Literature DB >> 21551779

Pruning of dendrites and restoration of function after brain damage: Role of the NMDA receptor.

D A Kozlowski1, T A Jones, T Schallert.   

Abstract

Following unilateral injury to the forelimb-representation area of the sensorimotor cortex (FL-SMC) in adult rats, there occurs a biphasic process of overgrowth and partial elimination of neuronal dendrites in layer V pyramidal cells of the homotopic cortex of the opposite hemisphere. These neural events are associated with hyper-reliance on the non-impaired forelimb for postural-supporting and related movements that compensate for impaired function in the other forelimb. The overgrowth appears to be use-dependent because it can be prevented by one-sleeve casts that restrict the range of movements of the unimpaired limb during the period of expected neural growth. In development, "exuberant" growth of neurons is often followed by pruning, a process that has been associated with activity-dependency and a glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) mechanism. To determine whether a related mechanism might be operating in adult animals recovering from brain damage, MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, was administered during the pruning phase in adult rats that had sustained FL-SMC lesions. MK-801 prevented the elimination of dendrites in the FL-SMC rats and had no effect on dendritic arborization in Sham-operated rats. MK-801 reinstated dysfunction in the previously-recovered forelimb in FL-SMC rats, and had no effect in Sham-operated rats. These data are consistent with the possibility that there may be a functionally important pruning mechanism with a glutamatergic component in adults with FL-SMC lesions, just as in the developing brain.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 21551779     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-1994-7207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  6 in total

1.  Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions.

Authors:  D A Kozlowski; D C James; T Schallert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Pharmacological Enhancement of Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Tomoko Kitago
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Brain stimulation: Neuromodulation as a potential treatment for motor recovery following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  E Clayton; S K Kinley-Cooper; R A Weber; D L Adkins
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Hitting a moving target: Basic mechanisms of recovery from acquired developmental brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher C Giza; Bryan Kolb; Neil G Harris; Robert F Asarnow; Mayumi L Prins
Journal:  Dev Neurorehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.308

Review 5.  Drugs to Enhance Motor Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Post-stroke protection from maladaptive effects of learning with the non-paretic forelimb by bimanual home cage experience in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Abigail L Kerr; Malerie L Wolke; Jared A Bell; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.