INTRODUCTION: Modulation of neurodegeneration by physical activity is an active topic in contemporary research. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the brain's microstructure in multiple sclerosis (MS) after facilitation physiotherapy. METHODS: Eleven patients with MS were examined using motor and neuropsychological testing and multimodal MRI at the beginning of the study, with second baseline measurement after 1 month without any therapy, and after a 2-month period of facilitation physiotherapy. Eleven healthy controls were examined at the beginning of the study and after 1 month. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (λ (ax)), and radial diffusivity (λ (rad)) were calculated for the whole corpus callosum (CC) in the midsagittal slice of T1W 3D MPRAGE spatially normalized images. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models, paired, and two-sample tests. RESULTS: At the baseline, patients with MS showed significantly lower values in FA (p < 0.001), and significantly higher values in MD (p < 0.001), λ (ax) (p = 0.003), and λ (rad) (p < 0.001) compared to control subjects. The FA, MD, λ (ax), and λ (rad) did not change between the first and second baseline examinations in either group. Differences 2 months after initiating facilitation physiotherapy were in FA, MD, and in λ (rad) significantly higher than differences in healthy controls (p < 0.001 for FA, p = 0.02 for MD, and p = 0.002 for λ (rad)). In MS patients, FA in the CC significantly increased (p < 0.001), MD and λ (rad) significantly decreased (p = 0.014 and p = 0.002), and thus approached the values in healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that facilitation physiotherapy influences brain microstructure measured by DTI.
INTRODUCTION: Modulation of neurodegeneration by physical activity is an active topic in contemporary research. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the brain's microstructure in multiple sclerosis (MS) after facilitation physiotherapy. METHODS: Eleven patients with MS were examined using motor and neuropsychological testing and multimodal MRI at the beginning of the study, with second baseline measurement after 1 month without any therapy, and after a 2-month period of facilitation physiotherapy. Eleven healthy controls were examined at the beginning of the study and after 1 month. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (λ (ax)), and radial diffusivity (λ (rad)) were calculated for the whole corpus callosum (CC) in the midsagittal slice of T1W 3D MPRAGE spatially normalized images. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models, paired, and two-sample tests. RESULTS: At the baseline, patients with MS showed significantly lower values in FA (p < 0.001), and significantly higher values in MD (p < 0.001), λ (ax) (p = 0.003), and λ (rad) (p < 0.001) compared to control subjects. The FA, MD, λ (ax), and λ (rad) did not change between the first and second baseline examinations in either group. Differences 2 months after initiating facilitation physiotherapy were in FA, MD, and in λ (rad) significantly higher than differences in healthy controls (p < 0.001 for FA, p = 0.02 for MD, and p = 0.002 for λ (rad)). In MSpatients, FA in the CC significantly increased (p < 0.001), MD and λ (rad) significantly decreased (p = 0.014 and p = 0.002), and thus approached the values in healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that facilitation physiotherapy influences brain microstructure measured by DTI.
Authors: James C Eliassen; Erin L Boespflug; Martine Lamy; Jane Allendorfer; Wen-Jang Chu; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Katrin Morgen; Nadja Kadom; Lumy Sawaki; Alessandro Tessitore; Joan Ohayon; Henry McFarland; Joseph Frank; Roland Martin; Leonardo G Cohen Journal: Brain Date: 2004-09-29 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: J L Dietemann; C Beigelman; L Rumbach; M Vouge; T Tajahmady; C Faubert; M Y Jeung; A Wackenheim Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 1988 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Nora E Fritz; Anne D Kloos; Deborah A Kegelmeyer; Parminder Kaur; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Ameen Barghi; Jane B Allendorfer; Edward Taub; Brent Womble; Jarrod M Hicks; Gitendra Uswatte; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Victor W Mark Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Dejan B Budimirovic; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Craig A Erickson; Scott S Hall; David Hessl; Allan L Reiss; Margaret K King; Leonard Abbeduto; Walter E Kaufmann Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Sara Llufriu; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Elisabeth Solana; Nuria Sola-Valls; Maria Sepulveda; Yolanda Blanco; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Magi Andorra; Pablo Villoslada; Alberto Prats-Galino; Albert Saiz Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.881