BACKGROUND: Analysis of chromosomal aberrations or single-gene disorders from rare fetal cells circulating in the blood of pregnant women requires verification of the cells' genomic identity. We have developed a method enabling multiple analyses at the single-cell level that combines verification of the genomic identity of microchimeric cells with molecular genetic and cytogenetic diagnosis. METHODS: We used a model system of peripheral blood mononuclear cells spiked with a colon adenocarcinoma cell line and immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin in combination with DNA staining with the nuclear dye TO-PRO-3 in a preliminary study to define candidate microchimeric (tumor) cells in Cytospin preparations. After laser microdissection, we performed low-volume on-chip isothermal whole-genome amplification (iWGA) of single and pooled cells. RESULTS: DNA fingerprint analysis of iWGA aliquots permitted successful identification of all analyzed candidate microchimeric cell preparations (6 samples of pooled cells, 7 samples of single cells). Sequencing of 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms was successful at the single-cell level for 20 of 32 allelic loci. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) with iWGA products of single cells showed the gains and losses known to be present in the genomic DNA of the target cells. CONCLUSIONS: This method may be instrumental in cell-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Furthermore, the possibility to perform mCGH with amplified DNA from single cells offers a perspective for the analysis of nonmicrochimeric rare cells exhibiting genomic alterations, such as circulating tumor cells.
BACKGROUND: Analysis of chromosomal aberrations or single-gene disorders from rare fetal cells circulating in the blood of pregnant women requires verification of the cells' genomic identity. We have developed a method enabling multiple analyses at the single-cell level that combines verification of the genomic identity of microchimeric cells with molecular genetic and cytogenetic diagnosis. METHODS: We used a model system of peripheral blood mononuclear cells spiked with a colon adenocarcinoma cell line and immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin in combination with DNA staining with the nuclear dye TO-PRO-3 in a preliminary study to define candidate microchimeric (tumor) cells in Cytospin preparations. After laser microdissection, we performed low-volume on-chip isothermal whole-genome amplification (iWGA) of single and pooled cells. RESULTS: DNA fingerprint analysis of iWGA aliquots permitted successful identification of all analyzed candidate microchimeric cell preparations (6 samples of pooled cells, 7 samples of single cells). Sequencing of 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms was successful at the single-cell level for 20 of 32 allelic loci. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) with iWGA products of single cells showed the gains and losses known to be present in the genomic DNA of the target cells. CONCLUSIONS: This method may be instrumental in cell-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Furthermore, the possibility to perform mCGH with amplified DNA from single cells offers a perspective for the analysis of nonmicrochimeric rare cells exhibiting genomic alterations, such as circulating tumor cells.
Authors: Giovanna Vona; Christophe Béroud; Alexandra Benachi; Alice Quenette; Jean Paul Bonnefont; Serge Romana; Yves Dumez; Bernard Lacour; Patrizia Paterlini-Bréchot Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Simone Hennerbichler; Peter M Kroisel; Hannelore Zierler; Barbara Pertl; Reinhold Wintersteiger; Gottfried Dohr; Peter Sedlmayr Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: B M Ghadimi; D L Sackett; M J Difilippantonio; E Schröck; T Neumann; A Jauho; G Auer; T Ried Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Kanji Kawai; Carrie Viars; Karen Arden; David Tarin; Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Turid Knutsen; Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Danny Wangsa; Linda Barenboim-Stapleton; Jordi Camps; Nicole McNeil; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Rainer Gangnus; Sabine Langer; Elisabeth Breit; Klaus Pantel; Michael R Speicher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amin El-Heliebi; Thomas Kroneis; Karin Wagner; Katharina Meditz; Dagmar Kolb; Julia Feichtinger; Gerhard G Thallinger; Franz Quehenberger; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Beate Rinner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: D J E Peeters; B De Laere; G G Van den Eynden; S J Van Laere; F Rothé; M Ignatiadis; A M Sieuwerts; D Lambrechts; A Rutten; P A van Dam; P Pauwels; M Peeters; P B Vermeulen; L Y Dirix Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mariam Said; Clint Cappiello; Joseph M Devaney; Daniele Podini; Alana L Beres; Stanislav Vukmanovic; Khodayar Rais-Bahrami; Naomi C Luban; Anthony D Sandler; Zohreh Tatari-Calderone Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 4.379