PURPOSE: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) commonly expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is associated with poor clinical outcome. Cetuximab is a chimerized monoclonal antibody that targets the EGFR and, in preclinical models, it demonstrates radiosensitization properties. We report a phase II trial testing the combination of cetuximab with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable stage III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included unresectable stage III NSCLC, Zubrod performance status ≤ 1, weight loss ≤ 5%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥ 1.2 L, and adequate organ function. Patients received an initial dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of week 1 and then weekly doses of cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) until completion of therapy (weeks 2 through 17). During week 2, patients started CRT (63 Gy in 35 fractions) with weekly carboplatin at area under the [concentration-time] curve (AUC) 2 and six doses of paclitaxel at 45 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin (AUC 6) and two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) during weeks 12 through 17. Primary end points included safety and compliance of concurrent cetuximab and CRT. RESULTS: In all, 93 patients were enrolled and 87 were evaluable. Median follow-up was 21.6 months. Response rate was 62% (n = 54), median survival was 22.7 months, and 24-month overall survival was 49.3%. Adverse events related to treatment included 20% grade 4 hematologic toxicities, 8% grade 3 esophagitis, and 7% grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were five grade 5 events. CONCLUSION: The combination of cetuximab with CRT is feasible and shows promising activity. The median and overall survival achieved with this regimen were longer than any previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
PURPOSE:Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) commonly expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is associated with poor clinical outcome. Cetuximab is a chimerized monoclonal antibody that targets the EGFR and, in preclinical models, it demonstrates radiosensitization properties. We report a phase II trial testing the combination of cetuximab with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable stage III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included unresectable stage III NSCLC, Zubrod performance status ≤ 1, weight loss ≤ 5%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≥ 1.2 L, and adequate organ function. Patients received an initial dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of week 1 and then weekly doses of cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) until completion of therapy (weeks 2 through 17). During week 2, patients started CRT (63 Gy in 35 fractions) with weekly carboplatin at area under the [concentration-time] curve (AUC) 2 and six doses of paclitaxel at 45 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin (AUC 6) and two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) during weeks 12 through 17. Primary end points included safety and compliance of concurrent cetuximab and CRT. RESULTS: In all, 93 patients were enrolled and 87 were evaluable. Median follow-up was 21.6 months. Response rate was 62% (n = 54), median survival was 22.7 months, and 24-month overall survival was 49.3%. Adverse events related to treatment included 20% grade 4 hematologic toxicities, 8% grade 3 esophagitis, and 7% grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were five grade 5 events. CONCLUSION: The combination of cetuximab with CRT is feasible and shows promising activity. The median and overall survival achieved with this regimen were longer than any previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: C Bianco; R Bianco; G Tortora; V Damiano; P Guerrieri; P Montemaggi; J Mendelsohn; S De Placido; A R Bianco; F Ciardiello Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M N Saleh; K P Raisch; M A Stackhouse; W E Grizzle; J A Bonner; M S Mayo; H G Kim; R F Meredith; R H Wheeler; D J Buchsbaum Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: K Furuse; M Fukuoka; M Kawahara; H Nishikawa; Y Takada; S Kudoh; N Katagami; Y Ariyoshi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Baselga; D Pfister; M R Cooper; R Cohen; B Burtness; M Bos; G D'Andrea; A Seidman; L Norton; K Gunnett; J Falcey; V Anderson; H Waksal; J Mendelsohn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C J Bruns; M T Harbison; D W Davis; C A Portera; R Tsan; D J McConkey; D B Evans; J L Abbruzzese; D J Hicklin; R Radinsky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David R Gandara; Kari Chansky; Kathy S Albain; Bryan R Leigh; Laurie E Gaspar; Primo N Lara; Howard Burris; Paul Gumerlock; J Philip Kuebler; James D Bearden; John Crowley; Robert Livingston Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert Pirker; Jose R Pereira; Aleksandra Szczesna; Joachim von Pawel; Maciej Krzakowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Ihor Vynnychenko; Keunchil Park; Chih-Teng Yu; Valentyn Ganul; Jae-Kyung Roh; Emilio Bajetta; Kenneth O'Byrne; Filippo de Marinis; Wilfried Eberhardt; Thomas Goddemeier; Michael Emig; Ulrich Gatzemeier Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: F Couñago; A Rodríguez; P Calvo; J Luna; J L Monroy; B Taboada; V Díaz; N Rodríguez de Dios Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.405