Literature DB >> 21553119

Prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in sporadic breast/ovarian cancer patients and identification of a novel de novo BRCA1 mutation in a patient diagnosed with late onset breast and ovarian cancer: implications for genetic testing.

Kim De Leeneer1, Ilse Coene, Brecht Crombez, Justine Simkens, Rudy Van den Broecke, Alain Bols, Barbara Stragier, Ilse Vanhoutte, Anne De Paepe, Bruce Poppe, Kathleen Claes.   

Abstract

In order to adequately evaluate the clinical relevance of genetic testing in sporadic breast and ovarian cancer patients, we offered comprehensive BRCA1/2 mutation analysis in patients without a family history for the disease. We evaluated the complete coding and splice site regions of BRCA1/2 in 193 sporadic patients. In addition, a de novo mutation was further investigated with ultra deep sequencing and microsatellite marker analysis. In 17 patients (8.8%), a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation was identified. The highest mutation detection ratio (3/7 = 42.9%) was obtained in sporadic patients diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancer after the age of 40. In 21 bilateral breast cancer patients, two mutations were identified (9.5%). Furthermore, 140 sporadic patients with unilateral breast cancer were investigated. Mutations were only identified in patients diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 40 (12/128 = 9.4% vs. 0/12 with Dx > 40). No mutations were detected in 17 sporadic male breast cancer and 6 ovarian cancer patients. BRCA1 c.3494_3495delTT was identified in a patient diagnosed with breast and ovarian cancer at the age of 52 and 53, respectively, and was proven to have occurred de novo at the paternal allele. Our study shows that the mutation detection probability in specific patient subsets can be significant, therefore mutation analysis should be considered in sporadic patients. As a consequence, a family history for the disease and an early age of onset should not be used as the only criteria for mutation analysis of BRCA1/2. The relatively high mutation detection ratio suggests that the prevalence of BRCA1/2 may be underestimated, especially in sporadic patients who developed breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, although rare, the possibility of a de novo occurrence in a sporadic patient should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553119     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1544-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

1.  Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation.

Authors:  Siân Jones; Valsamo Anagnostou; Karli Lytle; Sonya Parpart-Li; Monica Nesselbush; David R Riley; Manish Shukla; Bryan Chesnick; Maura Kadan; Eniko Papp; Kevin G Galens; Derek Murphy; Theresa Zhang; Lisa Kann; Mark Sausen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Luis A Diaz; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  BRCA1 promotes unloading of the CMG helicase from a stalled DNA replication fork.

Authors:  David T Long; Vladimir Joukov; Magda Budzowska; Johannes C Walter
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Present and Future Prospect of Small Molecule & Related Targeted Therapy Against Human Cancer.

Authors:  Akshat Pathak; Sanskriti Tanwar; Vivek Kumar; Basu Dev Banarjee
Journal:  Vivechan Int J Res       Date:  2018

4.  Drug-Driven Synthetic Lethality: Bypassing Tumor Cell Genetics with a Combination of AsiDNA and PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Wael Jdey; Sylvain Thierry; Christophe Russo; Flavien Devun; Muthana Al Abo; Patricia Noguiez-Hellin; Jian-Sheng Sun; Emmanuel Barillot; Andrei Zinovyev; Inna Kuperstein; Yves Pommier; Marie Dutreix
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Breast and ovarian cancer predisposition due to de novo BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  L Golmard; C Delnatte; A Laugé; V Moncoutier; C Lefol; K Abidallah; H Tenreiro; F Copigny; M Giraudeau; C Guy; C Barbaroux; G Amorim; A Briaux; V Guibert; J Tarabeux; S Caputo; A Collet; P Gesta; O Ingster; M-H Stern; E Rouleau; A de Pauw; M Gauthier-Villars; B Buecher; S Bézieau; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; C Houdayer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  BRCA-associated ovarian cancer: from molecular genetics to risk management.

Authors:  Giulia Girolimetti; Anna Myriam Perrone; Donatella Santini; Elena Barbieri; Flora Guerra; Simona Ferrari; Claudio Zamagni; Pierandrea De Iaco; Giuseppe Gasparre; Daniela Turchetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Current guidelines for BRCA testing of breast cancer patients are insufficient to detect all mutation carriers.

Authors:  Eli Marie Grindedal; Cecilie Heramb; Inga Karsrud; Sarah Louise Ariansen; Lovise Mæhle; Dag Erik Undlien; Jan Norum; Ellen Schlichting
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Integrating Germline and Somatic Mutation Information for the Discovery of Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jiande Wu; Tarun Karthik Kumar Mamidi; Lu Zhang; Chindo Hicks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  BRCA1/2 variants and copy number alterations status in non familial triple negative breast cancer and high grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Zahra El Ansari; Farah Jouali; Rim Fekkak; Joaira Bakkach; Naima Ghailani Nourouti; Amina Barakat; Mohcine Bennani Mechita; Jamal Fekkak
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Excess Polθ functions in response to replicative stress in homologous recombination-proficient cancer cells.

Authors:  T Goullet de Rugy; M Bashkurov; A Datti; R Betous; L Guitton-Sert; C Cazaux; D Durocher; J S Hoffmann
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.