Literature DB >> 21550952

Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting.

Stephen N Davis1, Wenhui Wei, Satish Garg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate health care utilization, cost, and clinical outcomes among non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who initiated insulin glargine therapy with use of either a disposable pen or vial and syringe in a managed care setting in the United States.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of a large national claims database consisted of a 6-month baseline period and a follow-up period extending 12 months from the date of the patient's first filled insulin glargine prescription. Outcomes included medication persistence, hypoglycemic events, health care utilization and costs, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (A1C) levels.
RESULTS: There were 3,842 matched patients (n = 1,921 per group). Patients initiating insulin glargine therapy with a disposable pen were significantly less likely to discontinue or switch treatment during the 12-month follow-up period versus patients in the vial and syringe group (P<.001). Disposable pen use was also associated with a reduced hypoglycemia risk. The disposable pen group had overall health care utilization similar to the vial and syringe group; however, the pen group had significantly fewer diabetes-related hospitalizations (P = .04) and significantly more diabetes-related endocrinologist visits (P = .04). Overall health care costs were similar between the 2 groups, despite higher pharmacy costs in the disposable pen group. In a subgroup of patients with available baseline and follow-up A1C values (n = 511), the disposable pen group achieved similar A1C control at follow-up despite a higher baseline A1C value than in the vial and syringe group.
CONCLUSION: Initiation of insulin glargine therapy with a disposable pen in patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with better treatment persistence and decreased hypoglycemia in comparison with the vial and syringe method, without any increase in total health care utilization or costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550952     DOI: 10.4158/EP10401.OR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pract        ISSN: 1530-891X            Impact factor:   3.443


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pen Devices for Insulin Self-Administration Compared With Needle and Vial: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pieralessandro Lasalvia; Julián Esteban Barahona-Correa; Diana Marcela Romero-Alvernia; Sebastián Gil-Tamayo; Camilo Castañeda-Cardona; Juan Gabriel Bayona; Juan José Triana; Andrés Felipe Laserna; Miguel Mejía-Torres; Paula Restrepo-Jimenez; Juliana Jimenez-Zapata; Diego Rosselli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

2.  Adherence to Insulin Pen Therapy Is Associated with Reduction in Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Arthi Chandran; Machaon K Bonafede; Sonali Nigam; Rita Saltiel-Berzin; Laurence J Hirsch; Betsy J Lahue
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-05

3.  Does Device Make Any Difference? A Real-world Retrospective Study of Insulin Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Raymond Miao; Wenhui Wei; Jay Lin; Lin Xie; Onur Baser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 4.  Adherence and Persistence to Insulin Therapy in People with Diabetes: Impact of Connected Insulin Pen Delivery Ecosystem.

Authors:  Devin Steenkamp; Elizabeth L Eby; Nany Gulati; Birong Liao
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-05

5.  Real-world outcomes of initiating insulin glargine-based treatment versus premixed analog insulins among US patients with type 2 diabetes failing oral antidiabetic drugs.

Authors:  Onur Baser; Krishna Tangirala; Wenhui Wei; Lin Xie
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-10-03

6.  Use of basal insulin and the associated clinical outcomes among elderly nursing home residents with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective chart review study.

Authors:  Keith L Davis; Wenhui Wei; Juliana L Meyers; Brett S Kilpatrick; Naushira Pandya
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Real-world outcomes of US employees with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin: a comparative retrospective database study.

Authors:  Li Wang; Wenhui Wei; Raymond Miao; Lin Xie; Onur Baser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Using observational data to inform the design of a prospective effectiveness study for a novel insulin delivery device.

Authors:  Michael Grabner; Yong Chen; Matthew Nguyen; Scott D Abbott; Ralph Quimbo
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-09-23

9.  Real world outcomes of adding rapid-acting insulin versus switching to analog premix insulin among US patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine.

Authors:  Raymond Miao; Wenhui Wei; Onur Baser; Lin Xie
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  The INITIATOR study: pilot data on real-world clinical and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes initiating injectable therapy.

Authors:  Sarah Thayer; Wenhui Wei; Erin Buysman; Lee Brekke; William Crown; Michael Grabner; Swetha Raparla; Ralph Quimbo; Mark J Cziraky; Wenli Hu; Robert Cuddihy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.