Literature DB >> 21551340

Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation.

Greta James1, Derek J Koehler.   

Abstract

Probability matching is the tendency to match choice probabilities to outcome probabilities in a binary prediction task. This tendency is a long-standing puzzle in the study of decision making under risk and uncertainty, because always predicting the more probable outcome across a series of trials (maximizing) would yield greater predictive accuracy and payoffs. In three experiments, we tied the predominance of probability matching over maximizing to a generally adaptive cognitive operation that generates expectations regarding the aggregate outcomes of an upcoming sequence of events. Under conditions designed to diminish the generation or perceived applicability of such expectations, we found that the frequency of probability-matching behavior dropped substantially and maximizing became the norm.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21551340     DOI: 10.1177/0956797611407933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  8 in total

1.  More heads choose better than one: Group decision making can eliminate probability matching.

Authors:  Christin Schulze; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

2.  Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load.

Authors:  Christin Schulze; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  Betting on Illusory Patterns: Probability Matching in Habitual Gamblers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Andreas Wilke; Benjamin Scheibehenne; Paige McCanney; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

4.  Striving for perfection and falling short: The influence of goals on probability matching.

Authors:  Jie Gao; James E Corter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

5.  Probability matching in risky choice: the interplay of feedback and strategy availability.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; Derek J Koehler; Greta James; Tim Rakow; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

6.  Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity.

Authors:  Tony S L Wang; Nicole Christie; Piers D L Howe; Daniel R Little
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-11

7.  Balancing model-based and memory-free action selection under competitive pressure.

Authors:  Atsushi Kikumoto; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Probability matching is not the default decision making strategy in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Carmen Saldana; Nicolas Claidière; Joël Fagot; Kenny Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.