Literature DB >> 21554838

Comparison of auditory electrophysiological responses in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus.

S Singh1, S K Munjal, N K Panda.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tinnitus is a disturbing symptom and is often the main reason for otology referral. It is usually associated with hearing loss of varying aetiology, and is thought to begin in the cochlea, with later abnormal central activity. We hypothesise that tinnitus without hearing loss may be caused by central and subcortical abnormalities and altered outer hair cell function. AIM: To compare the auditory brainstem responses, middle latency responses and otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing individuals with and without tinnitus.
METHODOLOGY: The audiological test results of 25 normal hearing subjects with tinnitus (age 18-45 years) were determined, and compared with those of a control group.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between study group tinnitus ears vs control group ears, as regards wave I latency prolongation, shortening of wave V and absolute I-III and I-V interpeak latency, enlargement of wave Na and Pa amplitude, and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emission signal-to-noise ratios. There was no statistically significant difference between unilateral vs bilateral tinnitus ears.
CONCLUSION: The pathogenesis and optimum management of tinnitus are still unclear. It often occurs with primary ear disease, usually associated with hearing loss, but may occur in patients with normal hearing. Observed changes in auditory brainstem and middle latency responses indicate central auditory alterations. Tinnitus involves both peripheral and central activity, and complete audiological and neurophysiological investigation is required. Management should be based on both audiological and neurophysiological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21554838     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215111000569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  8 in total

Review 1.  Towards a Mechanistic-Driven Precision Medicine Approach for Tinnitus.

Authors:  Thanos Tzounopoulos; Carey Balaban; Lori Zitelli; Catherine Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  A Study of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Normal Hearing Patients with Tinnitus.

Authors:  G Ravikumar; V Ashok Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-09-26

3.  Auditory Brainstem Response in Patients of Tinnitus with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar Majhi; Kirti Khandelwal; Mohamed Shareef
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-04

4.  'Is tinnitus accompanied by hemifacial spasm in normal-hearing patients also a type of hyperactive neurovascular compression syndrome? : A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Won Seok Chang; Bong Soo Kim; Ji Eun Lee; Hyun Ho Jung; Kiwoong Kim; Hyuk Chan Kwon; Yong Ho Lee; Jin Woo Chang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Gap prepulse inhibition and auditory brainstem-evoked potentials as objective measures for tinnitus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Susanne Dehmel; Daniel Eisinger; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-31

6.  Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (MLAEP) in Workers with and without Tinnitus who are Exposed to Occupational Noise.

Authors:  Valdete Alves Valentins dos Santos Filha; Alessandra Giannella Samelli; Carla Gentile Matas
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 7.  Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What?

Authors:  Victoria Milloy; Philippe Fournier; Daniel Benoit; Arnaud Noreña; Amineh Koravand
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 8.  Objective Detection of Tinnitus Based on Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Shuwen Fan; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.