Literature DB >> 21555359

Nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility and inefficient development of pig-mouse cytoplasmic hybrid embryos.

Dasari Amarnath1, Inchul Choi, Adel R Moawad, Teruhiko Wakayama, Keith H S Campbell.   

Abstract

Inter-species somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) embryos usually fail to develop to the blastocyst stage and beyond due to incomplete reprogramming of donor cell. We evaluated whether using a karyoplast that would require less extensive reprogramming such as an embryonic blastomere or the meiotic spindle from metaphase II oocytes would provide additional insight into the development of iSCNT embryos. Our results showed that karyoplasts of embryonic or oocyte origin are no different from somatic cells; all iSCNT embryos, irrespective of karyoplast origin, were arrested during early development. We hypothesized that nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility could be another reason for failure of embryonic development from iSCNT. We used pig-mouse cytoplasmic hybrids as a model to address nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility in iSCNT embryos. Fertilized murine zygotes were reconstructed by fusing with porcine cytoplasts of varying cytoplasmic volumes (1/10 (small) and 1/5 (large) total volume of mouse zygote). The presence of pig cytoplasm significantly reduced the development of mouse zygotes to the blastocyst stage compared with control embryos at 120 h post-human chorionic gondotropin (41 vs 6 vs 94%, P<0.05; 1/10, 1/5, control respectively). While mitochondrial DNA copy numbers remained relatively unchanged, expression of several important genes namely Tfam, Polg, Polg2, Mfn2, Slc2a3 (Glut3), Slc2a1 (Glut1), Bcl2, Hspb1, Pou5f1 (Oct4), Nanog, Cdx2, Gata3, Tcfap2c, mt-Cox1 and mt-Cox2 was significantly reduced in cytoplasmic hybrids compared with control embryos. These results demonstrate that the presence of even a small amount of porcine cytoplasm is detrimental to murine embryo development and suggest that a range of factors are likely to contribute to the failure of inter-species nuclear transfer embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21555359     DOI: 10.1530/REP-11-0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  11 in total

Review 1.  Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer: advancements and problems.

Authors:  Irina Lagutina; Helena Fulka; Giovanna Lazzari; Cesare Galli
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Transgenic chicken, mice, cattle, and pig embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer into pig oocytes.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar Gupta; Ziban Chandra Das; Young Tae Heo; Jin Young Joo; Hak-Jae Chung; Hyuk Song; Jae-Hwan Kim; Nam-Hyung Kim; Hoon Taek Lee; Dae Hwan Ko; Sang Jun Uhm
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  A radiation hybrid map of chromosome 1D reveals synteny conservation at a wheat speciation locus.

Authors:  Monika K Michalak de Jimenez; Filippo M Bassi; Farhad Ghavami; Kristin Simons; Rissa Dizon; Raed I Seetan; Loai M Alnemer; Anne M Denton; Münevver Doğramacı; Hana Šimková; Jaroslav Doležel; Kiran Seth; Ming-Cheng Luo; Jan Dvorak; Yong Qiang Gu; Shahryar F Kianian
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Interspecies nuclear transfer using fibroblasts from leopard, tiger, and lion ear piece collected postmortem as donor cells and rabbit oocytes as recipients.

Authors:  Uma Mahesh Yelisetti; Suman Komjeti; Venu Charan Katari; Shivaji Sisinthy; Sambasiva Rao Brahmasani
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Mitochondrial physiology and gene expression analyses reveal metabolic and translational dysregulation in oocyte-induced somatic nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Telma C Esteves; Olympia E Psathaki; Martin J Pfeiffer; Sebastian T Balbach; Dagmar Zeuschner; Hiroshi Shitara; Hiromichi Yonekawa; Marcin Siatkowski; Georg Fuellen; Michele Boiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Irregular transcriptome reprogramming probably causes thec developmental failure of embryos produced by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer between the Przewalski's gazelle and the bovine.

Authors:  Yongchun Zuo; Yu Gao; Guanghua Su; Chunling Bai; Zhuying Wei; Kun Liu; Qianzhong Li; Shorgan Bou; Guangpeng Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Lack of effects of ooplasm transfer on early development of interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer bison embryos.

Authors:  L Antonio González-Grajales; Laura A Favetta; W Allan King; Gabriela F Mastromonaco
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 8.  Reprogramming and development in nuclear transfer embryos and in interspecific systems.

Authors:  Patrick Narbonne; Kei Miyamoto; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Preimplantation death of xenomitochondrial mouse embryo harbouring bovine mitochondria.

Authors:  Manabu Kawahara; Shiori Koyama; Satomi Iimura; Wataru Yamazaki; Aiko Tanaka; Nanami Kohri; Keisuke Sasaki; Masashi Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Coexpression analysis identifies nuclear reprogramming barriers of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Yongchun Zuo; Guanghua Su; Lei Cheng; Kun Liu; Yu Feng; Zhuying Wei; Chunling Bai; Guifang Cao; Guangpeng Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.