MOTIVATION: Condition-specific networks capture system-wide behavior under varying conditions such as environmental stresses, cell types or tissues. These networks frequently comprise parts that are unique to each condition, and parts that are shared among related conditions. Existing approaches for learning condition-specific networks typically identify either only differences or only similarities across conditions. Most of these approaches first learn networks per condition independently, and then identify similarities and differences in a post-learning step. Such approaches do not exploit the shared information across conditions during network learning. RESULTS: We describe an approach for learning condition-specific networks that identifies the shared and unique subgraphs during network learning simultaneously, rather than as a post-processing step. Our approach learns networks across condition sets, shares data from different conditions and produces high-quality networks that capture biologically meaningful information. On simulated data, our approach outperformed an existing approach that learns networks independently for each condition, especially for small training datasets. On microarray data of hundreds of deletion mutants in two, yeast stationary-phase cell populations, the inferred network structure identified several common and population-specific effects of these deletion mutants and several high-confidence cases of double-deletion pairs, which can be experimentally tested. Our results are consistent with and extend the existing knowledge base of differentiated cell populations in yeast stationary phase. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: C++ code can be accessed from http://www.broadinstitute.org/~sroy/condspec/ .
MOTIVATION: Condition-specific networks capture system-wide behavior under varying conditions such as environmental stresses, cell types or tissues. These networks frequently comprise parts that are unique to each condition, and parts that are shared among related conditions. Existing approaches for learning condition-specific networks typically identify either only differences or only similarities across conditions. Most of these approaches first learn networks per condition independently, and then identify similarities and differences in a post-learning step. Such approaches do not exploit the shared information across conditions during network learning. RESULTS: We describe an approach for learning condition-specific networks that identifies the shared and unique subgraphs during network learning simultaneously, rather than as a post-processing step. Our approach learns networks across condition sets, shares data from different conditions and produces high-quality networks that capture biologically meaningful information. On simulated data, our approach outperformed an existing approach that learns networks independently for each condition, especially for small training datasets. On microarray data of hundreds of deletion mutants in two, yeast stationary-phase cell populations, the inferred network structure identified several common and population-specific effects of these deletion mutants and several high-confidence cases of double-deletion pairs, which can be experimentally tested. Our results are consistent with and extend the existing knowledge base of differentiated cell populations in yeast stationary phase. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION:C++ code can be accessed from http://www.broadinstitute.org/~sroy/condspec/ .
Authors: M Juanita Martinez; Sushmita Roy; Amanda B Archuletta; Peter D Wentzell; Sonia Santa Anna-Arriola; Angelina L Rodriguez; Anthony D Aragon; Gabriel A Quiñones; Chris Allen; Margaret Werner-Washburne Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2004-09-29 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Christopher T Harbison; D Benjamin Gordon; Tong Ihn Lee; Nicola J Rinaldi; Kenzie D Macisaac; Timothy W Danford; Nancy M Hannett; Jean-Bosco Tagne; David B Reynolds; Jane Yoo; Ezra G Jennings; Julia Zeitlinger; Dmitry K Pokholok; Manolis Kellis; P Alex Rolfe; Ken T Takusagawa; Eric S Lander; David K Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel; Richard A Young Journal: Nature Date: 2004-09-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Joseph V Gray; Gregory A Petsko; Gerald C Johnston; Dagmar Ringe; Richard A Singer; Margaret Werner-Washburne Journal: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 11.056
Authors: Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Alireza Fotuhi Siahpirani; Sara Knaack; Deborah Chasman; Morten Seirup; Rupa Sridharan; Ron Stewart; James Thomson; Sushmita Roy Journal: Genome Res Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 9.438
Authors: Ye Tian; Bai Zhang; Eric P Hoffman; Robert Clarke; Zhen Zhang; Ie-Ming Shih; Jianhua Xuan; David M Herrington; Yue Wang Journal: BMC Syst Biol Date: 2014-07-24