Aimee M Crago1, Samuel Singer. 1. Sarcoma Disease Management Program, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Liposarcoma, a rare disease, is classified into five histologic subtypes. These include well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), both characterized by chromosome 12q13-15 amplification. This review will focus on the clinical management of WDLS and DDLS and examine recent molecular studies that have the potential to affect clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: Outcome of patients with WDLS and DDLS depends on completeness of surgical resection as well as tumor location and histologic subtype. Risk of recurrence is high for patients with dedifferentiated histology or retroperitoneal location. We now understand that surgical outcomes are poor for patients with rapidly growing or incompletely resectable tumors, so these patients should be managed nonoperatively. Radiation and chemotherapy have low response rates in WDLS and DDLS, but novel agents targeted at chromosome 12 gene products MDM2 and CDK4 have shown promise in preclinical studies and are being tested in clinical trials. Cell line, tissue microarray, and genomic analyses have identified additional targets including ZIC1, TOP2A, AURKA, and IGF-1R, which could form the basis of future therapies. SUMMARY: Although complete surgical resection is currently the most effective treatment for WDLS and DDLS, the majority of patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma will eventually have recurrence and die of disease. It is hoped that a multimodality approach, which incorporates targeted therapies and complete surgical resection, will significantly improve patient outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Liposarcoma, a rare disease, is classified into five histologic subtypes. These include well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), both characterized by chromosome 12q13-15 amplification. This review will focus on the clinical management of WDLS and DDLS and examine recent molecular studies that have the potential to affect clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS: Outcome of patients with WDLS and DDLS depends on completeness of surgical resection as well as tumor location and histologic subtype. Risk of recurrence is high for patients with dedifferentiated histology or retroperitoneal location. We now understand that surgical outcomes are poor for patients with rapidly growing or incompletely resectable tumors, so these patients should be managed nonoperatively. Radiation and chemotherapy have low response rates in WDLS and DDLS, but novel agents targeted at chromosome 12 gene products MDM2 and CDK4 have shown promise in preclinical studies and are being tested in clinical trials. Cell line, tissue microarray, and genomic analyses have identified additional targets including ZIC1, TOP2A, AURKA, and IGF-1R, which could form the basis of future therapies. SUMMARY: Although complete surgical resection is currently the most effective treatment for WDLS and DDLS, the majority of patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma will eventually have recurrence and die of disease. It is hoped that a multimodality approach, which incorporates targeted therapies and complete surgical resection, will significantly improve patient outcomes.
Authors: Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffery Eckardt; Gerald Rosen; Elyn Riedel; Robert G Maki; Murray F Brennan; Samuel Singer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J Rosai; M Akerman; P Dal Cin; I DeWever; C D Fletcher; N Mandahl; F Mertens; F Mitelman; A Rydholm; R Sciot; G Tallini; H Van den Berghe; W Van de Ven; R Vanni; H Willen Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: S A Rosenberg; J Tepper; E Glatstein; J Costa; A Baker; M Brennan; E V DeMoss; C Seipp; W F Sindelar; P Sugarbaker; R Wesley Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1982-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C D Fletcher; M Akerman; P Dal Cin; I de Wever; N Mandahl; F Mertens; F Mitelman; J Rosai; A Rydholm; R Sciot; G Tallini; H van den Berghe; W van de Ven; R Vanni; H Willen Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Marta Regina Machado Mascarenhas; Lais de Abreu Mutti; João Marcos Goes de Paiva; Milvia Maria Simões E Silva Enokihara; Ival Peres Rosa; Mauro Yoshiaki Enokihara Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2017 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Daniel Braas; Ethan Ahler; Brenna Tam; David Nathanson; Mirielle Riedinger; Matthias R Benz; Kathleen B Smith; Fritz C Eilber; Owen N Witte; William D Tap; Hong Wu; Heather R Christofk Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Jason A Somarelli; Samantha Shetler; Mohit K Jolly; Xueyang Wang; Suzanne Bartholf Dewitt; Alexander J Hish; Shivee Gilja; William C Eward; Kathryn E Ware; Herbert Levine; Andrew J Armstrong; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: F J R Teixeira; A V Reis; R S S Medeiros; E H Akaishi; V C Moutinho; S D Couto Netto; T M Andrade Lima; A L F Perina; F O Ferreira; G O Mendes; M P Lallé; E M Utiyama Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2014-12
Authors: John Q Nguyen; Zain S Gowani; Maggie O'Connor; Isaac J Pence; The-Quyen Nguyen; Ginger E Holt; Herbert S Schwartz; Jennifer L Halpern; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 4.025