| Literature DB >> 21559142 |
July A Galeano Z, Patrick Sandoz, Emilie Gaiffe, Sophie Launay, Laurent Robert, Maxime Jacquot, Fabienne Hirchaud, Jean-Luc Prétet, Christiane Mougin.
Abstract
Position-referenced microscopy (PRM) is based on smart sample holders that integrate a position reference pattern (PRP) in their depth, allowing the determination of the lateral coordinates with respect to the sample-holder itself. Regions of interest can thus be retrieved easily after culture dish transfers from a cell incubator to the microscope stage. Images recorded at different instants in time are superimposed in a common coordinate system with subpixel accuracy. This paper presents such smart Petri culture dishes and their use for live cell culture monitoring. The impact of the PRP on the light budget is discussed and performances are demonstrated. First results on the application of PRM to the observation of apoptotic body internalization are reported.Entities:
Keywords: (100.0100) Image processing; (120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology; (120.5050) Phase measurement; (170.0180) Live cell culture; (180.2520) Fluorescence microscopy
Year: 2011 PMID: 21559142 PMCID: PMC3087587 DOI: 10.1364/BOE.2.001307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Opt Express ISSN: 2156-7085 Impact factor: 3.732
Fig. 1PRM principle. (a) Focusing on the biological material; (b) Biological image recorded (phase contrast plus confocal fluorescence, see Section 4.2); (c) Focusing on the PRP; (d) PRP image recorded (phase contrast).
Fig. 2Photograph of a position-referenced culture box; the patterned coverslip is stuck on the box aperture with bio-compatible polymer.
Fig. 3PRP impact on PSF: (a) converging wave after PRP crossing; (b) computed PSF in the focusing plane in logarithmic scale.
Percentage of Incident Light Power Concentrated in the Central Peak of the Diffraction Pattern in the Focus Plane Versus the Dot Material Transparency and the Proportion of Absent Dots
| 1/4 | 1/9 | 1/16 | 1/25 | none | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% (no dot) | 100% | ||||
| 95% | 98.1 | 97.7 | 97.6 | 97.6 | 97.5 |
| 75% | 90.8 | 89.2 | 88.3 | 87.8 | |
| 50% | 82.2 | 79.1 | 78.0 | 77.5 | 76.6 |
| 25% | 73.9 | 69.5 | 68.0 | 67.3 | 66.1 |
| 0% | 66.0 | 60.5 | 57.8 | 56.3 | |
| 0% - duty cycle: 0.4 | |||||
Fig. 4Deviation of reconstructed PRP positions from a straight line for a linear displacement of 500nm by the PZT. blue: PRP method; red: subpixel correlation method. Standard deviation between two curves: 2.5nm
Fig. 5Characterization of motorized microscope stage capabilities to retrieve a given position. (a) successive stage positions as reconstructed by PRP image processing. (b) same as (a) without reference position. (c) direct superimposition of reference image (red) with the second image (green). (d) same as (c) after image registration from PRP position.
Fig. 6Evolution of a fibroblast culture as observed by phase contrast microscopy. The chosen zone corresponds to a dust artefact around which cells are transforming. Sequence of images after digital registration by the PRM method. Image size: 120 × 120 pixels; 48 × 48 μm2; 60 × oil lens N.A.=1.42.
Fig. 7( Media 1) Video of a fibroblast cell as observed by fluorescence confocal microscopy and after image registration by PRM. Image size: 200 × 200 pixels; 120 × 120μm2; 20× dry N.A.=0.5.
Fig. 8( Media 2, Media 3) Video of the phagocytosis of an apoptotic body (green) by a fibroblast (red) as observed by fluorescence confocal microscopy and after image registration by PRM. Image size: 290 × 280 pixels; 116 × 112μm2; 60× oil N.A.=1.42.