We have studied the morphology and the spatially resolved photoluminescence of rubrene thin films at the early stage of crystallization. The initial growth proceeds via the formation of a wetting layer and the nucleation of islands with an amorphous structure. Crystallization starts when the amorphous islands coalesce and needle like crystalline fibers are formed in the gap between islands. The crystalline fibers then grow on top and in between the original amorphous islands leading to an "open network" of islands. The latter acts as the basis for the growth of semi-crystalline spherulites.
We have studied the morphology and the spatially resolved photoluminescence of rubrene thin films at the early stage of crystallization. The initial growth proceeds via the formation of a wetting layer and the nucleation of islands with an amorphous structure. Crystallization starts when the amorphous islands coalesce and needle like crystalline fibers are formed in the gap between islands. The crystalline fibers then grow on top and in between the original amorphous islands leading to an "open network" of islands. The latter acts as the basis for the growth of semi-crystalline spherulites.
Increasing scientific and technological interest is devoted to organic materials for their promising applications in optoelectronic devices such as organic field effect transistors (OFETs) [1,2], light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [3,4], and photovoltaic cells [5]. Because of the favorable overlapping of the π-orbitals of the adjacent molecules, rubrene (C42H28, 5,6,11,12-tetraphenyltetracene) constitutes one of the most promising candidates for the realization of high performance OFETs. Indeed, OFETs based on rubrene single crystals exhibit a very high carrier mobility [6,7]. On the other hand, it is still a great challenge to fabricate OFETs based on rubrene thin films with satisfying electronic properties by organic molecular beam deposition (OMBD) [8,9]. Käfer et al. have shown that the different molecular conformation in gas (nonplanar) and bulk phase (planar) results in a disordered seed layer on the substrate which impedes the growth of ordered thin films [10]. Accordingly, the growth of crystallites with a bulk structure can occur only at particular nucleation sites [10]. Progress has been achieved in improving the crystallinity of rubrene thin films by deposition on organic single crystal substrates [11] or inorganic substrates precovered by organic layers [12], deposition on passivation layer of self-assembled octadecyltrimethylsilane on silica [13], prolonged annealing of amorphous thin films in vacuum [14,15] and by using hot-wall epitaxy (HWE) [16,17]. However, a detailed understanding of the growth mechanism is still missing. It is thus very important to study the growth, especially at its initial stage. It is well known that the crystallinity of rubrene not only influences its electronic performance but also its optical properties [14,15,18-23]. Characteristic photoluminescence (PL) spectra have been reported for amorphous [14] and crystalline phases of rubrene [18,19], respectively. Particularly, it has been demonstrated that the PL spectrum can be used as a sensitive probe for the transformation of thin rubrene films from the amorphous to the polycrystalline phase [15].In the present study, we have investigated the morphology and PL emission of rubrene thin films deposited on muscovite mica (0 0 1) substrates by HWE using a combination of atomic force microscopy (AFM), fluorescence microscopy (FM) and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). Special attention was devoted to the initial stage of crystallization in rubrene thin films. The spatially resolved PL emission measured by LSCM allows us to determine the location and the onset of crystallization.
Experimental
Rubrene thin films were deposited on the (0 0 1) surface of muscovite mica using hot-wall epitaxy (HWE) [24]. The mica substrates were cleaved in air and then transferred into a vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 10−6 mbar. Before rubrene deposition, the substrate was thoroughly degassed by heating for 30 min at 150 °C in vacuum. During deposition, the substrate was kept at 150 °C, while the source and wall temperature was 160 °C. AFM measurements were performed with a Veeco Dimensions S3100 microscope with super sharp silicon tips (Nanosensors SSS-NCHR-50) operated in tapping mode. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti) using a Hg lamp for illumination. The excitation wavelength can be selected within a wide range from UV to red by using different filter cubes. Fluorescence images were acquired with an electron multiplying CCD camera (Luca EMCCD from Andor Technology). In order to investigate the polarization state of the fluorescence signal, a beam splitter (Cairn Research Optosplit II), which allows dual polarisation imaging, was attached in front of the camera. For acquiring the PL spectrum from the field of view of the microscope, a high-resolution spectrometer (HR4000 from Ocean Optics) can be attached to the eyepiece of the microscope. Furthermore, a Nikon Eclipse C1si confocal microscope system equipped with a spectrometer using 32 channel photo-multiplier tube detectors was used to record spatially resolved PL spectra.
Results and discussion
Fig. 1 shows the fluorescence image of rubrene grown on the (0 0 1) surface of muscovite mica. A medium band blue excitation filter (Nikon B-2A, excitation wavelength 390–450 nm) was used for the experiment. The image shows that the surface is covered by islands with an average size of about 3 μm and an average height of about 300 nm. The islands are distributed homogeneously on large terraces over most of the substrate area. From the eyepiece, one can see clearly that the emission of these islands is green under irradiation with blue light. Although the shape of the islands is not really uniform, no preferential orientation of the island is observed. Besides, the top and bottom panels in Fig. 1, which are taken from the same area but with polarization along two orthogonal directions as marked by the arrows, show equal intensities. This observation demonstrates that the rubrene molecules in the islands are randomly oriented, suggesting an amorphous structure of the islands. Indeed, the corresponding PL spectrum plotted in Fig. 2 is very close to that of amorphous rubrene thin films reported by Park et al. [14,15], characterized by a broad peak around 560 nm. Based on the unpolarized nature of the emission and its spectral line shape, we can conclude that the structure of the islands shown in Fig. 1 is amorphous. This conclusion fully agrees with the results of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and transmission electron diffraction (TED) measurements obtained from samples prepared under similar conditions [25]. Thin films with similar morphology and structure have also been observed before the onset of crystallization [12,13,26-29]. The not completely round appearance of the islands is characteristic of the very late stage of amorphous growth [29].
Fig. 1
Fluorescence images recorded from ultrathin rubrene films on mica. The two panels show the same 130 μm wide area but with the polarization of the fluorescence signal oriented along two orthogonal directions as indicated by the arrows in the images.
Fig. 2
Spatially integrated PL spectra recorded from the images presented in Fig. 1 (solid line) and Fig. 3a (dashed line), respectively.
In addition to the typical image presented in Fig. 1, occasionally, areas with different morphology and emission properties can be found on the same sample. Fig. 3a shows such an area containing an open network of islands which emits yellow light. Indeed, the corresponding PL spectrum measured from the same area reveals additional emission features peaked at 570 nm and 645 nm (Fig. 2). In fact, on single crystal rubrene samples, PL emission at the same wavelengths has been reported. According to Mitrofanov et al., the 570 nm and 645 nm features are contributed by the emission from crystalline rubrene and its oxidation state, respectively [18,19]. The central area of the network structure shows a particularly strong emission at these wavelengths with some degree of polarization. To have a closer look at the network structure, the area surrounded by white frame in Fig. 3a was imaged using an objective with larger magnification (60×) and the result is presented in Fig. 3b. In this figure one can clearly see that the yellow islands are those covered and connected by strongly emitting fibers. Besides, it is the emission from these fibers which shows a dependence on the polarization. The morphology of the islands and the fibers on top of them can be seen more clearly in Fig. 3c, which displays an AFM image recorded from the area marked by the white frame in Fig. 3b. Comparing Fig. 3b with Fig. 3c, it is evident that the islands which emit yellow light are those covered by fibers. The thick fibers located in the central area of the network exhibit sharp and straight edges indicating a crystalline structure. The line profile taken from the AFM image in Fig. 3c along the line AB is plotted in the same figure. From this, the cross-sectional profile of the fibers can be resolved, yielding a height of about 50 nm and a width of around 250 nm. Most importantly, from the morphology revealed by AFM and the spectral emission detected by fluorescence microscopy, we conclude that the fibers are crystalline rather than amorphous. Consequently, the open network of yellow islands observed here can be assigned to the initial stage of growth of microcrystalline rubrene films. Similar structures have been reported recently by different authors [13,25]. Particularly, Djuric et al. have investigated samples prepared under similar conditions using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and transmission electron diffraction (TED). Their TEM images show a similar morphology as Fig. 3c. Furthermore, the corresponding TED pattern reveals that these fibers crystallize in an orthorhombic structure [25]. Due to the vrey similar appearance revealed by AFM in this study and TEM by Djuric et al. [25], we believe that the rubrene fibers observed in the current study have the same well orientated crystalline structure.
Fig. 3
(a) Polarization state resolved fluorescence images. (b) Zoom into the area indicated by the white frame in (a). The different polarization states in (a) and (b) are indicated by the white arrows. (c) AFM image recorded from the area surrounded by the white frame in (b). The cross-sectional line profile between points A and B is plotted in the lower left corner.
To study the evolution of the morphology and its influence on the PL emission, LSCM was used to image selected areas from the same sample. Fig. 4a and b shows LSCM images recorded from different areas of the same sample. A 473 nm laser was used as excitation source and the PL signal was detected with the 32 channel spectrometer. The color of the images thus reflects the true emission spectrum. As discussed before, the surface is predominantly covered by small rubrene islands emitting green light (Fig. 4a), which is characteristic of the amorphous nature of these islands. Thanks to the enhanced resolution of LSCM, one can discern in Fig. 4a some examples where yellow needles appear in the gap between two coalescing islands. Taking yellow emission as a signature of crystallinity, the yellow needles can be identified as the nucleation centers of crystalline rubrene. Käfer et al. have argued that the nuclei of rubrene crystalline phase only forms after the growth of an amorphous layer with large nominal thickness [10]. Indeed, our results show that the nucleation of crystalline structures only sets in when the amorphous rubrene islands start to coalesce. In addition, our microscopic study reveals that the nuclei are needle-like crystalline fibers, which initially appear in the gaps between the coalescing islands.
Fig. 4
(a) LSCM image taken from an area dominated by amorphous rubrene islands. (b) LSCM image of islands connected by crystalline fibers. A blue laser with a wavelength of 477 nm was used for excitation.
Indeed, in Fig. 4b, one can see the network of islands covered and linked by these crystalline fibers. Local PL spectra measured from the areas between the islands (area 1), on top of a bare island (area 2), on top of an island covered by fibers (area 3) and a thick fiber (area 4) are plotted in Fig. 5a. In areas 1, 2 and 3, the spectra are dominated by the emission at 540 nm. In contrast, the thick fiber in area 4 shows two well developed emission peaks at 570 nm and 640 nm characteristic of crystalline rubrene. Therefore, in full agreement with what we have concluded before, the islands and the areas in between them are in an amorphous state, whereas the fibers are crystalline. The fact that the areas between the islands present the same PL spectrum as the islands themselves, indicates the presence of an amorphous wetting layer. A closer look at the emission spectrum of area 3, corresponding to an island covered by fibers, reveals that the intensity at wavelengths above 550 nm is comparatively higher than that emitted from area 1 or 2. This effect can be seen more clearly in Fig. 5b, where the normalized difference 2 × ((I3 − I2)/(I3 + I2)) of the PL intensity of area 3 and area 2 is plotted. The line shape of the normalized difference is similar to that of the PL spectrum of area 4 (also shown in Fig. 3b for comparison). Consequently, the enhanced emission above 550 nm from area 3 can be attributed to the emission from the crystalline fibers on top of the islands which, themselves, remain amorphous.
Fig. 5
(a) Local PL spectra recorded from the areas 1, 2, 3, 4 marked in Fig. 5b. (b) Comparison between the PL spectrum of a thick crystalline fiber (area 4) and the normalized difference of the PL intensities within areas 3 and 2 in Fig. 4b.
Conclusion
We have studied the morphology and the spatially resolved PL spectrum of rubrene films grown by hot wall epitaxy on the mica (0 0 1) surface. At first, amorphous islands on top of an amorphous wetting layer are formed upon deposition. The nucleation of crystalline structures sets in when the amorphous rubrene islands start to coalesce and needle-like crystalline fibers appear in the gaps between the coalescing islands. Later, the crystalline fibers spread out and connect the amorphous islands, leading to the formation of a crystalline open network which could be the early stage of the semi-crystalline spherulite growth [13]. The latter develops by consumption of the surrounding amorphous rubrene at the growth front [13,29,30].
Authors: Vikram C Sundar; Jana Zaumseil; Vitaly Podzorov; Etienne Menard; Robert L Willett; Takao Someya; Michael E Gershenson; John A Rogers Journal: Science Date: 2004-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Kowarik; A Gerlach; S Sellner; F Schreiber; J Pflaum; L Cavalcanti; O Konovalov Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Oleg Mitrofanov; David V Lang; Christian Kloc; J Magnus Wikberg; Theo Siegrist; Woo-Young So; M A Sergent; Arthur P Ramirez Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 9.161