Literature DB >> 21555124

Early results after vertebral body stenting for fractures of the anterior column of the thoracolumbar spine.

Zdenek Klezl1, Haroon Majeed, Rajendranath Bommireddy, Joby John.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty have shown to improve pain and functional outcome in cases with symptomatic vertebral fractures. Although restoration of the vertebral body height and kyphosis seemed to be easier with balloon kyphoplasty, it became clear that some of the correction achieved by the balloon is lost once it was deflated. Vertebral body stent was developed to eliminate this phenomenon. To our knowledge this is the first study in describing this technique in clinical settings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with 20 fractured vertebral bodies were included. All fractures were Type A1.3 or A3.1 (incomplete burst). Information about pain (visual analogue scale-VAS) and function (Oswestry disability index-ODI) and vertebral body deformity (vertebral angle-VA) was recorded in a prospective way at regular intervals. Patients were classified into osteoporotic group (7 patients) and traumatic groups (10 patients, younger than 60 years).
RESULTS: There were 6 male and 11 female patients with mean age of 58.1 years (31-88 years). Mean follow up was 12 months. The preoperative pain level showed a mean VAS score of 8.9 in osteoporotic group and 9.7 in traumatic group. Postoperatively, in osteoporotic group, mean VAS was 4.8 at 6 weeks, 4.0 at 6 months and 2.5 at 12 months compared with traumatic fracture group where it was 2.7 at 6 weeks, 2.2 at 6 months and 1.6 at 12 months. Mean ODI in osteoporotic group was 41.7% (14-58%) and in traumatic group it was 20.4% (6-33%). Mean vertebral body angle prior to surgery in osteoporotic group was 9.7 whilst postoperatively it was 5.2°; so the mean correction achieved was 4.5°. In traumatic group preoperative VA was 13° whilst postoperatively it was 5.7°; therefore the mean correction achieved was 7.3°. None of the patients lost reduction at their last follow up.
CONCLUSION: Vertebral body stenting leads to satisfactory improvement in pain, function and kyphosis correction in the treatment of osteoporotic and traumatic fractures. Anterior spinal column, especially the fragmented superior endplate is nicely reconstructed by the stent provided it is inserted accurately. With addition of posterior transpedicular instrumentation, indications for this technique may be wider covering some Type B and C fractures with similar vertebral body damage.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21555124     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  11 in total

1.  Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superior to kyphoplasty?

Authors:  Sebastian Schützenberger; S M Schwarz; L Greiner; O Holub; S Grabner; W Huf; A Sailler; C Fialka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt; U Spiegl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Vertebral balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting in non-osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at the thoracolumbar junction: a comparative radiological study and finite element analysis (BONEXP study).

Authors:  Tanguy Vendeuvre; Paul Brossard; Jean-Baptiste Pic; Maxime Billot; Louis-Etienne Gayet; Pierre Pries; Simon Teyssédou; Arnaud Germaneau; Philippe Rigoard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES.

Authors:  Diogo Filipe Lino Moura; Josué Pereira Gabriel
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 0.683

5.  Surgical procedure and initial radiographic results of a new augmentation technique for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Nogler; Michaela Gstöttner; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Third-generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation systems.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Renato Galzio; Anna Kazakova; Andrea Pantalone; Giovanni Grillea; Marcello Bartolo; Vincenzo Salini; Vincenzo Magliani
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

7.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polyethylene mesh and allograft bone for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  C Schulz; U Kunz; U M Mauer; R Mathieu
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-01-26

8.  Treatment of Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

Authors:  Akhil P Verheyden; Ulrich J Spiegl; Helmut Ekkerlein; Erol Gercek; Stefan Hauck; Christoph Josten; Frank Kandziora; Sebastian Katscher; Philipp Kobbe; Christian Knop; Wolfgang Lehmann; Rainer H Meffert; Christian W Müller; Axel Partenheimer; Christian Schinkel; Philipp Schleicher; Matti Scholz; Christoph Ulrich; Alexander Hoelzl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07

9.  Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review.

Authors:  Peter Diel; Christoph Röder; Gosia Perler; Thomas Vordemvenne; Matti Scholz; Frank Kandziora; Sebastian Fürderer; Soren Eiskjaer; Gianluca Maestretti; Robert Rotter; Lorin Michael Benneker; Paul Friedhelm Heini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  High-viscosity bone cement for vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study on intravertebral diffusion and leakage of bone cement.

Authors:  Meiyong Wang; Qunhua Jin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.