OBJECTIVES: To assess if flow-sensitive four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging adds value in diagnosing patients with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. METHODS: In six patients with echocardiographically suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, anatomy was evaluated using standard magnetic resonance imaging including angiography. Functional analysis included shunt calculations from flow measurements. We used four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging for visualisation of maldraining pulmonary veins and quantification of flow via the maldraining veins and interatrial communications, if present. RESULTS: In all patients, the diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage was confirmed by standard magnetic resonance imaging. Shunt volumes ranged from 1.4:1 to 4.7:1. Drainage sites were the superior caval vein (n = 5) or the vertical vein (n = 1). Multiple maldraining pulmonary veins were found in three patients. Pulmonary arteries and veins could be clearly distinguished by selective visualisation using four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Flow measured individually in maldraining pulmonary veins in six patients and across the interatrial communication in three patients revealed a percentage of the overall shunt volume of 30-100% and 58-70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selective visualisation of individual vessels and their flow characteristics by four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging facilitates in distinguishing adjacent pulmonary arteries and veins and thus improves the accurate diagnosis of maldraining pulmonary veins. By detailed quantification of shunt volumes, additional information for planning of treatment strategies is provided. This method adds clinical value and might replace contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in these patients in the future.
OBJECTIVES: To assess if flow-sensitive four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging adds value in diagnosing patients with suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. METHODS: In six patients with echocardiographically suspected partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, anatomy was evaluated using standard magnetic resonance imaging including angiography. Functional analysis included shunt calculations from flow measurements. We used four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging for visualisation of maldraining pulmonary veins and quantification of flow via the maldraining veins and interatrial communications, if present. RESULTS: In all patients, the diagnosis of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage was confirmed by standard magnetic resonance imaging. Shunt volumes ranged from 1.4:1 to 4.7:1. Drainage sites were the superior caval vein (n = 5) or the vertical vein (n = 1). Multiple maldraining pulmonary veins were found in three patients. Pulmonary arteries and veins could be clearly distinguished by selective visualisation using four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Flow measured individually in maldraining pulmonary veins in six patients and across the interatrial communication in three patients revealed a percentage of the overall shunt volume of 30-100% and 58-70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selective visualisation of individual vessels and their flow characteristics by four-dimensional velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging facilitates in distinguishing adjacent pulmonary arteries and veins and thus improves the accurate diagnosis of maldraining pulmonary veins. By detailed quantification of shunt volumes, additional information for planning of treatment strategies is provided. This method adds clinical value and might replace contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in these patients in the future.