creation; group B
(n = 6) received one intravenous injection of
NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 3, 5, and 7; group C (n = 3)
received one intravenous injection of NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 7, 9, and 11;
group D (n = 6) did not receive any treatment; group E
(n = 3) received one intravenous injection of non-targeted
NP containing ATPμ-Raf (ntNP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5; group F
(n = 3) received one intravenous injection of
ανβ3 targeted-NP without ATPμ-Raf (NP)
on days 1,3, and 5; and group G (n = 3) received one
intravenous injection of ATPμ-Raf gene without NP on days 1, 3, and 5.
Evaluation of CNV Size and Leakage
We used FA and OCT to monitor CNV development and changes in
vivo and choroidal flatmounts to study the size of the lesions
ex vivo. FA was performed as detailed above, 1 and 2 weeks
after CNV creation in all treated and control animals. A choroidal neovascular
membrane was defined as fully regressed after treatment if there was no leakage
in the area of treated membrane [30], [31]. The angiograms were graded by two masked readers
using a pre-established grading scheme [33], [34]. Briefly, the description
of each grade follows: 0, faint hyperfluorescence or mottled fluorescence
without leakage; 1, hyperfluorescent lesion without progressive increase in size
or intensity; 2A, hyperfluorescence increasing in intensity but not in size; 2B,
hyperfluorescence increasing in intensity and in size.Two weeks after CNV creation, the size of the CNV lesions was measured in
choroidal flatmounts using the methods reported previously after perfusion of 5
mg/mL fluorescein labeled dextran [31], [35]. A computer program (OpenLab; Improvision, Boston,
MA) was used by two masked investigators to measure the hyperfluorescent areas
corresponding to the CNV lesions.
Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement of CNV Size
Six rats treated with intravenous NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 1,3 and 5 and 6 control
rats without treatment were used for evaluation of CNV size in
vivo using optical coherence tomography (SDOCT, Bioptigen, Durham,
NC) on days 3, 5, and 7 after CNV creation. A volume analysis was performed,
using 100 horizontal raster, consecutive B-scan lines, each one composed of 1200
A-scans. The volume size was 2.1×2.1 cm. To evaluate the cross-sectional
size of each lesion in OCT images, the sections passing through the center of
the CNV were chosen. The center of the lesion was defined as the midline passing
through the area of RPE-Bruch's membrane rupture. In order to consistently
identify this point, we used the en-face fundus reconstruction tool provided
with the Bioptigen SD-OCT system. For each time point, the same spot was used to
evaluate the size of the CNV. CNV was outlined from the inner border of the
retinal pigment epithelial layer to the top of the lesion and the size was
measured using Image J software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/,
last access January 7th 2009).
Histopathology of CNV Lesions
On day 3,5, 7 and 14 after CNV creation, eyes were enucleated and fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hour and
cryoprotected. Serial sections of the eyes were cut at 10 µm thickness on
a cryostat (CM1850; Leica, Heidelberger, Nussloch, Germany) at −20 C, and
prepared for staining. Terminal dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay was
performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (ApoTag Fluorescein in
situ Apoptosis Detection Kit; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) as previously reported
[31], [36]. CD31
(1∶100, Serotec, Oxford, UK) antibody was used for visualizing endothelial
cells and a mouse monoclonal antibody for ED1, the rat homologue of humanCD68
(1∶100, Millipore, Billerica, MA) was used for staining macrophages.
Sections were then stained with DAPI (1∶1000, Invitrogen Ltd, Carlsbad,
CA, USA) for nuclear staining and mounted with Vecta shield mounting media
(Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Photographs of the CNV were taken with
upright fluorescent microscope (DM RXA; Leica, Solms, Germany) and the number of
TUNEL positive and ED 1 positive cells were counted.
Statistical Analysis
All values are presented as mean ± SE. Paired groups were compared using
the Wilcoxon t-test. For three groups, data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test
and for two group comparisons, Mann-Whitney U test was used (SPSS statistics
17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
In Vivo imaging Reveals GFP-Plasmid Expression by
CNV
Formation of CNV was confirmed by FA prior to injection of NP. One day after
injection of rhodamine-labeled αvβ3 targeted nanoparticle carrying a GFP
plasmid (Rd-NP-GFPg), digital fundus photography with FA filter settings
revealed hyperfluorescence of the CNV lesions, confirming localization and
adhesion of the NP and GFP expression. This hyperfluorescence was sustained
through day 3 (data not shown) and was seen in 1, 2, and 3-week-old CNV lesions
examined (Figure
1A–C). There was no notable hyperfluorescence noted above
background fluorescence level in the control groups (Figure 1D–F). There was no evidence of
increased fluorescence in the normal retinal or choroidal vasculature.
Figure 1
Bioimaging with NP-angiography showing GFP expression using the
Topcon camera with fluorescein angiography filter settings.
Late phase FAs (A and D) show the CNV lesions prior to injection of NP.
Autofluorescent images taken prior to injection of NP reveal minimal
background fluorescence of the CNV lesions (B and E). Injection of
targeted NP carrying a GFP plasmid (NP-GFPg) causes increased
fluorescence of the CNV lesions from GFP expression (C) whereas
non-targeted NP carrying a GFP plasmid (ntNP-GFPg) does not cause any
increase in the intensity of fluorescence of the CNV over background
autofluorescence (F).
Bioimaging with NP-angiography showing GFP expression using the
Topcon camera with fluorescein angiography filter settings.
Late phase FAs (A and D) show the CNV lesions prior to injection of NP.
Autofluorescent images taken prior to injection of NP reveal minimal
background fluorescence of the CNV lesions (B and E). Injection of
targeted NP carrying a GFP plasmid (NP-GFPg) causes increased
fluorescence of the CNV lesions from GFP expression (C) whereas
non-targeted NP carrying a GFP plasmid (ntNP-GFPg) does not cause any
increase in the intensity of fluorescence of the CNV over background
autofluorescence (F).
Rhodamine-Labeled αvβ3 Targeted Nanoparticle Accumulate in the CNV
and Induce GFP Expression
The delivery of rhodamine dye and the expression of GFP plasmid in the CNV were
confirmed by performing confocal microscopy on choroidal flat mounts (Figure 2). Choroidal
flatmounts performed after in vivo imaging revealed
accumulation of rhodamine labeled nanoparticles in the CNV lesion (Figure 2C). There was an
overlap of GFP expression and the rhodamine accumulation in the CNV (Figure 2D). No notable
difference was seen in the pattern of NP accumulation or intensity of GFP
expression over the time course examined. There was no evidence of increased
fluorescence in the normal choroidal vasculature and no evidence of rhodamine
accumulation or GFP expression in the control animal injected with non-targeted
rhodamine labeled nanoparticles carrying a GFP plasmid (Rd-ntNP-GFPg; Figure 2E–H).
Figure 2
Choroidal flatmounts showing accumulation of rhodamine labeled NP and
expression of GFP plasmid in the CNV.
The CNV lesions are delineated by arrowheads in bright field images with
false blue color (A and E). FITC-filtered images highlight the GFP
expression one day after systemic injection of Rd-NP-GFPg (B) whereas
non-targeted NP (Rd-ntNP-GFPg) does not induce GFP expression in CNV
(F). Cy3-filtered images highlight that rhodamine-labeled NP
(Rd-NP-GFPg) accumulates in the CNV (C), while rhodamine-labeled
non-targeted NP (Rd-ntNP-GFPg) does not (G). Some particles can be
visualized circulating in the choroidal vessels. Overlay of images
A–C is presented in panel D and overlay of E–G is shown in
H.
Choroidal flatmounts showing accumulation of rhodamine labeled NP and
expression of GFP plasmid in the CNV.
The CNV lesions are delineated by arrowheads in bright field images with
false blue color (A and E). FITC-filtered images highlight the GFP
expression one day after systemic injection of Rd-NP-GFPg (B) whereas
non-targeted NP (Rd-ntNP-GFPg) does not induce GFP expression in CNV
(F). Cy3-filtered images highlight that rhodamine-labeled NP
(Rd-NP-GFPg) accumulates in the CNV (C), while rhodamine-labeled
non-targeted NP (Rd-ntNP-GFPg) does not (G). Some particles can be
visualized circulating in the choroidal vessels. Overlay of images
A–C is presented in panel D and overlay of E–G is shown in
H.
ανβ3 Targeted-NP Containing ATPμ-Raf Reduces the Size of
CNV
Treatment of CNV with intravenous injection of ανβ3 targeted-NP
containing ATPμ-Raf (NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5 resulted in a
42.0% reduction in the CNV size on choroidal flatmount compared with
control CNVs with no treatment (mean size, 53538.7 µm2 vs.
31029.3 µm2, p<0.001) (Figure 3A and E). Treatment with 3 doses of
NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 3, 5 and 7 also showed a 24.6% decrease in the
CNV size (Figure 3F).
Treatment on days 7, 9, and 11 did not lead to a significant reduction of CNV
size (data not shown). Three additional control groups
(n = 3 each) were given intravenous injection of
non-targeted-NP containing ATPμ-Raf (ntNP- ATPμ-Raf), naked
ATPμ-Raf, and ανβ3 targeted-NP with no ATPμ-Raf (NP) on days
1,3, and 5 after CNV formation. There was no difference in the CNV size between
any of the 4 control groups, including the no treatment group (Kruskal- Wallis
test, p = 0.168) (Figure 3A–D).
Figure 3
Late phase fluorescein angiography (FA) and choroidal flatmounts
(x10) two weeks after laser
photocoagulation.
Representative lesions are from the control group (A–D) and the
NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group (E and F). Group (A) received no
treatment; (B) received intravenous injection of non-targeted NP
containing ATPμ-Raf on days 1, 3, and 5 after laser CNV creation;
(C) received intravenous injection of
ανβ3 targeted-NP without
ATPμ-Raf gene on days 1,3, and 5; (D) received injection of
ATPμ-Raf gene without NP on days 1, 3, and 5; (E) received injection
of ανβ3 targeted-NP containing
ATPμ-Raf (NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5; and (F) received
injection of NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 3, 5, and 7. NP-ATPμ-Raf
treated groups (E and F) had significantly lower grade CNV lesions on FA
grading and smaller CNV size compared to the control group (A–D).
No statistically significant difference in size was noted between the
control groups A–D. Quantification of the CNV size on choroidal
flat mounts is shown in (G). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the
mean ± SE.
Late phase fluorescein angiography (FA) and choroidal flatmounts
(x10) two weeks after laser
photocoagulation.
Representative lesions are from the control group (A–D) and the
NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group (E and F). Group (A) received no
treatment; (B) received intravenous injection of non-targeted NP
containing ATPμ-Raf on days 1, 3, and 5 after laser CNV creation;
(C) received intravenous injection of
ανβ3 targeted-NP without
ATPμ-Raf gene on days 1,3, and 5; (D) received injection of
ATPμ-Raf gene without NP on days 1, 3, and 5; (E) received injection
of ανβ3 targeted-NP containing
ATPμ-Raf (NP-ATPμ-Raf) on days 1, 3, and 5; and (F) received
injection of NP-ATPμ-Raf on days 3, 5, and 7. NP-ATPμ-Raf
treated groups (E and F) had significantly lower grade CNV lesions on FA
grading and smaller CNV size compared to the control group (A–D).
No statistically significant difference in size was noted between the
control groups A–D. Quantification of the CNV size on choroidal
flat mounts is shown in (G). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the
mean ± SE.To track the reduction of CNV size in vivo after treatment with
NP-ATPμ-Raf, we used OCT imaging. We were able to delineate the CNV as a
discrete subretinal hyperreflective material starting on day 5 (Figure 4B and C). While the
difference in the cross-sectional CNV size on day 5 between treated and control
CNV had not reached statistical significance, (Mann- Whitney U test,
p = 0.066), significantly decreased size was noted on day 7
in the treated group compared to the control group (Mann- Whitney U test,
p = 0.001) (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
In vivo evaluation of CNV utilizing SD-OCT.
Quantification of CNV size using SD-OCT (A) reveals a decrease in CNV
size, reaching statistical significance on day 7 (Mann- Whitney U test,
p = 0.001) in the NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group
compared to the control group. A hyper-reflective subretinal lesion is
seen as delineated by the red dotted line (B). This lesion corresponds
to the hyporeflective area on fundus reconstruction (red dotted circle,
C). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE.
In vivo evaluation of CNV utilizing SD-OCT.
Quantification of CNV size using SD-OCT (A) reveals a decrease in CNV
size, reaching statistical significance on day 7 (Mann- Whitney U test,
p = 0.001) in the NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group
compared to the control group. A hyper-reflective subretinal lesion is
seen as delineated by the red dotted line (B). This lesion corresponds
to the hyporeflective area on fundus reconstruction (red dotted circle,
C). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE.
Treatment with NP-ATPμ-Raf Leads to a Reduction in Size and Leakage of
CNV on FA
Quantitative assessment of CNV leakage by FA performed on day 14 was carried out
by two masked graders. Pathologic leakage from the CNV could be noted in the
late phase (6–8 minutes) in the untreated group with large and diffuse
area of leakage (Figure
3A–D). The treated group showed less leakage with smaller
lesions (Figure 3E and F).
FA grading revealed that 70%∼83.8% of the CNV in the different
control groups showed grade 2B leakage, while 40.3% of the CNV in the
treated group had grade 2B leakage (Table 1; Pearson Chi- square test,
p<0.001). There was no difference in the distribution of grading amongst the
4 different control groups (Pearson Chi- square test,
p = 0.679). Also, no statistically significant difference
was found in the distribution of leakage grading between the groups treated on
days 1, 3, and 5 or days 3, 5, and 7 (Pearson Chi- square test,
p = 0.152).
Table 1
Fluorescein angiography (FA) grading of CNV lesions.
Grade 1
Grade 2A
Grade 2B
Total
Control
5(6.2%)
16(19.8%)
60(74.1%)
81
ntNP-ATPμ-Raf
2(5%)
10(25%)
28(70%)
40
ATPμ-Raf
3(7.1%)
7(16.7%)
32(76.2%)
42
NP
0(0%)
6(16.2%)
31(83.8%)
37
NP-ATPμ-Raf on D1, 3, 5
10(13.9%)
33(45.8%)
59(40.3%)
72
NP-ATPμ-Raf on D3, 5, 7
1(2.8%)
16(44.4%)
19(52.8%)
36
Significantly higher percentage of control CNV lesions were Grade 2B
compared to the treated CNV (Pearson Chi-square test P<0.001).
There were no significant differences between the different
treatment groups (Pearson Chi-square test
P = 0.679).
Significantly higher percentage of control CNV lesions were Grade 2B
compared to the treated CNV (Pearson Chi-square test P<0.001).
There were no significant differences between the different
treatment groups (Pearson Chi-square test
P = 0.679).
Reduced Endothelial Cell Count and Increased Apoptosis in CNV Treated with
NP-ATPμ-Raf
CD31-positive endothelial cells were detected in the subretinal space starting on
day 3 after laser injury (figure
5D). The cells increased and focalized to a distinct subretinal
membrane representing the CNV by day 7. In the treated CNV, there were fewer CD
31-postive cells and the CNV appeared more compact with distinct borders and
fibrous formation by day 7 (Figure
5D).
Figure 5
Evaluation of endothelial cell apoptosis with TUNEL staining in
frozen sections.
Quantification of TUNEL positive cells showed significantly more
TUNEL(+) cells/lesion (A) and TUNEL (+) cells/mm2
(B) with treatment of NP-ATPμ-Raf compared to the control group on
day 3 and 5 after laser injury. There was a statistically significant
reduction of CNV size noted on day 7(C). Double-immunofluorescent
staining of frozen sections (x20) obtained at 3, 5 and
7 days after laser photocoagulation for the endothelial cell marker CD31
and TUNEL stain (D). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean
± SE.
Evaluation of endothelial cell apoptosis with TUNEL staining in
frozen sections.
Quantification of TUNEL positive cells showed significantly more
TUNEL(+) cells/lesion (A) and TUNEL (+) cells/mm2
(B) with treatment of NP-ATPμ-Raf compared to the control group on
day 3 and 5 after laser injury. There was a statistically significant
reduction of CNV size noted on day 7(C). Double-immunofluorescent
staining of frozen sections (x20) obtained at 3, 5 and
7 days after laser photocoagulation for the endothelial cell marker CD31
and TUNEL stain (D). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean
± SE.We investigated signs of apoptosis with TUNEL staining. In the treated group,
significantly more TUNEL-positive nuclei were observed in the CNV starting on
day 3 (Figure 5A and B).
This trend continued through day 7 (Mann Whitney U test, p<0.01 for day 3 and
5, p = 0.01 for day 7, Figure 6B). The reduction of the CNV size as
measured in histological sections reached statistical significance on day 7
(Mann Whitney U test, P = 0.001, Figure 6C).
Figure 6
Increased macrophage infiltration at the site of treated CNV.
Macrophage infiltration was highest on day 3 with gradual decrease on
days 5 and 7. Significantly higher number of macrophages were observed
with the NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group compared to the control group on
days 5 and 7 (A and B). There was a statistically significant reduction
of CNV size noted on day 7(C). Immunofluorescent staining of
representative frozen sections (x20) obtained at 3, 5,
and 7 days after laser photocoagulation for ED 1, a marker for
macrophage (D). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ±
SE.
Increased macrophage infiltration at the site of treated CNV.
Macrophage infiltration was highest on day 3 with gradual decrease on
days 5 and 7. Significantly higher number of macrophages were observed
with the NP-ATPμ-Raf treated group compared to the control group on
days 5 and 7 (A and B). There was a statistically significant reduction
of CNV size noted on day 7(C). Immunofluorescent staining of
representative frozen sections (x20) obtained at 3, 5,
and 7 days after laser photocoagulation for ED 1, a marker for
macrophage (D). *P<0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ±
SE.
Macrophage infiltration with ανβ3 Targeted-NP Containing
ATPμ-Raf
ED 1 positive cells (a marker for macrophages, equivalent to humanCD 68) were
concentrated within the subretinal space at the laser injury site on day 3
(Figure 6D). No ED
1-positive cells were observed in the undamaged choroid. No difference was noted
in the number of ED 1-positive cells infiltrated into the CNV between the
treated group and the untreated group on day 3. However, on day 5 and 7
statistically more ED 1-positive cells were seen in the treatment group (Mann
Whitney U test, P<0.01 respectively; Figure 6D).
Discussion
Specific targeting and delivery of medication for the treatment of CNV remains
challenging [37].
In this study we were able to target experimental CNV after systemic injection of a
cationic nanoparticle coupled to an integrin αvβ3-targeting ligand (NP) and
utilize this method for imaging and treatment of CNV in rats.We first demonstrated the vascular targeting of NP and it's ability to deliver a
gene to the neovascular endothelial cells of CNV in rats using rhodamine labeled NPs
coupled with GFP (Rd-NP-GFPg). GFP expression was seen in vivo
using fundus NP-angiography with FA filter settings and ex vivo in
choroidal flat mounts. In vivo imaging revealed increased
fluorescence, sustained for 3 days after NP injection, in 1, 2, or 3 week old CNV
(figure 1). GFP expression
co-localized to the area of rhodamine labeled NP accumulation in the CNV on
choroidal flat mounts indicating GFP expression is correlated with areas of NP
adhesion to neovascular endothelial cells of CNV (figure 2). None of the retinal or choroidal
vasculature showed increased fluorescence from GFP expression. The specific
targeting of NP is due to the selectivity of its binding ligand for integrin
αvβ3 [12],
which has limited cellular distribution in normal tissue including the eye [23], [38]. This integrin
is significantly up regulated during the process of vascular remodeling and
angiogenesis and is present in pathologic specimens from human eyes with CNV or
proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) [17], [22], [23], [39], [40]. With the specific labeling of
CNV demonstrated here, fundus NP-angiography utilizing various dyes has the
potential to be a novel imaging technique for detecting new CNV or to follow CNV
activity independent of CNV size and leakage. Recently, Takeda and colleagues have
shown early detection of experimental CNV, not visible on FA, using a similar
technique with anti-CCR3 antibody fragments [41]. The advantage of using NPs
over immunoconjugate dyes in bioimaging and targeted therapy is that they are less
likely to incite an immune reaction.In the treatment arm of the study, we were able to demonstrate significant reduction
of CNV size and leakage by targeted gene therapy using NP coupled to ATPμ-Raf, a
dominant negative form of Raf kinase (Figure 3, 4).
Previously Singh et al treated experimental CNV using
poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) nanoparticles carrying a VEGF inhibitory gene [42]. Our approach is
different in a number of ways including the type of particles used, specificity of
targeting, and the gene delivered. The particles that Singh et al
used had a negative z-potential as expected for PLGA nanoparticles, our therapy has
a neutral charge and therefore is not toxic in tissue-cultured cells. Our
nanoparticles are smaller (45.3 nm vs. 270–420 nm) and form a stable shell
through covalent bonds that are far more stable in blood circulation than polymer
based (used by Sing et al and hydrolyzed in aqueous environment) or
liposome based delivery systems. This stability may lead to more efficacy and/or
more side effects. A separate toxicity study is planned to answer this question. The
targeted gene, Raf kinase, is an integral member of an intracellular signal
transduction pathway involved in regulation of the cell cycle. ATPμ-Raf is a
mutant form of Raf-l that fails to bind ATP and blocks the endothelial cell Raf
activity in vitro
[12], [29]. Raf-1
mutation has been linked to vascular defect and apoptosis during embryogenesis and
gene therapy with ATPμ-Raf causes endothelial cell apoptosis and tumor
regression in rats [12], [43]. Our results indicate a similar mechanism of CNV
regression, through induction of apoptosis in neovascular endothelial cells, after
targeted gene therapy with NP-ATPμ-Raf. There were significantly higher number
of TUNEL positive cells in the treated CNV as compared to the controls (Figure 5). Moreover, while the
recruitment of macrophages per lesion decreased with time in both groups, more
macrophage infiltration was noted on days 5 and 7 in the treatment group (Figure 6). The initial spike in
macrophage infiltration is likely the result of the inflammatory response to the
laser injury. The increased macrophage recruitment to the treated CNV closely
follows the increased apoptotic activity, suggesting that the macrophages may be
responding to cell death by apoptosis or necroptosis.Repeated systemic administration of NP for the treatment of CNV may lead to side
effects such as blood clots in the elderly patient population. However, Intravenous
(I.V.) administration of our treatment is not repetitious as apposed to the
intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF therapies for example. In addition, for some
patients, I.V. injections are less invasive than intravitreal injections and do not
carry the potential ocular complications. Furthermore, due to the specificity of the
binding site, the dose of nanoparticles needed is small and the tissue distribution
limited, making systemic side effects less likely. In our study, we did not attempt
the intreavitreal route of delivery as part of the investigation. Due to the large
size of the NP (45.3 nm), it is unclear if it can distribute through the vitreous
and cross the retina to reach the lumen of the CNV vessels through phagocytosis,
pinocytosis or other mechanisms.We also explored the timing of imaging and treatment with targeted NP in our study.
Although we were able to target CNV with NP and capture GFP expression by
NP-angiography up to three weeks after CNV induction, the maximum efficacy of
treatment was achieved when treatment was given on days 1,3 and 5 (42%
reduction in CNV size). We saw a modest decrease in the CNV size (24.6%) when
the treatment was given on days 3, 5 and 7 and found no effect with treatment on
days 7, 9 and 11. This data is consistent with the timing of integrin αvβ3
expression in the laser induced CNV in rats [44]. Integrin αvβ3 is
expressed up to 4 weeks after laser injury, however its expression levels are
significantly higher in the early stages of CNV formation, peaking at day 7 [44]. The fact that we
were unable to show CNV regression with treatment starting at later time points may
be due to the concentrations of NP used or the efficacy of transfecting the CNV
endothelial cells with ATPμ-Raf. Integrin αvβ3 expression has been shown
in pathologic specimens from humanCNV and diabetic retinopathy [23], [45], however, the
timing and duration of expression of this integrin has not been studied.In summary, our results provide evidence that systemic administration of αvβ3
targeted NP can be used to label the abnormal blood vessels of CNV for imaging and
targeted gene therapy with ATPμ-Raf. These results provide a proof-of-concept
for this emerging technology and encourage further experimentation to discern the
integration of NPs into current imaging and treatment of CNV and retinal
neovascularization. Large animal studies and experiments utilizing NP coupled to
various dyes and chemotherapeutic or anti-neovascular compounds need to be pursued
to further explore the efficacy of this diagnostic and treatment strategy.
Authors: C C Kumar; L Armstrong; Z Yin; M Malkowski; E Maxwell; H Ling; B Yaremko; M Liu; J Varner; E M Smith; B Neustadt; T Nechuta Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Hadi J Zambarakji; Toru Nakazawa; Edward Connolly; Anne Marie Lane; Sreedevi Mallemadugula; Michael Kaplan; Norman Michaud; Ali Hafezi-Moghadam; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Joan W Miller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Keven J Blinder; Shannon Bradley; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Guy Donati; Yong Hao; Colin Ma; Ugo Menchini; Joan Miller; Michael J Potter; Constantin Pournaras; Al Reaves; Philip J Rosenfeld; H Andrew Strong; Michael Stur; Xiang Yao Su; Gianni Virgili Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David N Zacks; Eric Ezra; Yoshiko Terada; Norman Michaud; Edward Connolly; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Joan W Miller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Eiji Sakurai; Hogara Taguchi; Akshay Anand; Balamurali K Ambati; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Joan W Miller; Anthony P Adamis; Jayakrishna Ambati Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: John D Hood; Mark Bednarski; Ricardo Frausto; Samira Guccione; Ralph A Reisfeld; Rong Xiang; David A Cheresh Journal: Science Date: 2002-06-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Klaus Pollinger; Robert Hennig; Andreas Ohlmann; Rudolf Fuchshofer; Rebecca Wenzel; Miriam Breunig; Joerg Tessmar; Ernst R Tamm; Achim Goepferich Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D Brivio; P Zygmanski; M Arnoldussen; J Hanlon; E Chell; E Sajo; G M Makrigiorgos; W Ngwa Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Wilfred Ngwa; Rajiv Kumar; Srinivas Sridhar; Houari Korideck; Piotr Zygmanski; Robert A Cormack; Ross Berbeco; G Mike Makrigiorgos Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.307