Literature DB >> 21553126

Visual stimuli that elicit appetitive behaviors in three morphologically distinct species of praying mantis.

Frederick R Prete1, Justin L Komito, Salina Dominguez, Gavin Svenson, LeoLin Y López, Alex Guillen, Nicole Bogdanivich.   

Abstract

We assessed the differences in appetitive responses to visual stimuli by three species of praying mantis (Insecta: Mantodea), Tenodera aridifolia sinensis, Mantis religiosa, and Cilnia humeralis. Tethered, adult females watched computer generated stimuli (erratically moving disks or linearly moving rectangles) that varied along predetermined parameters. Three responses were scored: tracking, approaching, and striking. Threshold stimulus size (diameter) for tracking and striking at disks ranged from 3.5 deg (C. humeralis) to 7.8 deg (M. religiosa), and from 3.3 deg (C. humeralis) to 11.7 deg (M. religiosa), respectively. Unlike the other species which struck at disks as large as 44 deg, T. a. sinensis displayed a preference for 14 deg disks. Disks moving at 143 deg/s were preferred by all species. M. religiosa exhibited the most approaching behavior, and with T. a. sinensis distinguished between rectangular stimuli moving parallel versus perpendicular to their long axes. C. humeralis did not make this distinction. Stimulus sizes that elicited the target behaviors were not related to mantis size. However, differences in compound eye morphology may be related to species differences: C. humeralis' eyes are farthest apart, and it has an apparently narrower binocular visual field which may affect retinal inputs to movement-sensitive visual interneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553126     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-011-0649-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Modeling the physiological responses of anuran R3 ganglion cells.

Authors:  F Gaillard; M A Arbib; F J Corbacho; H B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Saccadic tracking of a light grey target in the mantis, Tenodera aridifolia.

Authors:  Y Yamawaki
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Response properties of visual interneurons to motion stimuli in the praying mantis, Tenodera aridifolia.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Yamawaki; Yoshihiro Toh
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.931

4.  Effect of early feeding experience on subsequent prey preference by cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq; Raymond Chichery; Roseline Poirier; Ludovic Dickel
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Vertical disparity and binocular vision in the praying mantis.

Authors:  S Rossel; U Mathis; T Collett
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  A descending contralateral directionally selective movement detector in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Yamawaki; Yoshihiro Toh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Stimulus speed and order of presentation effect the visually released predatory behaviors of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.).

Authors:  F R Prete; P J Placek; M A Wilson; R J Mahaffey; R R Nemcek
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Non-predatory ingestive behaviors of the praying mantids Tenodera aridifolia sinensis (Sauss.) and Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.).

Authors:  F R Prete; H Lum; S P Grossman
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  The significance of head movements in distance discrimination in praying mantis larvae

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Stimulus configuration and location in the visual field affect appetitive responses by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.).

Authors:  F R Prete
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  5 in total

1.  The discerning predator: decision rules underlying prey classification by a mosquito-eating jumping spider.

Authors:  Ximena J Nelson; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The Role of Central Complex Neurons in Prey Detection and Tracking in the Freely Moving Praying Mantis (Tenodera sinensis).

Authors:  Anne Wosnitza; Joshua P Martin; Alan J Pollack; Gavin J Svenson; Roy E Ritzmann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.342

3.  Aversive Learning in the Praying Mantis (Tenodera aridifolia), a Sit and Wait Predator.

Authors:  Thomas Carle; Rio Horiwaki; Anya Hurlbert; Yoshifumi Yamawaki
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.309

4.  A neuronal correlate of insect stereopsis.

Authors:  Ronny Rosner; Joss von Hadeln; Ghaith Tarawneh; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Innate pattern recognition and categorization in a jumping spider.

Authors:  Yinnon Dolev; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.