Literature DB >> 21558927

Alteration of gingival exposure and its aesthetic effect.

Jun Guo1, Hani Gong, Weidong Tian, Wei Tang, Ding Bai.   

Abstract

This study analyzed the computerized variations of gingival exposure (GE) in unattractive smiles and evaluate the aesthetic effect to determine the acceptable range of GE for attractiveness. Images of the frontal posed smile of 50 juvenile women were evaluated in terms of attractiveness by doctors and laypersons separately to select the most unaesthetic one. And the most unaesthetic smile was modified with Photoshop in 2 ways-lowering upper lip and lifting lower lip-and the same evaluators were asked to reevaluate the changed images. We found that the smile with the most significant GE was selected as the most unaesthetic one. The attractiveness ratings were significantly lower in the doctors' group than in the laypersons' group (P < 0.05). The acceptable range of GE in the doctors' group was 0.54 to 2.23 mm, and in the laypersons' group, it was 0.09 to 2.35 mm. Among the many contributors to an attractive smile, GE alteration is the principal one, but not the only, and although 0- to 2.3-mm GE is just an acceptable range; there is an attractive GE degree or point for every individual. Gingival exposure alteration must be balanced against the others in clinical treatment, especially in maxillofacial surgery for the gummy smile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558927     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820f7f7a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Effects of different doses of abobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of anterior gingival smile.

Authors:  Doris Hexsel; Taciana Dal'Forno; Fernanda Camozzato; Indira Valente; Mariana Soirefmann; Aline Flor Silva; Carolina Siega
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Three-dimensional surgical guide approach to correcting skeletal Class II malocclusion with idiopathic condylar resorption.

Authors:  Hongzhe Wang; Chaoran Xue; En Luo; Wenyu Dai; Rui Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness.

Authors:  Pedro Lima Emmerich Oliveira; Andrea Fonseca Jardim da Motta; Clarice Julia Guerra; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

4.  Buccal Corridors: A Fact or a Myth in the Eyes of Laymen?

Authors:  Omnia A Elhiny; Asmaa Y Harhash
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Effect of posterior gingival smile on the perception of smile esthetics.

Authors:  Alicia Rodríguez-Martínez; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández; Luis-Alberto Bravo-González
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.