Literature DB >> 21553076

Left ventricular filling patterns in patients with previous myocardial infarction measured by conventional cine cardiac magnetic resonance.

Gastón A Rodríguez-Granillo1, Marlon Mejía-Campillo, Miguel A Rosales, Gabriel Bolzán, Carlos Ingino, Federico López, Elina Degrossi, Pedro Lylyk.   

Abstract

To explore left ventricular filling patterns in patients with a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI) using time-volume curves obtained from conventional cine-cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations. Consecutive patients with a history of previous MI who were referred for CMR evaluation constituted the study population, and a consecutive cohort of sex and age-matched patients with a normal CMR constituted the control group. The following CMR diastolic parameters were evaluated: peak filling rate (PFR), time to PFR (tPFR), normalised PFR adjusted for diastolic volume at PFR (nPFR), and percent RR interval between end systole and PFR. Fifty patients were included, 25 with a history of previous MI and 25 control. The mean age was 59.6 ± 13.9 years and 27 (54%) were male. Within the control group, age was significantly related to PFR (r = -0.53, p = 0.007), whereas among patients with previous MI age was not related to PFR (r = -0.16, p = 0.44). PFR (252.4 ± 96.7 ml/s vs. 316.0 ± 126.4 ml/s, p = 0.05) and nPFR (1.6 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 1.5, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with previous MI, whereas no significant differences were detected regarding tPFR (143.0 ± 67.5 ms vs. 176.2 ± 83.9 ms, p = 0.13) and % RR to PFR (18.1 ± 9.7% vs. 20.6 ± 12.2%, p = 0.44). MI size was related to LV ejection fraction (r = -0.76, p < 0.001), PFR (r = -0.40, p = 0.004), nPFR (r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and left atrium area (r = 0.40, p = 0.004). Patients at the lowest PFR quartile (<200 ml/s) showed a larger MI size (Q1 26.5 ± 25.5%, Q2 15.5 ± 20.9%, Q3 6.3 ± 12.4%, Q4 8.8 ± 14.1%, p = 0.04). At multivariate analysis, MI size was the only independent predictor of the lowest PFR (p = 0.017). Infarct size has an impact on LV filling profiles, as assessed by conventional cine CMR without additional specific pulse sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553076     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9883-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  11 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Restrictive diastolic filling predicts death after acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  G A Whalley; G D Gamble; R N Doughty
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Current perspectives on cardiac function in patients with diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Jianwen Wang; Sherif F Nagueh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jane M Francis; Saul Myerson; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Radionuclide analysis of peak filling rate, filling fraction, and time to peak filling rate. Response to supine bicycle exercise in normal subjects and patients with coronary disease.

Authors:  G B Mancini; R A Slutsky; S L Norris; V Bhargava; W L Ashburn; C B Higgins
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Age-dependent alterations in fibrillar collagen content and myocardial diastolic function: role of SPARC in post-synthetic procollagen processing.

Authors:  Amy D Bradshaw; Catalin F Baicu; Tyler J Rentz; An O Van Laer; D Dirk Bonnema; Michael R Zile
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Automated segmentation of routine clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Keigo Kawaji; Noel C F Codella; Martin R Prince; Christopher W Chu; Aqsa Shakoor; Troy M LaBounty; James K Min; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Richard B Devereux; Yi Wang; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detection and quantification of fibrosis in human myocardium in vitro.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kehr; Megan Sono; Sumeet S Chugh; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Size and function of the atria.

Authors:  B J M Mulder; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Routine evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a practical approach.

Authors:  Vikas K Rathi; Mark Doyle; June Yamrozik; Ronald B Williams; Ketheswaram Caruppannan; Craig Truman; Diane Vido; Robert Ww Biederman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Effects of alcohol septal ablation on left ventricular diastolic filling patterns in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  You-Zhou Chen; Fu-Jian Duan; Jian-Song Yuan; Feng-Huan Hu; Jin-Gang Cui; Wei-Xian Yang; Yan Zhang; Hao Wang; Shu-Bin Qiao
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Diastolic dysfunction evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance: the value of the combined assessment of atrial and ventricular function.

Authors:  Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Fausto Pizzino; Anna Terrizzi; Scipione Carerj; Bijoy K Khandheria; Gianluca Di Bella
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial perfusion and diastolic function-reference control values for women.

Authors:  May Bakir; Janet Wei; Michael D Nelson; Puja K Mehta; Afsaneh Haftbaradaran; Erika Jones; Edward Gill; Behzad Sharif; Piotr J Slomka; Debiao Li; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Margo Minissian; Daniel S Berman; C Noel Bairey Merz; Louise E J Thomson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02

5.  Volume-time curve of cardiac magnetic resonance assessed left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hua-Yan Xu; Zhi-Gang Yang; Ying-Kun Guo; Ke Shi; Xi Liu; Qin Zhang; Li Jiang; Lin-Jun Xie
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on left ventricular diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension: evaluation by volume-time curve of cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Yan; Yue Gao; Yi Zhang; Ying-Kun Guo; Jin Wang; Li Jiang; Yuan Li; Zhi-Gang Yang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on LV function and central hemodynamics in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Anna Lena Hohneck; Peter Fries; Jonas Stroeder; Günther Schneider; Stephan Henrik Schirmer; Jan-Christian Reil; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs; Florian Custodis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.