Literature DB >> 21552467

Predicting Neoplastic Progression in Barrett's Esophagus.

Jean S Wang1, Marcia I Canto.   

Abstract

Patients with Barrett's esophagus have a significantly increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, 40-125 times higher than the general population. Since only a small fraction of Barrett's esophagus patients will actually progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma, there is a need to develop markers that may accurately predict which patients with Barrett's esophagus are likely to have aggressive disease and progress to cancer versus patients who will remain histologically stable and have a benign course. This would allow for better risk stratification of patients with Barrett's esophagus in order to target aggressive surveillance and intervention towards only those patients at highest risk for neoplastic progression. Predictive biomarkers may thus have significant clinical utility in the management of Barrett's esophagus patients. The detection of dysplasia in esophageal biopsies is currently the only standard method used in clinical practice as a marker for increased risk of cancer. However, dysplasia has not been a accurate or reliable marker for predicting malignant progression and suffers from poor interobserver agreement among pathologists and sampling error. A multitude of potential biomarkers have been studied over the years. It is likely that the best model for predicting progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus patients will ultimately involve a combination of biomarkers, dysplasia grade and other pathological characteristics, as well as clinical and demographic attributes. In this review, we will discuss the most promising biomarkers that have been studied thus far.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21552467      PMCID: PMC3087308     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Gastroentol Hepatol


  126 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  17p (p53) allelic losses, 4N (G2/tetraploid) populations, and progression to aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  P C Galipeau; D S Cowan; C A Sanchez; M T Barrett; M J Emond; D S Levine; P S Rabinovitch; B J Reid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Ralf Kiesslich; Liebwin Gossner; Martin Goetz; Alexandra Dahlmann; Michael Vieth; Manfred Stolte; Arthur Hoffman; Michael Jung; Bernhard Nafe; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang; Richard E Sampliner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Herbert C Wolfsen; Julia E Crook; Murli Krishna; Sami R Achem; Kenneth R Devault; Ernest P Bouras; David S Loeb; Mark E Stark; Timothy A Woodward; Lois L Hemminger; Frances K Cayer; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  17p allelic losses in diploid cells of patients with Barrett's esophagus who develop aneuploidy.

Authors:  P L Blount; P C Galipeau; C A Sanchez; K Neshat; D S Levine; J Yin; H Suzuki; J M Abraham; S J Meltzer; B J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Expansion of the Ki-67 proliferative compartment correlates with degree of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  M K Hong; W B Laskin; B E Herman; M H Johnston; J J Vargo; S M Steinberg; C J Allegra; P G Johnston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  p53 expression in low grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: correlation with interobserver agreement and disease progression.

Authors:  Marek Skacel; Robert E Petras; Lisa A Rybicki; Terry L Gramlich; Joel E Richter; Gary W Falk; John R Goldblum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation.

Authors:  E Montgomery; M P Bronner; J R Goldblum; J K Greenson; M M Haber; J Hart; L W Lamps; G Y Lauwers; A J Lazenby; D N Lewin; M E Robert; A Y Toledano; Y Shyr; K Washington
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. An overrated risk?

Authors:  S J Spechler; A H Robbins; H B Rubins; M E Vincent; T Heeren; W G Doos; T Colton; E M Schimmel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  7 in total

1.  Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani J A Konda; Lusik Cherkezyan; Hariharan Subramanian; Kirsten Wroblewski; Dhwanil Damania; Valentin Becker; Mariano Haba Ruiz Gonzalez; Ann Koons; Michael Goldberg; Mark K Ferguson; Irving Waxman; Hermant K Roy; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Tissue and serum mesothelin are potential markers of neoplastic progression in Barrett's associated esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Elliot L Servais; Laura H Tang; Camelia S Sima; Hans Gerdes; Martin Fleisher; Valerie W Rusch; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  SOX2 as a novel marker to predict neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Sophie van Olphen; Katharina Biermann; Manon C W Spaander; Florine Kastelein; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hans A Stoop; Marco J Bruno; Leendert H J Looijenga
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Barrett's esophagus: an exaggerated risk?

Authors:  Raf Bisschops
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012

5.  Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP3K3/MEKK3) overexpression is an early event in esophageal tumorigenesis and is a predictor of poor disease prognosis.

Authors:  Raghibul Hasan; Rinu Sharma; Anoop Saraya; Tushar K Chattopadhyay; Siddartha DattaGupta; Paul G Walfish; Shyam S Chauhan; Ranju Ralhan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  SPT6 loss permits the transdifferentiation of keratinocytes into an intestinal fate that resembles Barrett's metaplasia.

Authors:  Daniella T Vo; MacKenzie R Fuller; Courtney Tindle; Mahitha Shree Anandachar; Soumita Das; Debashis Sahoo; Pradipta Ghosh
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-09-11

7.  Slug is a predictor of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Md Raghibul Hasan; Rinu Sharma; Anoop Saraya; Tushar K Chattopadhyay; Siddartha DattaGupta; Paul G Walfish; Shyam S Chauhan; Ranju Ralhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.