| Literature DB >> 21552402 |
Mimi Gangopadhyay1, Nirmal Kumar Bhattacharyya, Sailes Ray, Subrata Chakrabarty, Narayan Pandit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early pathological classification of retroperitoneal masses is important for pin-point diagnosis and timely management. AIMS: This study was done to evaluate the usefulness and drawbacks of guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of retroperitoneal masses covering a period of two years with an intention to distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions and to correlate with histologic findings.Entities:
Keywords: Computerized tomography guided; fine needle aspiration cytology; retroperitoneal masses; ultrasound
Year: 2011 PMID: 21552402 PMCID: PMC3083529 DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.76943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cytol ISSN: 0970-9371 Impact factor: 1.000
Age-sex distribution of cases
Distribution of different retroperitoneal SOLs diagnosed by guided FNAC
Figure 1(a) Wilms’ tumor- biphasic tumor, cohesive tubular structure and undifferentiated mesenchymal cells (H and E, ×400); b) Renal cell carcinoma - poorly cohesive cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli (MGG, ×400)
Figure 2(a) Seminoma - dispersed cells against a tigroid background, smudged nuclei and small lymphocytes (H and E, ×400); (b) Yolk sac tumor-vaguely glandular clusters of malignant cells with cytoplasm (H and E, ×400)
Cyto-histologic correlation with sensitivity and specificity
Figure 3(a) Paraganglioma-loosely clustered cells with speckled chromatin and resembling follicular arrangement like in thyroid epithelium (MGG, ×400); (b) Extra-skeletal chondrosarcoma cells with moderately enlarged and irregular nuclei, bi-nucleate forms against a background of pale chondroid material (H and E, ×400)