Dana Patton1, Charles E Moon, Jeff Jones. 1. University of Kentucky, Department of Health Services Management, 121 Washington Ave., Lexington, KY 40536, USA. dana.patton@uky.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined findings from the 2008 National Association of Local Boards of Health Survey to provide information about this understudied entity to the public health community. METHODS: The survey instrument consisted of 196 items covering five parts: (1) demographics; (2) composition and organizational structure; (3) roles, responsibilities, and authorities; (4) telecommunications infrastructure; and (5) concerns and needs. The survey was sent to chairs of local boards of health (LBHs) in 2008 (n = 3,276). After six months of follow-ups and reminders, and a month of data cleaning and screening, the final sample consisted of 870 respondents, for a return rate of 27%. RESULTS: LBHs tend to represent smaller communities and are primarily appointed. Governing and policy-making boards are more prevalent than advisory boards. Most boards do not have official websites or e-mail addresses of board members available to the public; however, most report the capability to receive training via webcasts. Boards express concerns and needs in a variety of areas, particularly public health law, strategic planning, and accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the more than 3,000 LBHs across the United States that are often charged with making and enforcing public health law. This article is a first step toward providing the public health community with information about LBHs based on survey data.
OBJECTIVES: We examined findings from the 2008 National Association of Local Boards of Health Survey to provide information about this understudied entity to the public health community. METHODS: The survey instrument consisted of 196 items covering five parts: (1) demographics; (2) composition and organizational structure; (3) roles, responsibilities, and authorities; (4) telecommunications infrastructure; and (5) concerns and needs. The survey was sent to chairs of local boards of health (LBHs) in 2008 (n = 3,276). After six months of follow-ups and reminders, and a month of data cleaning and screening, the final sample consisted of 870 respondents, for a return rate of 27%. RESULTS: LBHs tend to represent smaller communities and are primarily appointed. Governing and policy-making boards are more prevalent than advisory boards. Most boards do not have official websites or e-mail addresses of board members available to the public; however, most report the capability to receive training via webcasts. Boards express concerns and needs in a variety of areas, particularly public health law, strategic planning, and accreditation. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the more than 3,000 LBHs across the United States that are often charged with making and enforcing public health law. This article is a first step toward providing the public health community with information about LBHs based on survey data.
Authors: Gulzar H Shah; Sergey Sotnikov; Carolyn J Leep; Jiali Ye; Timothy W Van Wave Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 9.308