Literature DB >> 21553970

Work-based predictors of mortality: a 20-year follow-up of healthy employees.

Arie Shirom1, Sharon Toker, Yasmin Alkaly, Orit Jacobson, Ran Balicer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effects of the Job-Demand-Control-Support (JDC-S) model's components, workload, control, peer and supervisor social support, on the risk of all-cause mortality. Also examined was the expectation that the above work-based components interact in predicting all-cause mortality. The study's hypotheses were tested after controlling for physiological variables and health behaviors known to be risk factors for mortality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The design used was prospective. Baseline data were obtained from healthy employees (N = 820) who underwent periodic health examinations in 1988. Follow-up data on all-cause mortality were obtained from the participants' computerized medical file, kept by their HMO, in 2008. The baseline data covered socioeconomic, behavioral, and biological risk factors in addition to the components of the JDC-S model. During the period of follow-up, 53 deaths were recorded. Data were analyzed using Cox regressions.
RESULTS: Only one main effect was found: the risk of mortality was significantly lower for those reporting high levels of peer social support. The study found two significant interactions. Higher levels of control reduced the risk of mortality for the men and increased it for the women. The main effect of peer social support on mortality risk was significantly higher for those whose baseline age ranged from 38 to 43 but not for the older than 43 or the younger than 38 participants.
CONCLUSION: Peer social support is a protective factor, reducing the risk of mortality, while perceived control reduces the risk of mortality among men but increases it among women. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553970     DOI: 10.1037/a0023138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  7 in total

1.  Using effort-reward imbalance theory to understand high rates of depression and anxiety among clergy.

Authors:  Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell; Andrew Miles; Matthew Toth; Christopher Adams; Bruce W Smith; David Toole
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Stone Throwing in the Glass House.

Authors:  James Anthony Lin
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Directive and nondirective social support in the workplace - is this social support distinction important for subjective health complaints, job satisfaction, and perception of job demands and job control?

Authors:  Tone Langjordet Johnsen; Hege Randi Eriksen; Aage Indahl; Torill Helene Tveito
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Rosemarie Schwenker; Eric Sven Kroeber; Tobias Deutsch; Thomas Frese; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Occupational stress and risk for Parkinson's disease: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Johanna Sieurin; Ross Andel; Annika Tillander; Elise G Valdes; Nancy L Pedersen; Karin Wirdefeldt
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 10.338

6.  Sleep disturbance and work-related mental strain: A national prospective cohort study of the prediction of subsequent long-term sickness absence, disability pension and mortality.

Authors:  Torbjörn Åkerstedt; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Syed Rahman
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Associations between combinations of job demands and job control among 6,16,818 people aged 55-64 in paid work with their labour market status 11 years later: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristin Farrants; J Head; E Framke; R Rugulies; K Alexanderson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.015

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.