BACKGROUND: Time perception may be an important factor influencing distress of cancer patients. However, no comparative studies have been performed for cancer patients without evidence of disease and advanced cancer patients in the palliative, end-of-life-care setting. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were to assess time perception in disease-free and advanced cancer patients and examine the relation of time perception with patients' distress. METHODS: A descriptive research design was used. Ninety-six disease-free and 63 advanced cancer patients filled out Cottle's Circle Test to assess time coherence and time dominance, Cottle's Line Test to assess temporal extension and Bayes' question on speed of time, the European Organisation for Research-and-Treatment of Cancer QOL-Questionnaire version 2.0, Beck's Depression Inventory for primary care, and Beck's Hopelessness-Scale. RESULTS: In patients without evidence of disease, future dominance was most often observed, whereas in advanced cancer patients, the present was the dominant time segment. In both groups, a focus on the past was associated with distress. In contrast with patients without evidence of disease, advanced cancer patients perceived time as moving slowly, and this was correlated with distress. CONCLUSIONS: The time perception of cancer patients without evidence of disease and advanced cancer patients is significantly different and is related to distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The observed relation between a focus on the past and distress gives room for interventions of nurses and other healthcare professionals. Specific attention is needed for differences between cancer patients without evidence of disease and advanced cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Time perception may be an important factor influencing distress of cancerpatients. However, no comparative studies have been performed for cancerpatients without evidence of disease and advanced cancerpatients in the palliative, end-of-life-care setting. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were to assess time perception in disease-free and advanced cancerpatients and examine the relation of time perception with patients' distress. METHODS: A descriptive research design was used. Ninety-six disease-free and 63 advanced cancerpatients filled out Cottle's Circle Test to assess time coherence and time dominance, Cottle's Line Test to assess temporal extension and Bayes' question on speed of time, the European Organisation for Research-and-Treatment of Cancer QOL-Questionnaire version 2.0, Beck's Depression Inventory for primary care, and Beck's Hopelessness-Scale. RESULTS: In patients without evidence of disease, future dominance was most often observed, whereas in advanced cancerpatients, the present was the dominant time segment. In both groups, a focus on the past was associated with distress. In contrast with patients without evidence of disease, advanced cancerpatients perceived time as moving slowly, and this was correlated with distress. CONCLUSIONS: The time perception of cancerpatients without evidence of disease and advanced cancerpatients is significantly different and is related to distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The observed relation between a focus on the past and distress gives room for interventions of nurses and other healthcare professionals. Specific attention is needed for differences between cancerpatients without evidence of disease and advanced cancerpatients.
Authors: Katsiaryna Laryionava; Anton Schönstein; Pia Heußner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Eva C Winkler; Hans-Werner Wahl Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2021-12-30