Literature DB >> 21558591

Analytical positron range modelling in heterogeneous media for PET Monte Carlo simulation.

Wencke Lehnert1, Marie-Claude Gregoire, Anthonin Reilhac, Steven R Meikle.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation codes that model positron interactions along their tortuous path are expected to be accurate but are usually slow. A simpler and potentially faster approach is to model positron range from analytical annihilation density distributions. The aims of this paper were to efficiently implement and validate such a method, with the addition of medium heterogeneity representing a further challenge. The analytical positron range model was evaluated by comparing annihilation density distributions with those produced by the Monte Carlo simulator GATE and by quantitatively analysing the final reconstructed images of Monte Carlo simulated data. In addition, the influence of positronium formation on positron range and hence on the performance of Monte Carlo simulation was investigated. The results demonstrate that 1D annihilation density distributions for different isotope-media combinations can be fitted with Gaussian functions and hence be described by simple look-up-tables of fitting coefficients. Together with the method developed for simulating positron range in heterogeneous media, this allows for efficient modelling of positron range in Monte Carlo simulation. The level of agreement of the analytical model with GATE depends somewhat on the simulated scanner and the particular research task, but appears to be suitable for lower energy positron emitters, such as (18)F or (11)C. No reliable conclusion about the influence of positronium formation on positron range and simulation accuracy could be drawn.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558591     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/11/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  The importance of correction for tissue fraction effects in lung PET: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Tryphon Lambrou; Ashley M Groves; Kjell Erlandsson; Nick Screaton; Raymondo Endozo; Thida Win; Joanna C Porter; Brian F Hutton
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Effects of magnetic fields of up to 9.4 T on resolution and contrast of PET images as measured with an MR-BrainPET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Hans Herzog; Christoph Weirich; Lutz Tellmann; Joachim Kaffanke; Liliana Caldeira; Elena Rota Kops; Syed M Qaim; Heinz H Coenen; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Singular value decomposition analysis of back projection operator of maximum likelihood expectation maximization PET image reconstruction.

Authors:  Vencel Somai; David Legrady; Gabor Tolnai
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Effect of the magnetic field on positron range using GATE for PET-MR.

Authors:  Afroditi Eleftheriou; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Ottavia Bertolli; Εfstathios Stiliaris
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.