Literature DB >> 21558395

Biomarkers for cetuximab-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Peter P Grimminger1, Peter Danenberg, Kathrin Dellas, Dirk Arnold, Claus Rödel, Jean-Pascal Machiels, Karin Haustermans, Annelies Debucquoy, Vaneja Velenik, Christine Sempoux, Matej Bracko, Arnulf H Hölscher, Robert Semrau, Dongyun Yang, Kathleen Danenberg, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Daniel Vallböhmer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Phase II trials in locally advanced rectal cancer have shown that cetuximab-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is feasible but without an improvement in complete pathologic response rates. Our goal was to identify patients who would benefit from cetuximab-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation measuring gene expression levels of proteins involved in tumor growth [endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)], angiogenesis [VEGF, VEGF receptors 1 and 2 (VEGFR1, VEGFR2)], DNA repair [excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1)], and drug metabolism [thymidylate synthetase (TS)]. We also determined mutation status of KRAS and BRAF. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: This study was carried out on 130 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were enrolled in 4 different phase II clinical trials, using cetuximab-based chemoradiation. Tumor tissues were obtained before neoadjuvant and at surgical therapy. After microdissection, intratumoral gene expression levels and KRAS/BRAF mutation status were analyzed.
RESULTS: A significant decrease of TS, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 gene expression was seen following neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.03). High pretreatment VEGF gene expression levels were associated with nonresponse (P = 0.070). KRAS mutations were found in 42% and mutant KRAS (KRAS mt) was significantly associated with pathologic nonresponse (P = 0.037). In patients with wild-type KRAS (KRAS wt), low EGFR was significantly associated with higher nonresponse and VEGF mRNA expressions were associated with complete pathologic response (P = 0.012; P = 0.06). KRAS transversion (KRAS tv) was associated with tumor regression: nonresponse was more common in patients with KRAS tv than with KRAS wt (P = 0.007). BRAF V600E mutations were not detected in any of the patients.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that pretreatment intratumoral EGFR and VEGF mRNA expression levels as well as KRAS mutation status are predictive markers of pathologic response to neoadjuvant cetuximab-based chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558395     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  18 in total

1.  [RTOG study 0324: Cetuximab in combination with chemoradiation in patients with stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer].

Authors:  C Nieder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Effect of neoadjuvant cetuximab, capecitabine, and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Pei-Long Sun; Bing Li; Qi-Fa Ye
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Mutational and clinical predictors of pathologic complete response in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Russo; David P Ryan; Darrell R Borger; Jennifer Y Wo; Jackie Szymonifka; Wen-Yih Liang; Eunice L Kwak; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jill N Allen; Andrew X Zhu; David L Berger; James C Cusack; Harvey J Mamon; Kevin M Haigis; Theodore S Hong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

5.  Phase I Trial of Trametinib with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Christina Wu; Terence M Williams; Evan Wuthrick; Ryan Robb; Amy Webb; Lai Wei; Wei Chen; Sameh Mikhail; Kristen K Ciombor; Dana B Cardin; Cynthia Timmers; Somashekar G Krishna; Mark Arnold; Alan Harzman; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Sameek Roychowdhury; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Germline and somatic genetic predictors of pathological response in neoadjuvant settings of rectal and esophageal cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L E Salnikova; D S Kolobkov
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 7.  National Cancer Institute (NCI) state of the science: Targeted radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J George; Aaron J Franke; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Prajnan Das; Arvind Dasari; Bassel F El-Rayes; Theodore S Hong; Timothy J Kinsella; Jerome C Landry; James J Lee; Arta M Monjazeb; Samuel A Jacobs; David Raben; Osama E Rahma; Terence M Williams; Christina Wu; C Norman Coleman; Bhadrasain Vikram; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Rossana Berardi; Elena Maccaroni; Azzurra Onofri; Francesca Morgese; Mariangela Torniai; Michela Tiberi; Consuelo Ferrini; Stefano Cascinu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Cetuximab in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer - term outcome of the XERT trial.

Authors:  Vaneja Velenik; Janja Ocvirk; Irena Oblak; Franc Anderluh
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Tumor phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling and development of metastatic disease in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hansen Ree; Annette Torgunrud Kristensen; Marie Grøn Saelen; Rik de Wijn; Hege Edvardsen; Jovana Jovanovic; Torveig Weum Abrahamsen; Svein Dueland; Kjersti Flatmark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.