BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute rejection (AR) in heart transplantation relies on histopathological grading of endomyocardial biopsies according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. Intragraft gene expression profiling may be a way to complement histological evaluation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcriptional profiling was performed on 26 endomyocardial biopsies, and expression patterns were compared with the 1990 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation AR grades. Importantly, transcriptional profiles from settings with an equivalent AR grade appeared the same. In addition, grade 0 profiles could not be distinguished from 1A profiles, and grade 3A profiles could not be distinguished from 3B profiles. Comparing the AR groupings (0+1A, 1B, and 3A+3B), 0+1A showed more striking differences from 1B than from 3A+3B. When these findings were extrapolated to the 2005 revised guidelines, the combination of 1A and 1B into a single category (1R) appears to have brought together endomyocardial biopsies with different underlying processes that are not evident from histological evaluation. Grade 1B was associated with upregulated immune response genes, as 1 categorical distinction from grade 1A. Although grade 1B was distinct from the clinically relevant AR grades 3A and 3B, all of these grades shared a small number of overlapping pathways consistent with common physiological underpinnings. CONCLUSION: The gene expression similarities and differences identified here in different AR settings have the potential to revise the clinical perspective on acute graft rejection, pending the results of larger studies.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute rejection (AR) in heart transplantation relies on histopathological grading of endomyocardial biopsies according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. Intragraft gene expression profiling may be a way to complement histological evaluation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcriptional profiling was performed on 26 endomyocardial biopsies, and expression patterns were compared with the 1990 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation AR grades. Importantly, transcriptional profiles from settings with an equivalent AR grade appeared the same. In addition, grade 0 profiles could not be distinguished from 1A profiles, and grade 3A profiles could not be distinguished from 3B profiles. Comparing the AR groupings (0+1A, 1B, and 3A+3B), 0+1A showed more striking differences from 1B than from 3A+3B. When these findings were extrapolated to the 2005 revised guidelines, the combination of 1A and 1B into a single category (1R) appears to have brought together endomyocardial biopsies with different underlying processes that are not evident from histological evaluation. Grade 1B was associated with upregulated immune response genes, as 1 categorical distinction from grade 1A. Although grade 1B was distinct from the clinically relevant AR grades 3A and 3B, all of these grades shared a small number of overlapping pathways consistent with common physiological underpinnings. CONCLUSION: The gene expression similarities and differences identified here in different AR settings have the potential to revise the clinical perspective on acute graft rejection, pending the results of larger studies.
Authors: Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: M C Deng; H J Eisen; M R Mehra; M Billingham; C C Marboe; G Berry; J Kobashigawa; F L Johnson; R C Starling; S Murali; D F Pauly; H Baron; J G Wohlgemuth; R N Woodward; T M Klingler; D Walther; P G Lal; S Rosenberg; S Hunt Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: C C Baan; C H Holweg; T van Gelder; C J Knoop; H G Niesters; P Zondervan; B Mochtar; A H Balk; W Weimar Journal: Transpl Int Date: 1998 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Charles C Marboe; Margaret Billingham; Howard Eisen; Mario C Deng; Helen Baron; Mandeep Mehra; Sharon Hunt; Jay Wohlgemuth; Irfan Mahmood; James Prentice; Gerald Berry Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Roland Klingenberg; Christian Gleissner; Achim Koch; Philipp A Schnabel; Falk-Udo Sack; Rainer Zimmermann; Hugo A Katus; Thomas J Dengler Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: E C Pérez; N Shulzhenko; A Morgun; R V Z Diniz; D R Almeida; C C Musatti; M Gerbase-DeLima Journal: Hum Immunol Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 2.850
Authors: Ayesha I De Souza; Leanne E Felkin; Ann M McCormack; Angela Holder; Paul J R Barton; Nicholas R Banner; Marlene L Rose Journal: Transplantation Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: I Borozan; L Chen; J Sun; L-L Tannis; M Guindi; O D Rotstein; J Heathcote; A M Edwards; D Grant; I D McGilvray Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Zhengzi Yi; Karen L Keung; Li Li; Min Hu; Bo Lu; Leigh Nicholson; Elvira Jimenez-Vera; Madhav C Menon; Chengguo Wei; Stephen Alexander; Barbara Murphy; Philip J O'Connell; Weijia Zhang Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-08-06
Authors: Tej D Azad; Michele Donato; Line Heylen; Andrew B Liu; Shai S Shen-Orr; Timothy E Sweeney; Jonathan Scott Maltzman; Maarten Naesens; Purvesh Khatri Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-01-25
Authors: Erick Romero; Eleanor Chang; Esteban Tabak; Diego Pinheiro; Jose Tallaj; Silvio Litovsky; Brendan Keating; Mario Deng; Martin Cadeiras Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Ruud B van Heeswijk; Davide Piccini; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Samuel Rotman; Philippe Meyer; Juerg Schwitter; Matthias Stuber; Roger Hullin Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2017-03-28
Authors: Davy Vanhoutte; Geert C van Almen; Lucas N L Van Aelst; Johan Van Cleemput; Walter Droogné; Yu Jin; Frans Van de Werf; Peter Carmeliet; Johan Vanhaecke; Anna-Pia Papageorgiou; Stephane Heymans Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christian Krieghoff; Markus J Barten; Lysann Hildebrand; Matthias Grothoff; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Christian Lücke; Claudia Andres; Stefan Nitzsche; Franziska Riese; Martin Strüber; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Matthias Gutberlet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 5.315