Literature DB >> 21554940

First explanations for differences in electrotransfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo using spheroid model.

L Chopinet1, L Wasungu, M-P Rols.   

Abstract

Electro-gene-therapy is a promising technique for cancer treatment. However, knowledge about mechanism of gene transfer with electric field in tumor is limited. Whereas in vitro electrotransfection is efficient, gene expression in tumoral cells in vivo is weak. To determine reasons for this difference and unravel gene transfer mechanisms, we propose to use multicellular tumor spheroid as a tridimensional model ex vivo. Comparison of efficiency between cell in suspension and cells in spheroid allow highlighting fundamental differences. For classical electrical conditions (consisting in 10 pulses of 500V/cm, 5ms, 1Hz), suspension cells present a transfection rate of 23.75%±2.450 SEM. In the same conditions on spheroid, although plasmid DNA coding GFP interact with half of electrically permeabilized cells, less than 1% of cells are expressing the transgene. First answers to in vivo electrotransfection failure are given: cell mortality due to electric field is responsible of this low transfection rate, as tridimensional and multicellular structure that prevents DNA passage. These results show that spheroid is reproducing in vivo situation. Validation of spheroid as a relevant model for electrotransfection study opens ex vivo optimization possibility before in vivo assay.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21554940     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  8 in total

1.  3D spheroids' sensitivity to electric field pulses depends on their size.

Authors:  Laure Gibot; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  The Electrorotation as a Tool to Monitor the Dielectric Properties of Spheroid During the Permeabilization.

Authors:  C I Trainito; E Bayart; F Subra; O Français; B Le Pioufle
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Efficient In Vitro Electropermeabilization of Reconstructed Human Dermal Tissue.

Authors:  Moinecha Madi; Marie-Pierre Rols; Laure Gibot
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  The use of an in vitro 3D melanoma model to predict in vivo plasmid transfection using electroporation.

Authors:  Bernadette Marrero; Richard Heller
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Nanosecond electric pulse effects on gene expression.

Authors:  Louise Chopinet; Tina Batista-Napotnik; Audrey Montigny; Matej Rebersek; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Upregulation of DNA Sensors in B16.F10 Melanoma Spheroid Cells After Electrotransfer of pDNA.

Authors:  Katarina Znidar; Masa Bosnjak; Tanja Jesenko; Loree C Heller; Maja Cemazar
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

7.  A journey from the endothelium to the tumor tissue: distinct behavior between PEO-PCL micelles and polymersomes nanocarriers.

Authors:  Agathe Figarol; Laure Gibot; Muriel Golzio; Barbara Lonetti; Anne-Françoise Mingotaud; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.419

8.  Dielectrophoretic Traps for Efficient Bead and Cell Trapping and Formation of Aggregates of Controlled Size and Composition.

Authors:  Clémentine Lipp; Laure Koebel; Arnaud Bertsch; Michaël Gauthier; Aude Bolopion; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.