Literature DB >> 21558260

Quantitative genetic variation in static allometry in the threespine stickleback.

Katrina McGuigan1, Nicole Nishimura, Mark Currey, Dan Hurwit, William A Cresko.   

Abstract

The common pattern of replicated evolution of a consistent shape-environment relationship might reflect selection acting in similar ways within each environment, but divergently among environments. However, phenotypic evolution depends on the availability of additive genetic variation as well as on the direction of selection, implicating a bias in the distribution of genetic variance as a potential contributor to replicated evolution. Allometry, the relationship between shape and size, is a potential source of genetic bias that is poorly understood. The threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, provides an ideal system for exploring the contribution of genetic variance in body shape allometry to evolutionary patterns. The stickleback system comprises marine populations that exhibit limited phenotypic variation, and young freshwater populations which, following independent colonization events, have often evolved similar phenotypes in similar environments. In particular, stickleback diversification has involved changes in both total body size and relative size of body regions (i.e., shape). In a laboratory-reared cohort derived from an oceanic Alaskan population that is phenotypically and genetically representative of the ancestor of the diverse freshwater populations in this region, we determined the phenotypic static allometry, and estimated the additive genetic variation about these population-level allometric functions. We detected significant allometry, with larger fish having relatively smaller heads, a longer base to their second dorsal fin, and longer, shallower caudal peduncles. There was additive genetic variance in body size and in size-independent body shape (i.e., allometric elevation), but typically not in allometric slopes. These results suggest that the parallel evolution of body shape in threespine stickleback is not likely to have been a correlated response to selection on body size, or vice versa. Although allometry is common in fishes, this study highlights the need for additional data on genetic variation in allometric functions to determine how allometry evolves and how it influences phenotypic evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21558260     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icq026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  15 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives on the genetic architecture of divergence in body shape in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Duncan T Reid; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 2.  Iterative development and the scope for plasticity: contrasts among trait categories in an adaptive radiation.

Authors:  S A Foster; M A Wund; M A Graham; R L Earley; R Gardiner; T Kearns; J A Baker
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Mark Currey; William A Cresko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Ancestral Plasticity and Allometry in Threespine Stickleback Fish Reveal Phenotypes Associated with Derived, Freshwater Ecotypes.

Authors:  Matthew A Wund; Sophie Valena; Susan Wood; John A Baker
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.138

6.  Divergence of craniofacial developmental trajectories among avian embryos.

Authors:  Francis J Smith; Christopher J Percival; Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Richard A Schneider; Ralph S Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ellis; Craig T Miller
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Innate immune responses to gut microbiota differ between oceanic and freshwater threespine stickleback populations.

Authors:  Kathryn Milligan-Myhre; Clayton M Small; Erika K Mittge; Meghna Agarwal; Mark Currey; William A Cresko; Karen Guillemin
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.758

9.  Novel approach to heritability detection suggests robustness to paternal genotype in a complex morphological trait.

Authors:  Max E Winston; Andrea Thompson; Gabriel Trujillo; Andrew T Burchill; Corrie S Moreau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.